Search

Grid-interactive building control poses a critical challenge in the context of grid modernization and decarbonization. Recently, various artificial intelligence-based optimal control approaches have been proposed, providing innovative solutions to optimal building control problems. However, researchers and practitioners are now confronted with a dilemma when selecting appropriate control strategies, ranging from model-based (knowledge-incorporating) to learning-based (data-driven) approaches, and hybrid methods combining them. Although each algorithm in existing literature claims superiority over specific baselines, their performance has never been systematically compared and analyzed, owing to the absence of a unified platform for comprehensive evaluation. To fill this knowledge gap, we identify and implement all state-of-the-art approaches within a modular training and evaluation framework, assessing their efficacy in a grid-interactive building control problem. In this paper, we also introduce a streamlined hybrid method that complements existing hybrid approaches. Our comparative study reveals and quantifies the advantages of hybrid methods: on average, they achieve near-optimal control while requiring less than 14% of the online computation of traditional model-based methods. To achieve this performance, they need as few as 2% of the training samples of purely learning-based methods. Finally, we provide insights into the merits, limitations, and implementation of each method to help researchers better understand the state of the art and future directions. The software framework implemented in this study is open-sourced to facilitate future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) algorithm, Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO2), is deployed on a custom spacecraft (S/C) build and loss model to determine if an Artificial Intelligence (AI) can learn to monitor satellite constellation health and determine an optimal replacement strategy. A custom environment is created to simulate how S/C are built, launched, generate revenue, and finally decay. The reinforcement learning agent successfully learned an optimal policy for two models: a Simplified Model where the financial cost of actions is ignored; and an Advanced Model where the financial cost of actions is a major element. In both models the AI monitors the constellations and takes multiple strategic and tactical actions to replace satellites to maintain constellation performance. The Simplified Model showed that the PPO2 algorithm was able to converge on an optimal solution after ∼ 200,000 simulations. The Advanced Model was much more difficult for the AI to learn, and thus, the performance drops during the early episodes, but eventually converges to an optimal policy at ∼ 25,000,000 simulations. With the Advanced Model, the AI is taking actions that are successfully providing strategies for constellation management and satellite replacements which include these actions' financial implications. Thus, the methods in this paper provide initial research developments towards a real-world tool and an AI application that can aid various Aerospace businesses in managing Low Earth Orbit (LEO) constellations. This type of AI application may become imperative for deploying and maintaining small satellite mega-constellations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]