Search

Recycling tasks are the most effective method for reducing waste generation, protecting the environment, and boosting the overall national economy. The productivity and effectiveness of the recycling process are strongly dependent on the cleanliness and precision of processed primary sources. However, recycling operations are often labor intensive, and computer vision and deep learning (DL) techniques aid in automatically detecting and classifying trash types during recycling chores. Due to the dimensional challenge posed by pre-trained CNN networks, the scientific community has developed numerous techniques inspired by biology, swarm intelligence theory, physics, and mathematical rules. This research applies a new meta-heuristic algorithm called the artificial hummingbird algorithm (AHA) to solving the waste classification problem based on feature selection. However, the performance of the AHA is barely satisfactory; it may be stuck in optimal local regions or have a slow convergence. To overcome these limitations, this paper develops two improved versions of the AHA called the AHA-ROBL and the AHA-OBL. These two versions enhance the exploitation stage by using random opposition-based learning (ROBL) and opposition-based learning (OBL) to prevent local optima and accelerate the convergence. The main purpose of this paper is to apply the AHA-ROBL and AHA-OBL to select the relevant deep features provided by two pre-trained models of CNN (VGG19 & ResNet20) to recognize a waste classification. The TrashNet dataset is used to verify the performance of the two proposed approaches (the AHA-ROBL and AHA-OBL). The effectiveness of the suggested methods (the AHA-ROBL and AHA-OBL) is compared with that of 12 modern and competitive optimizers, namely the artificial hummingbird algorithm (AHA), Harris hawks optimizer (HHO), Salp swarm algorithm (SSA), aquila optimizer (AO), Henry gas solubility optimizer (HGSO), particle swarm optimizer (PSO), grey wolf optimizer (GWO), Archimedes optimization algorithm (AOA), manta ray foraging optimizer (MRFO), sine cosine algorithm (SCA), marine predators algorithm (MPA), and rescue optimization algorithm (SAR). A fair evaluation of the proposed algorithms' performance is achieved using the same dataset. The performance analysis of the two proposed algorithms is applied in terms of different measures. The experimental results confirm the two proposed algorithms' superiority over other comparative algorithms. The AHA-ROBL and AHA-OBL produce the optimal number of selected features with the highest degree of precision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Software defect prediction (SDP) is crucial in the early stages of defect-free software development before testing operations take place. Effective SDP can help test managers locate defects and defect-prone software modules. This facilitates the allocation of limited software quality assurance resources optimally and economically. Feature selection (FS) is a complicated problem with a polynomial time complexity. For a dataset with N features, the complete search space has 2 N feature subsets, which means that the algorithm needs an exponential running time to traverse all these feature subsets. Swarm intelligence algorithms have shown impressive performance in mitigating the FS problem and reducing the running time. The moth flame optimization (MFO) algorithm is a well-known swarm intelligence algorithm that has been used widely and proven its capability in solving various optimization problems. An efficient binary variant of MFO (BMFO) is proposed in this paper by using the island BMFO (IsBMFO) model. IsBMFO divides the solutions in the population into a set of sub-populations named islands. Each island is treated independently using a variant of BMFO. To increase the diversification capability of the algorithm, a migration step is performed after a specific number of iterations to exchange the solutions between islands. Twenty-one public software datasets are used for evaluating the proposed method. The results of the experiments show that FS using IsBMFO improves the classification results. IsBMFO followed by support vector machine (SVM) classification is the best model for the SDP problem over other compared models, with an average G-mean of 78%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]