Search

Background The transition of older persons between care settings is recognised as a particularly critical and vulnerable period (Renom-Guiteras et al. 2014). Appropriate documentation and processes are key in assisting the provision of quality, safe, person-centred care when transferring older persons from residential to acute care settings. This paper reports on the design phase of a national transfer document for older persons. The objective was to inform the development of a draft national transfer document. Methods Development consisted of two phases 1) an integrative review and 2) focus group interviews with stakeholders. The review was guided by Whittemore and Knafl's (2005) integrative review framework. Data from studies using both quantitative and qualitative methodologies were extracted and thematically analysed. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, focus group interviews (n=8) were conducted with a convenience sample of key stakeholders (n=68) to establish their perspectives regarding transfer documents. Data were analysed using content analysis. Results from both phases were integrated to guide the development of the draft document. A multidisciplinary panel of experts in older persons care, reviewed and provided feedback on the draft transfer document. Results Within the review, thirty identified papers focused on transfer documentation between residential and acute care. Results indicated that using a standardised document can potentiate the delivery and acceptance of relevant person-centred information between all parties when transferring an older person between residential and acute care settings. Qualitative interview findings highlighted important aspects for consideration regarding the layout, content and format of future transfer documentation. Following collaboration with the expert panel the transfer document was developed for piloting. Conclusion Consistency and clarity of information is key for a successful transfer of older persons from residential to acute settings. Information needs to be evidence-based, current, and subject to response and change in accordance with best available international practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background There is an increasing number of older persons experiencing transfer episodes between residential and acute care facilities (Griffiths et al. 2014). Current transfer documentation is diverse; often only containing basic information and very little person centred patient information. The objective of this HSE National Clinical Programme for Older People funded study was to develop a national person centred transfer tool, for use during patient transfer between residential and acute services. Following an extensive literature review, focus group interviews with stakeholders and input from an expert panel, a pilot transfer document was developed. This paper reports on the pilot study of this document. Methods Researchers, in consultation with the expert panel, developed questionnaires. Questionnaires were quantitative, with three open-ended questions. Of the 28 residential settings and 3 acute settings that were contacted, 26 residential and 3 acute settings (93%) participated in the study. The pre-pilot questionnaire asked staff in residential settings their perceptions on current transfer documentation (n=875). The post-pilot questionnaire asked staff in residential and acute care settings their thoughts on the new transfer document which was used for the pilot (n=1085). Results Findings suggest that staff agree that the new transfer tool is person centred, contains relevant patient information and could help communication between healthcare professionals in these settings. Findings also indicate that the length of time to complete the document is of concern, particularly in an emergency and there were suggestions from staff in residential care services that some sections could be prepopulated. Conclusion In order to have a transfer document that is efficient, and person centred, there is a need for it to be available electronically and easy for staff to fully complete particularly in an emergency transfer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Bowel movements are vital to decision making, but are frequently overlooked in practice due to the fast-paced nature of medical ward rounds, impacting on patient care. This was felt to be exacerbated locally by the difficulties of finding the information in the nursing notes. Aim To improve the documentation of bowel movements. Method We performed a closed loop audit examining how well patients' bowel movements are documented in nursing and medical notes across 3 wards at a district general hospital. We collected snapshot data on whether a bowel chart was present, whether bowel movements were recorded regularly and whether doctors documented bowel movements during ward rounds. We then changed the colour of bowel chart paper from white to yellow, with identical contents. This data was prospectively collected again 5 weeks later for comparison. Results The sample size included 62 inpatients. Prior to the change in bowel chart, 79% of patients' nursing folders had a bowel chart. Documentation of bowel movements in nursing and medical notes was 25% and 30% respectively. Following the introduction of yellow coloured bowel charts, 90% of patients' nursing notes had a bowel chart present, with an increase in documentation in nursing and medical notes to 74% and 69% respectively. Conclusion (s) The importance of good bowel movements is essential to management decisions and discharge planning. Locally, this has been inhibited by the difficulties of locating white bowel charts in a folder of white paper, leading to incomplete documentation and poor recognition of problems in bowel movements. Changing the colour of the bowel charts made it easier to recognise the bowel chart, allowing nurses and doctors to use the bowel chart more efficiently, hopefully improving patient care. This change has been recognised as effective and has been rolled out trust wide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Advance care planning (ACP) is an ongoing conversation where healthcare professionals explore patients' and families' wishes in order to act within their best interests. The COVID19 pandemic continues to highlight the importance of timely ACP, namely while our patients have capacity. We noted that despite advancing age, accumulating co-morbidities and high clinical frailty scores (CFS); ACP discussions were not taking place within our elderly department. We aimed to increase ACP conversations and ensure documentation on ReSPECT forms to allow continuity within primary care. Methods 10 patients per ward were randomly selected. 69 patients met inclusion criteria (over 65 with CFS ≥5 or any patient with dementia). We reviewed electronic and paper records and defined evidence of ACP as ReSPECT form including preferred place of death (PPoD), or discussion with patient or relative in medical notes. We randomly selected a pilot ward and applied interventions over 4 weeks: • Small group teaching to junior doctors • Visiting ward MDTs to identify appropriate patients for ACP • Presenting baseline data to geriatricians • Visual aids from the palliative care team and prompt sheets for doctors. Results Prior to our interventions, 22% of our sample had evidence of advance care planning, 33% of discussions documented on ReSPECT form. Following our intervention period we reviewed medical notes on our pilot ward. 58% patients now had evidence of ACP, with 66% documented on a ReSPECT form. Conclusion We achieved a significant increase in advance care planning within our elderly medicine department, and are therefore better equipped to provide personalised care alongside our patients' wishes and values. Next steps: • Expanding teaching across the multi-disciplinary team • ACP 'champions' to highlight appropriate patients • Expansion of initial interventions across the department We hope to embed and maintain this change through education, training and inspiring others. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Constipation is a widely prevalent issue in older adults that may result in complications such as urinary retention, delirium and bowel obstruction. Previous studies have indicated that while stool charts are well completed by nursing staff, they are infrequently monitored by doctors. This project aimed to improve the documentation of bowel movement by doctors on ward rounds to 85%, by the end of a 3-month period. Methods: Formulation of the project was achieved using group work and a fishbone diagram which focussed on how doctors can improve on documenting bowel movements. Baseline data were collected from inpatient notes on weekdays over a three-week period on a geriatric ward inNorthern GeneralHospital, Sheffield. Interventions of posters and stickers of the poo emoji were placed on walls and in inpatient notes respectively as a reminder. Postintervention data were collected on weekdays over two weeks, and then repeated a month later to assess for a sustained change. Results: The data on bowel activity documentation were collected from 28 patients. The baseline data showed that bowel activity was monitored daily on the ward 56.25% of the time. There was a significant increase in documentation of 85.75% following the interventions.The sustainability study showed that bowel activity was documented on the ward 59.09% of the time. Conclusions: This study shows how a strong effect on behavioural change can be accomplished through simple interventions such as stickers and posters. As most wards currently still use paper notes, this is a generalisable model that other wards can trial. However, this study also shows the difficulty in maintaining behavioural change over extended periods of time. Further PDSA cycles should examine the reasons behind the difficulty sustaining the change and implement new changes that aim to overcome them. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Constipation has a high prevalence of 30-40% in those aged over 65. It can lead to complications including delirium, faecal impaction, stercoral ulceration, and bowel obstruction. Although stool charts are used in geriatric wards to monitor bowel movements to guide management of constipation, they are often inconsistently recorded. Similarly, regular laxatives are often not prescribed for constipated patients due to ward pressures or unawareness regarding their importance. Aims: Our aims were to audit the rates of recording on stool charts and laxative prescription in a geriatrics department, and to assess whether amultifactorial intervention aimed at both doctors and nursing staff improved these rates. Methods: Two independent assessors audited the recording of stool charts, and rates of constipating medications and laxative prescription in two geriatrics wards in a tertiary UK hospital. A multifactorial intervention was implemented, consisting of didactic sessions for doctors and nurses, healthcare assistant champions to promote the recording of stool charts, and consolidation of bowel movement recording onto a single paper stool chart by the bedside rather than multiple charts. After the intervention, the data was re-audited on the same wards. Descriptive statistics and frequency tabulation were used for data analysis. Results: Data was collected from 33 patients. Pre-intervention, stool charts were recorded daily in 13 patients, 10 patients had no stool chart record, 20 patients were on at least one constipating medication, 12 patients were prescribed at least one laxative, and 5 out of 7 patients with opiates had laxatives co-prescribed. Post-intervention, stool charts were recorded daily in 21 patients, all patients had a stool chart record, 20 patients were on at least one constipating medication, 23 patients were prescribed at least one laxative, and 2 out of 4 patients with opiates had laxatives co-prescribed. Our intervention improved daily recording on stool charts by 24%, resulted in all patients having a current stool chart and improved prescription of regular laxatives by 34%. Conclusions: A multifactorial intervention based on educational sessions, healthcare assistants acting as champions, and consolidation of recording of bowel movements into a single chart, improved stool chart recording and prescription of regular laxatives in a tertiary geriatrics department. Future auditing will extend the sample size and generalise the intervention to other hospital departments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]