Search

Reporting the empirical results of swarm and evolutionary computation algorithms is a challenging task with many possible difficulties. These difficulties stem from the stochastic nature of such algorithms, as well as their inability to guarantee an optimal solution in polynomial time. This research deals with measuring the performance of stochastic optimization algorithms, as well as the confidence intervals of the empirically obtained statistics. Traditionally, the arithmetic mean is used for measuring average performance, but we propose quantiles for measuring average, peak and bad-case performance, and give their interpretations in a relevant context for measuring the performance of the metaheuristics. In order to investigate the differences between arithmetic mean and quantiles, and to confirm possible benefits, we conducted experiments with 7 stochastic algorithms and 20 unconstrained continuous variable optimization problems. The experiments showed that median was a better measure of average performance than arithmetic mean, based on the observed solution quality. Out of 20 problem instances, a discrepancy between the arithmetic mean and median happened in 6 instances, out of which 5 were resolved in favor of median and 1 instance remained unresolved as a near tie. The arithmetic mean was completely inadequate for measuring average performance based on the observed number of function evaluations, while the 0.5 quantile (median) was suitable for that task. The quantiles also showed to be adequate for assessing peak performance and bad-case performance. In this paper, we also proposed a bootstrap method to calculate the confidence intervals of the probability of the empirically obtained quantiles. Considering the many advantages of using quantiles, including the ability to calculate probabilities of success in the case of multiple executions of the algorithm and the practically useful method of calculating confidence intervals, we recommend quantiles as the standard measure of peak, average and bad-case performance of stochastic optimization algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mobile robots are relevant dynamic systems in recent applications. Path planning is an essential task for these robots since it allows them to move from one location to another safely and at an affordable cost. Path planning has been studied extensively for static scenarios. However, when the scenarios are dynamic, research is limited due to the complexity and high cost of continuously re-planning the robot's movements to ensure its safety. This paper proposes a new, simple, reliable, and affordable method to plan safe and optimized paths for differential mobile robots in dynamic scenarios. The method is based on the online re-optimization of the static parameters in the state-of-the-art deterministic path planner Bug0. Due to the complexity of the dynamic path planning problem, a metaheuristic optimization approach is adopted. This approach utilizes metaheuristics from evolutionary computation and swarm intelligence to find the Bug0 parameters when the mobile robot is approaching an obstacle. The proposal is tested in simulation, and well-known metaheuristic methods are compared, including Differential Evolution (DE), the Genetic Algorithm (GA), and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). The dynamic planner based on PSO generates paths with the best performances. In addition, the results of the PSO-based planner are compared with different Bug0 configurations, and the former is shown to be significantly better. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The particle swarm optimization algorithm (PSO) is not good at dealing with discrete optimization problems, and for the krill herd algorithm (KH), the ability of local search is relatively poor. In this paper, we optimized PSO by quantum behavior and optimized KH by simulated annealing, so a new hybrid algorithm, named the annealing krill quantum particle swarm optimization (AKQPSO) algorithm, is proposed, and is based on the annealing krill herd algorithm (AKH) and quantum particle swarm optimization algorithm (QPSO). QPSO has better performance in exploitation and AKH has better performance in exploration, so AKQPSO proposed on this basis increases the diversity of population individuals, and shows better performance in both exploitation and exploration. In addition, the quantum behavior increased the diversity of the population, and the simulated annealing strategy made the algorithm avoid falling into the local optimal value, which made the algorithm obtain better performance. The test set used in this paper is a classic 100-Digit Challenge problem, which was proposed at 2019 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2019), and AKQPSO has achieved better performance on benchmark problems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]