Search

Distributed optimization algorithms have the advantages of privacy protection and parallel computing. However, the distributed nature of these algorithms makes the system vulnerable to external attacks. This paper presents two penalty function based resilient algorithms for constrained distributed optimization under static and dynamic attacks. The objective function of the optimization problem is extended to nonsmooth ones and the convergence of the proposed algorithms in this case are proved under some mild conditions. Simulation experiments are performed and compared with some existing resilient primal-dual optimization algorithms using median-based mean estimator. For static attack, the proposed algorithm has better performance and faster convergence rate in the simulation experiments. For dynamic attack, the proposed algorithm has better performance and robustness in the simulation experiments, which illustrate that the proposed algorithms are more effective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Constrained multi-objective optimization problems (CMOPs) are difficult to handle because objectives and constraints need to be considered simultaneously, especially when the constraints are extremely complex. Some recent algorithms work well when dealing with CMOPs with a simple feasible region; however, the effectiveness of most algorithms degrades considerably for CMOPs with complex feasible regions. To address this issue, this paper proposes a multi-stage evolutionary algorithm, where constraints are added one after the other and handled in different stages of evolution. Specifically, in the early stages, the algorithm only considers a small number of constraints, which can make the population efficiently converge to the potential feasible region with good diversity. As the algorithm moves to the later stages, more constraints are considered to search the optimal solutions based on the solutions obtained in the previous stages. Furthermore, a strategy for sorting the constraint-handling priority according to the impact on the unconstrained Pareto front is proposed, which can accelerate the convergence of the algorithm. Experimental results on five benchmark suites and three real-world applications showed that the proposed algorithm outperforms several state-of-the-art constraint multi-objective evolutionary algorithms when dealing with CMOPs, especially for problems with complex constraints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract This paper develops a novel algorithm to solve real-world constrained optimization problems, which hybridizes multiobjective optimization techniques with an ϵ-constrained method. First, a constrained optimization problem at hand is transformed into a bi-objective optimization problem. By the transformation, the advantage of multiobjective optimization techniques can be utilized in the constrained optimization area to balance population diversity and convergence. Meanwhile, the ϵ-constrained method is applied, which keeps the population evolving toward feasible region of the constrained optimization problem. In our proposed algorithm, the differential evolution is employed as a search engine to create offspring at each generation. Further, different combinations of mutation operators have been developed to improve the search ability and the population convergence at different stages. The performance of our approach is evaluated on 64 benchmark test functions from three popular test suits. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed approach is capable of obtaining high-quality solutions on the majority of benchmark test functions, when compared with some other state-of-the-art constrained optimization algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Teaching–Learning-Based Optimization (TLBO) seems to be a rising star from amongst a number of metaheuristics with relatively competitive performances. It is reported that it outperforms some of the well-known metaheuristics regarding constrained benchmark functions, constrained mechanical design, and continuous non-linear numerical optimization problems. Such a breakthrough has steered us towards investigating the secrets of TLBO’s dominance. This paper reports our findings on TLBO qualitatively and quantitatively through code-reviews and experiments, respectively. Our findings have revealed three important mistakes regarding TLBO: (1) at least one unreported but important step; (2) incorrect formulae on a number of fitness function evaluations; and (3) misconceptions about parameter-less control. Additionally, unfair experimental settings/conditions were used to conduct experimental comparisons (e.g., different stopping criteria). The experimental results for constrained and unconstrained benchmark functions under fairly equal conditions failed to validate its performance supremacy. The ultimate goal of this paper is to provide reminders for metaheuristics’ researchers and practitioners in order to avoid similar mistakes regarding both the qualitative and quantitative aspects, and to allow fair comparisons of the TLBO algorithm to be made with other metaheuristic algorithms. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Motivated by the recent success of diverse approaches based on differential evolution (DE) to solve constrained numerical optimization problems, in this paper, the performance of this novel evolutionary algorithm is evaluated. Three experiments are designed to study the behavior of different DE variants on a set of benchmark problems by using different performance measures proposed in the specialized literature. The first experiment analyzes the behavior of four DE variants in 24 test functions considering dimensionality and the type of constraints of the problem. The second experiment presents a more in-depth analysis on two DE variants by varying two parameters (the scale factor F and the population size NP), which control the convergence of the algorithm. From the results obtained, a simple but competitive combination of two DE variants is proposed and compared against state-of-the-art DE-based algorithms for constrained optimization in the third experiment. The study in this paper shows (1) important information about the behavior of DE in constrained search spaces and (2) the role of this knowledge in the correct combination of variants, based on their capabilities, to generate simple but competitive approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: How much attention should be paid to the promising infeasible solutions during the evolution process is investigated in this paper. Stochastic ranking has been demonstrated as an effective technique for constrained optimization. In stochastic ranking, the comparison probability will affect the position of feasible solution after ranking, and the quality of the final solutions. In this paper, the dynamic stochastic selection (DSS) is put forward within the framework of multimember differential evolution. Firstly, a simple version named DSS-MDE is given, where the comparison probability decreases linearly. The algorithm DSS-MDE has been compared with two state-of-the-art evolution strategies and three competitive differential evolution algorithms for constrained optimization on 13 common benchmark functions. DSS-MDE is also evaluated on four well-studied engineering design examples, and the experimental results are significantly better than current available results. Secondly, other dynamic settings of the comparison probability for DSS-MDE are also designed and tested. From the experimental results, DSS-MDE is effective for constrained optimization. Finally, DSS-MDE with a square root adjusted comparison probability is evaluated on the 22 benchmark functions in CEC’06, and the experimental results on most functions are competitive. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]