Search

In this paper we analyze the difference between instantaneous and permanent administrative infractions, in light of article 252 of the Single Orderly Text of Law N° 27444, Law of General Administrative Procedure, approved by Supreme Decree N° 004-2019-JUS and the most approved doctrine; to then evaluate whether the infringement stipulated in the current numeral 66) of article 134 of the Regulations of the General Fishing Law, approved by Supreme Decree N° 012-2001-PE, amended by Supreme Decree N° 017-2017-PRODUCE, is an instantaneous infringement, as considered by the Sanctions Appeals Council of the Ministry of Production in Plenary Agreement N° 003-2017, by developing the legal nature of the same assumption of fact contained in the old infraction typified in numeral 101) of article 134 of the Regulations of the General Fishing Law, approved by Supreme Decree N° 012-2001-PE, modified by Supreme Decree N° 013-2009-PRODUCE, concluding that the Sanctions Appeals Council of the Ministry of Production is mistaken in considering the infraction in mention as instantaneous, because in fact is a permanent one. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present paper is intended to make known the regulation of the expiration in the General Fishing Law, Decree Law No. 25977, and its Regulations, approved by Supreme Decree No. 012-2001-PE, and in which cases it is necessary to declare it, specifically with regard to the fishing permit and the operating license of processing plants. In effect, the way in which the expiration is regulated and the reasons for which the Administration proceeds to declare it, as well as its nature, is set forth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]