Search

Despite the term 'never events' these events continue to happen in the NHS. This paper considers the findings from a review of the causes of nine surgical 'never events'; looking at the learning from the investigations to provide 'a window on the system' and considering the multiple issues that need to be addressed to reduce future risk. The paper discusses why many of the causes described in investigation reports cannot be adequately addressed by the action plans that target each individual cause - things are never that simple - instead the causes should be seen as a reflection of the current state of safety within an organization, showing the underlying cultural and systems issues that need to be addressed at a wider level than that of the incident itself. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The English National Health Service (NHS) announced a new programme to incentivize use of the NHS Safety Thermometer (NHS ST) in the NHS Operating Framework for 2012/13. For the first time, the NHS is using the Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) scheme, a contract lever, to incentivize ALL providers of NHS care to measure four common complications (harms) using the NHS ST in a proactive way on one day per month. This national CQUIN scheme provides financial reward for the collection of baseline data with a view to incentivizing the achievement of improvement goals in later years. In this paper, we describe the rationale for this large-scale data collection, the purpose of the instrument and its potential contribution to our current understanding of patient safety. It is not a comprehensive description of the method or preliminary data. This will be published separately. The focus of the NHS ST on pressure ulcers, falls, catheters and urine infection and venous thromboembolism is broadly applicable to patients across all healthcare settings, but is specifically pertinent to older people who, experiencing more healthcare intervention, are at risk of not one but multiple harms. In this paper, we also describe an innovative patient-level composite measure of the absence of harm from the four identified, termed as "harmfreecare" which is unique to the NHS ST and is under development to raise standards for patient safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The criminal law looks set to play a larger role in regulating healthcare. Until recently, health professionals only faced the prospect of criminal liability if it could be proved that their gross negligence resulted in the death of a patient. In such a case, the professional could face a charge of gross negligence manslaughter (GNM). Prosecutions for ‘medical manslaughter’ have generated concern among doctors worried about what is perceived as a rise in the number of doctors facing criminal prosecution and the impact prosecutions are having on healthcare practice. May more frequent resort to the criminal process damage rather than promote better health care? In seeking to try to answer this question, the first problem is that reliable data in this area about how many prosecutions are brought and how they fare are limited due to the way cases are recorded. What evidence does exist is often based on media reports or samples that are not representative. This paper will argue that, while the real risk of being prosecuted for medical manslaughter remains low, such fears should not be dismissed because, as Donald Berwick has argued, ‘fear is toxic’ – for health professionals and their patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the National Health Service in England there are many sources of information pertaining to patient safety. This paper sets out to describe the challenge of measuring patient safety and describes the key data sources that underpin the national understanding of the area. The paper will describe how utilizing all of the available patient safety data, irrespective of the variability inherent, can ensure that practising clinicians have a better understanding of the current picture of patient safety and can fully evidence the efficacy of their improvement actions. Examples of effective triangulation of these data sources are given with acknowledgement of the challenges this can present in terms of engagement and understanding, particularly in the clinical context. Recommendations for the effective use of information in the assessment of patient safety are also provided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper discusses how we have improved patient handover by implementing an electronic system for weekend handover. We discuss the process of changing handover methods and the results of an audit comparing our old paper based book versus our new 'e-handover' system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper highlights the issue of independent midwives practising without professional indemnity insurance. The paper explains the history of the provision, decline and now absence of insurance for midwives who practise independently. Despite the government's commitment to professional indemnity insurance cover for all health professionals working independently and not covered by the Clinical Negligence Scheme for Trusts, an exception has been made for independent midwives. The paper questions how the government can maintain its commitment to choices for maternity care yet permit midwives to care for pregnant women and attend at the birth of a baby without requiring insurance. There is no mandatory requirement to insure by the Nurses and Midwives Council (NMC). Without a mandatory requirement to insure the only advice given to midwives by the NMC is that they should inform their patients of the insurance position. The way in which information should be given is not stated and the practice is not consistent. Little information on the implications of lack of insurance is provided to parents considering retaining an independent midwife for the birth of their child. This situation leaves parents and children exposed to a situation where there is a clinical negligence claim no possibility of obtaining damages from an uninsured Defendant of limited personal means. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article examines the issues surrounding White Paper's uncovering of the proposal to reforming the health professionals' Trust, Assurance and Safety regulation in Great Britain. The White Paper expressed that to reform, the importance of perceptions must be rightly emphasized as public needs to perceive that the regulatory system is operating in the interests of patients. It also stresses that the General Medical Council's (GMC) four functions must be integrated in the regulatory framework.

In the United Kingdom, individuals requiring inpatient care for mental health purposes can be admitted to hospital with their consent as informal patients, or formally through procedure(s) prescribed by law. There are, however, instances where individuals otherwise referred to as informal patients are on admission without their consent or in circumstances that amount to deprivation of their liberty as defined by the United Kingdom Supreme Court and without recourse to lawful procedures by their clinical team as stipulated by the European Convention on Human Rights. Such instances might be without the awareness of the individuals or their clinical teams or the clinical teams might be unclear as to which statute applies to patient care. This paper has been written to help clinicians define the legal status of patients at the point of admission, during their stay on the inpatient unit and the statute(s) that apply to different in-patient situations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pressure ulcer prevention is core to nursing practice and as such is often overlooked as a safety risk. A multifaceted quality improvement initiative guided by both Felgen’s Model and the Model for Improvement delivered implemented in a systematic way led to significant improvements in the prevalence and incidence of pressure ulcers. Prevalence of all ulcers was reduced from 21% to 7% and to 3.1% when grade 1 ulcers are removed from analysis. Incidence (i.e. ulcers acquired in hospital) was reduced from 6.6% to 2.4% and 1.4% when grade 1 ulcers are removed from the analysis. Furthermore, improvements have been sustained for more than 2 years. This paper presents a case study of framework for change developed across a healthcare region NHS Tayside in Scotland. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

In the wake of the Mid Staffordshire Public Inquiry, this paper considers the arguments for and against the imposition of a statutory duty of candour on individuals, examining the validity of claims that such a duty would result in greater secrecy among healthcare professionals and lead to defensive practice. Examination of arguments for imposing an individual duty, highlights the pre-existing moral obligation on healthcare professionals to inform patients who have suffered harm, has not yet been sufficiently embedded throughout the NHS by professional codes of conduct, and the need to establish systematic formalised error reporting in order to continue to minimise clinical error. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The disclosure of adverse events to patients or their families who have been affected is considered to be a central feature of high quality and safer patient care, but despite this, as few as 30% of harmful errors may currently be disclosed to patients. Advocates of open disclosure propose that failing to communicate effectively with patients following adverse events may have negative repercussions for all stakeholders. The disclosure of adverse events and errors to patients and their families is partly fulfilling the duty of candour advocated in the numerous recent reports into the quality and safety within the NHS. This paper considers why disclosure remains challenging for organisations and professionals alike, despite guidance and in a clear moral imperative and commitment from stakeholders to transparency in healthcare. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper considers the judgments in JD v MELANIE MATHER [2012] EWHC 3063 (QB) and LORETTA OLIVER v GARY WILLIAMS [2013] EWHC 600 (QB) and how new prognostic models for breast cancer survival can be used by litigants to overcome the perceived injustices created by common law principles of causation established in Gregg v Scott [2005] UKHL 2. We consider how the use of epidemiological data in breast cancer cases permits the lawyer to pose the question of how a delay in diagnosis reduces life expectancy and how, in an increasingly high number of cases, that is preferable to the traditional approach of addressing only survival. By applying new statistical data to establish the effect of delay upon life expectancy, the court will be able to avoid apparent injustice without straining yet further established principles of common law causation. More importantly, in many cases for which redress is currently not available, it will better reflect the duty of the treating doctor and the expectations of the patient, something the common law should strive to achieve. This approach was applied in JD v MELANIE MATHER [2012] EWHC 3063 (QB) and considered in LORETTA OLIVER v GARY WILLIAMS [2013] EWHC 600 (QB). [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The aim of the paper is to assess open disclosure in Ireland following clinical adverse events in healthcare. A number of areas were examined from the patient's and healthcare team's perspectives. The barriers/constraints to open disclosure, the extent of policies, procedures or guidelines that are available for staff to consult with, inclusive of how they are implemented, harvested valuable insight. The supports available for healthcare staff following an adverse event and patients' expectations after such an event are also encompassed to include the relationship open disclosure has on concerns regarding litigious intent. The questionnaire was disseminated to a multidisciplinary healthcare group. The questions were numbered 1-9, with a mixture of open and closed questions. A five-point Likert format was used with three questions in attitudinal/ opinion statements, regarding supports available for staff following an adverse event. A Statistical Package for Social Sciences was used to assist with the interpretation of data. This study was directed at the multidisciplinary healthcare team and senior management within the Health Service Executive (HSE) and Voluntary sectors. The oldest hospitals in Ireland are voluntary public hospitals some of them originating from the 18th century, having been established by charities and religious orders. Voluntary hospitals are partly funded by the HSE, specifically having their own governance structure. There was a response rate of 67% (n ¼ 192). A total 56.5% of respondents stated their organization did not have an open disclosure policy, procedure or guideline in place however, 16% of the attendees stated there was one in place. A total of 54.4% (104) acknowledged barriers/concerns surrounding open disclosure, with fear of litigious intent noted by 24% of respondents. A total of 52.3% (101) identified support availability to staff following an adverse event, 38.9% (10) felt there was little/no follow-up support, with 11.1.% (2) stating they were made to feel guilty, and associated it with being "on trial". Findings demonstrate an unstructured approach to disclosure of adverse events in Ireland, with fear of litigation a major concern for healthcare professionals. Error awareness among the general public, the introduction of protective legislation and implementation of a national standard on open disclosure in conjunction with practical training and education will all positively and practically influence open disclosure of adverse events in Ireland. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Healthcare is a highly regulated environment. This has driven what could be characterized as a papersafe approach, whereby organizations are required to demonstrate to a multiplicity of regulators, inspectorates and accrediting bodies that they are paper safe. However, for many organizations, this has not produced a system which is actually patient safe; rather it has in practice operated as a parallel system that does not reflect the true state of safety. This project looks at a quality improvement and patient safety programme and critically asks the question of whether it is flawed because of failure to address issues surrounding Doctors and cultural change. We used Johnson & Schole's cultural web framework to explore the attitudes of junior doctors towards a patient safety and quality improvement programme. Data collection was through the use of focus groups backed up with quantitative data from a web based questionnaire survey. It has been demonstrated that Doctors represent a dominant sub-culture within the NHS and their beliefs, attitudes and value are often at odds or unrecognized by senior healthcare managers. Unless the cultural differences are adequately addressed then transformational change projects such as 'Best and Safest Care' are unlikely to succeed. A better understanding of the organizational context allows for more appropriate change interventions to be developed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In July 2010, the Government published the White Paper Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS, which places a strong emphasis on patient safety, sets the long-term vision for the NHS and describes a coherent framework of reform to deliver health care amongst the best in the world. Good nutritional care is a prerequisite of safe care and hence fundamental to the achievement of this vision, especially for vulnerable individuals. This article outlines the prevalence and costs associated with malnutrition and the impact of malnutrition on patient safety within the context of the current NHS reforms. It concludes with guidance for clinicians and senior managers which, where fully implemented, will facilitate good nutritional care and ensure compliance to nutritional guidelines, standards and legislation including the regulations relating to nutrition as set out in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2009 and the Care Quality Commission (Registration) Regulations 2009. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Failure to use or interpret laboratory tests correctly is a relatively uncommon cause of direct patient harm in National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) listings although can have disastrous results in some patients. Evidence-based laboratory medicine does not follow the same criteria as many clinical interventional situations because of the absence and unfeasibility of randomized controlled trials in many situations. Much good practice is therefore based on level 4 evidence or consensus expert opinion. Much of this opinion is scattered throughout the medical literature and not readily available to medical practitioners. This paper describes the development of a web-based resource to provide rapid access to 'heuristics' to guide appropriate use and interpretation of laboratory tests, using the specific example of drug safety monitoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction There is an increasing expectation for the NHS to deliver a constantly up-to-date health service that is both safe and patient-oriented. This paper outlines the findings of a new risk assessment tool implemented across the organization targeted specifically to medical devices. Method The process employs a new medical devices risk assessment tool (MeDRa) to collect quantitative data relating to the contributory factors and control measures associated with medical devices used in the clinical setting. The tool utilises the responses from healthcare professionals as the 'real experts' in assessing risk to compute risk ratings for each device. Consequently the risk assessments are validated through the professional judgement of the clinical staff. Results As the data is inputted, the software tool computes the individual risk profiles for device categories in the particular clinical setting. A macro perspective of medical device risk is produced through statistical analysis and mathematical modelling using cross-tabulations. Risk perceptions are influenced by the differences in professional roles of nursing and medical staff. The outcome of the analysis is a report on medical device risks across the organization and an associated action plan, which identifies ways of mitigating those risks. Conclusions This approach efficiently produced risk assessments for each clinical area across the whole Trust in a matter of weeks. The MeDRa tool collated evidence to satisfy many of the criteria necessary for the external assurance framework. The subsequent statistical analysis and mathematical modelling highlighted a number of issues across the Trust that required interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Using data from the UK National Reporting and Learning System and the National Health Service Litigation Authority, this paper assesses trends in patient safety incidents and litigation in relation to ophthalmic surgery generally and vitreoretinal (VR) surgery in particular. Examples of human error and equipment-related incidents in VR surgery are discussed. Data from incident reporting and litigation should be interpreted with care as these are influenced by many factors. An open culture, improved reporting and prioritisation of patient safety will help provide further insight into the prevalence and causes of patient safety incidents in VR surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The 'Modern Matron' is one of the prominent nursing roles to emerge from the NHS Plan. The underpinning principle is to have a professional leader who is accountable for co-ordinating safe, high-quality care to improve patients' NHS experience. This paper discusses findings from a study of the implementation of the Modern Matron role in an acute NHS Trust in the East of England. The theoretical framework of 'limiting harm' was used to assess the extent to which the Modern Matron could contribute towards safe effective care and the reduction of harm. The study found that error-prone situations were clearly identified and that the Matrons were perceived to have a positive impact on a range of clinical issues. The evidence from this small study suggests that the Modern Matron role has the potential to make a positive contribution to patient safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the current environment of culture change and financial pressure on the National Health Service, quality improvement initiatives are heralded as new vehicles for workplace evolution. Foundation Year One doctors encounter many of the problems impinging on quality, and their enthusiasm and number make them an indispensable resource and critical mass for improvement. In response to the increasing importance of quality improvement training, and as part of an ongoing project to embed quality improvement education in the Severn Deanery region, this paper describes the evolution of a questionnaire tool to assess the attitudes and beliefs of a cohort of new Foundation Year One doctors. An electronic survey was developed and validated to address each aim of quality care. The survey was sent by email to every Foundation Year One doctor in the Severn Deanery. New Foundation Year One doctors' attitudes are overwhelmingly positive towards quality improvement and patient safety; however, universally, they do not feel valued and listened to. In addition, they do not feel that their previous medical education has fully equipped them to improve the quality and safety of the care they deliver to their patients. Foundation Year One doctors represent a large, intelligent and enthusiastic workforce and in an environment where quality is now accepted as paramount, harnessing their potential through better quality improvement training could prove advantageous to all National Health Service stakeholders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper summarises the problem of the recognition and management of sepsis in in-patients. A case vignette describes a common scenario faced by trainees, in which timely and effective care is difficult to deliver. We offer suggestions for possible changes in hospital systems and care delivery that are likely to lead to better outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The author talks about the controversy on obstetric brachial plexus injury (OBPI) in Great Britain. He discusses several reviews on the paper written by Anthony Noble regarding the causes of OBPI. Noble claimed that OBPI may be caused by forces of labor, not by excessive traction on the fetal neck. Questions on the role of forces in OBPI are presented.

An introduction is presented in which the editor discusses articles in the issue related to patient safety regulation and technology in healthcare delivery, including Adam Darkin's article on practical implications of implementing telehealth services and Gordon Caldwell's paper on clinical leadership value.