Search

As more adult women with young children have entered the paid labour force in the last decade, more Canadian families are seeking access to affordable child care. One might expect to observe a measurable and decided increase in coverage of child care in major media in that time. Yet, in terms of articles recorded and analyzed in four major Canadian dailies, child care has remained marginal, moving in and out of the spotlight and often all but disappearing. Even the Toronto Star, which covered the issue the most frequently of the dailies examined, had coverage that varied markedly between 2000 and 2007. By counting articles about child care, we found that the greatest jumps in coverage in all four dailies were spikes in 2000 and 2005-2006-coinciding with federal election campaigns. A closer look at the 2005-2006 period revealed that the National Post had the least extensive coverage. Nonetheless, it too had higher than its normal coverage during the campaign. At that time the newspapers' coverage nearly doubled, in all but one paper, before falling to their average (low) yearly coverage, in 2007- again, despite a continuing unmet demand for affordable child care among Canadian families. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The state's responsibility for the care of children in need of protection has been acknowledged for some time now. Most jurisdictions have set out in law the obligations and procedures by which the state is to apprehend children who are abandoned, deserted, neglected or otherwise mistreated. In North America, for example, shortly before the turn of the century, U.S. and Canadian laws provided for the apprehension of children who require protection. Over the decades these laws have been mended continually in response to increasing evidence of mistreatment of children at the hands of their guardians. In more recent times, however, the reports of mistreatment by natural guardians have been joined by allegations of improper procedures and neglect of the apprehended children at the hands of the very authorities charged with their protection. The response to these reports of misconduct has taken many forms, including the establishment of citizen advocacy groups and ombudsmen, self-monitoring by state and private agencies and court appointed guardians. The province of Alberta in Canada has taken an innovative self-monitoring approach, through the appointment of a Children's Guardian. The Children's Guardian, established in law, assumes responsibility as the legal guardian of all children who are the wards of the state. The Children's Guardian must make decisions for, monitor the care and treatment of, and advocate on behalf of these children. The Alberta approach, which has been untried heretofore, is fraught with a number of legal and administrative problems. This paper seeks to describe the inchoate efforts of the province of Alberta, through the appointment of the Children's Guardian, to better ensure that children taken under care by the state are protected and given proper care and attention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]