Search

ABSTRACT The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalysis (ERA) results for July 1987 are compared with stratocumulus observations for the same period made during the First International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) Regional Experiment (FIRE). The FIRE I experiment, conducted off the coast of California, provided a comprehensive observational set of data on marine stratocumulus during July 1987. The observations reported in this paper and used as a basis for comparison with the ERA results include the mean diurnal variation of cloud cover, liquid water path, cloud-base and cloud-top height, incoming short-wave and long-wave radiation at the surface, and monthly mean vertical profiles of (potential) temperature and specific humidity. It is concluded that the ERA thermal structure in the boundary layer is quite realistic and the ERA data reveal some diurnal variability. However, in ERA the cloud thickness is overestimated and cloud cover and liquid water path are strongly underestimated as compared with the FIRE I observations. As a result the ERA downwelling short-wave radiation at the surface is much larger than observed in FIRE I. It is argued that the large difference between the ERA downwelling shortwave radiation at the surface and that observed in FIRE I can lead to large biases in the sea surface temperature in a coupled ocean-atmosphere model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Results are presented from the project Clear-sky Longwave from ERA (CLERA), in which simulations were performed of clear-sky longwave fluxes and heating rates for the period 1979-93, based on data from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Re-Analysis project (ERA). This paper presents selected results from CLERA and compares the clear-sky outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) with data from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE). Over much of the globe, especially over the oceans, the clear-sky OLR from CLERA is within the expected uncertainty in the ERBE data of 65 W m 22 . Elsewhere, there are larger differences and to study these the ERA data are compared with independent sources of information: surface synoptic observations of screen-level temperatures and retrievals of the total column moisture and upper-tro-pospheric humidity from satellite data. Over land, the largest clear-sky OLR differences occur at high latitudes in winter and these can be explained by the fact that the ERA surface temperatures are too low in these regions. However, for many other regions over land there was no obvious explanation for the clear-sky OLR differences. Over the oceans, the clear-sky OLR differences in the Tropics are consistent with known systematic biases in ERBE, the most important consequence of which is that the ERBE clear-sky OLR is too high in convective regions such as the ITCZ. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]