Search

Abstract Objective The project aimed to collect expert consensus statements for the profiling of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) candidate to biologic agents (bDMARDs) treatment, in order to better define the drivers for the best treatment choice. Methods The 6 more interesting topics about axSpA patient profiling were identified by the project steering committee and a panel of axSpA Italian experts. A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed for each of the selected topics according to the PICO format. Two rounds of a modified Delphi process were conducted. In the 1st round, the steering committee evaluated the results of the SLR in order to formulate statements for each topic. In the 2nd round, the experts panel discussed, rephrased when needed, and voted the level of agreement (on a 5-point Likert-type scale) for each statement. Consensus was defined as ≥66% agreement. Results The topics selected for the analysis were the differential efficacy of available bDMARDs on enthesitis/dactylitis, uveitis, radiographic progression and cardiovascular involvement, and the clinical response in non radiographic-axSpA and in patients receiving a second-line bDMARD. The Delphi rounds formulated 19 statements, all reaching the defined level of consensus in a second round including 25 rheumatologists highly skilled in the management of axSpA. Conclusion Identified consensus statements can help clinicians to apply to routine-care settings the results from clinical studies and international recommendations, providing a guide for individualization of treatment strategy in axSpA patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The clinical spectrum and prognosis of systemic sclerosis (SSc) seem to vary among patients' populations recruited during different time periods. In order to verify this possible evolution we investigated the clinico-serological and survival rate in a large Italian SSc series (821 patients; 746 females, 75 males; mean age 53.7 ± 13.9 SD years) recruited between 2000 and 2011. The observed findings were compared with previous studies of the world literature.Compared to older Italian SSc series, the present patients' population showed a significantly increased prevalence of limited cutaneous SSc (from 72 to 87.5%; p ≤ .0001) and serum anti-centromere antibodies (from 39 to 47,4%; p ≤ .001), with a significant reduction of lung (from 81 to 63.7%; p ≤ .0001), heart (from 35 to 20.5%; p ≤ .0001), and renal involvement (from 10 to 3.8%; p ≤ .0001), and skin ulcers (from 54 to 16.5%; p ≤ .0001). Cumulative 10th-year survival showed a clear-cut increase (80.7%) compared to our previous series (69.2%). These findings were mirrored by the results of survival studies published during the last five decades, grouped according to the time periods of patients’' recruitment at the referral centers. A clear progression of 10th-year survival rates was detectable, from the 54% median survival of the oldest studies (1935–1974) to 74% and 83.5% of the more recent SSc series, 1976–1999 and after 1999, respectively. In conclusion, the favorable evolution of SSc pathomorphosis and prognosis during the last decades might be related to more diffuse physician/patient awareness of this harmful disease and availability of diagnostic tools, the consequent wider recruitment of patients in the early stages of the disease, as well as to the improved therapeutic strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]