Search

Objectives To compare trajectories of marriage and parenthood in individuals with JIA vs the general population. Methods Patients with JIA (n  = 4399) were identified in the Swedish National Patient Register (2001–2016) and individually matched to up to five general population comparators on birthyear, sex and residence county (n  = 21 981). Marriage and parenthood data were retrieved from the Total Population Register from age 18 y, and parenthood from the Multigeneration Register from age 15 y, respectively. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox regression adjusted for parental education, parental marital status and number of siblings. Results During a median of 6.3 years of follow-up, 362 patients with JIA and 1744 comparators got married (12.9 vs. 12.5 per 1000 person-years; HR 1.03, 95%CI 0.93-1.15). During a median of 8.8 years of follow-up, 680 patients with JIA and 3477 matched comparators became parents (17.1 vs 17.8 per 1000 person-years; HR 0.94, 95%CI 0.87-1.01). In the subgroup of patients with systemic onset JIA (SJIA), the adjusted hazard ratios for marriage and parenthood were 0.79 (95%CI 0.53-1.17) and 0.73 (95%CI 0.55-0.97), respectively. Conclusion The times to first marriage and first parenthood are similar for patients with JIA and the general population, suggesting that adolescents with JIA transition into family life along a trajectory resembling their community peers. One exception is the subgroup of patients with systemic onset JIA, who become parents for the first time at a lower rate than general population comparators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To compare mortality risk over up to 14 years of follow-up in methotrexate-refractory patients with early RA randomized to a strategy starting with addition of infliximab vs addition of SSZ and HCQ. Methods Data was from the two-arm, parallel, randomized, active-controlled, open-label Swefot trial in which patients with early RA (symptom duration <1 y) were recruited from 15 rheumatology clinics in Sweden (2002–2005). Patients who did not achieve low disease activity after 3–4 months of MTX were randomized to addition of infliximab (n  = 128) or SSZ and HCQ (n  = 130). Participants were followed until death, emigration, or end of follow-up, whichever came first. Analyses were by intention-to-treat. Results Over an average follow-up of 13 years, there were 13 and 16 deaths, respectively [8.8 vs 10.6 deaths per 1000 person-years; mortality hazard ratio 1.2 (95% CI: 0.6, 2.5); P  =0.62]. The 1-year mortality was 0.8% in both treatment arms, the 5-year mortality was 2.3% for the infliximab arm compared with 1.5% for the conventional combination treatment arm, while the 10-year mortality was 7.8% and 7.7%, respectively. After 5 years, ∼50% of patients in the conventional combination therapy arm had switched to biologic treatment, and 50% in the biologic arm had discontinued treatment with a biologic DMARD. Conclusion No difference in mortality risk could be observed over up to 14 years of follow-up between treatment strategy groups. At 5 years (3 years after trial cessation), 50% of patients remained on their assigned therapy, reflecting that DMARD combination is an adequate treatment strategy in 50% of patients. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT00764725. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. To compare work-loss in RA patients starting their first biologic with high vs moderate disease activity. Methods. We identified all RA patients aged 20-63 years in the Swedish Biologics Register who started their first biologic 2007-09 with high disease activity (DAS28 >5.1; n = 868) or moderate disease activity (DAS28 3.2-5.1; n = 854). Work days lost, defined as sick leave and disability pension days from the Swedish Social Insurance Agency, were assessed over 5 years after first bio-start. We estimated be-tween-group mean differences adjusted for age, sex, calendar year, education level, disease duration, comorbidities and work-loss the month before bio-start. Results. During 5 years after anti-TNF start, mean monthly work days lost declined from 16.0 to 9.2 (42%; P< 0.001) in patients with high disease activity at baseline and from 12.0 to 7.2 (40%; P< 0.001) in patients with moderate disease activity, with no between-group difference (adjusted mean difference 0.81; 95% CI-0.44, 2.05). Accumulated 5-year work-loss was, however, higher in the high activity group (724 vs 548 days; adjusted mean difference 70; 95% CI 20, 120), but after stratification on baseline disability pension status, no differences in accumulated work-loss were detected. Conclusion. Substantial work-loss was seen in both patients with high and patients with moderate disease activity at anti-TNF start, with a 5-year decline in mean monthly work days lost by ~40% in both groups and no between-group difference. Accumulated work-loss over 5 years was higher in the high-activity group, which may be explained by differences in baseline disability pension status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. To investigate whether disease activity at baseline influences health care costs in patients with RA initiating biologic treatment. Methods. In the Swedish Biologics Register, we identified patients with RA with baseline 28-joint DAS (DAS28) recorded and starting their first biologic in 2007-11 [n = 1638 with moderate disease activity (DAS28 3.2-5.1) and n = 1870 with high disease activity (DAS28>5.1)]. Data on inpatient and outpatient care and prescription drugs were retrieved from nationwide registers. Mean cost differences were estimated adjusted for age, sex and costs the year before treatment start. Results. Patients with high (vs moderate) disease activity were older (60 vs 56 years; P < 0.001), but did not differ in sex distribution (75 vs 74% women; P = 0.99) or disease duration (10 vs 10 years; P=0.13). The year after initiation of biologics, patients with high (vs moderate) baseline disease activity accumulated 9% higher health care costs, but the difference was not statistically significant after adjustment [E19333 vs E17810; adjusted difference E870 (95% CI -2, 1742)]. In the subgroup of patients with up to 4 years of follow-up data, decreasing costs were observed over the follow-up time, but no difference was found between patients with high compared with moderate baseline disease activity [E13 704 vs E12 349; adjusted difference 878 (95% CI -364, 2120)]. Irrespective of baseline disease activity, health care costs were approximately three times higher the year after initiation of biologics than the year before due to increased drug costs. Conclusion. Over up to 4 years of follow-up, no difference in health care costs was found after adjustment in patients starting their first biologic treatment with high vs moderate baseline disease activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives. During the past decade, the position of biologics in the therapeutic armamentarium, the number of approved indications and the number of available biologics have changed. Available data on (long-term) safety might thus pertain to patient populations not comparable with contemporary patients. The aim of this study was to assess the extent to which contemporary patients who start or switch biologic therapies are comparable with those patients who gave rise to the currently available data on effectiveness and safety.Methods. We identified all adult patients with RA (n = 9612), PsA (n = 1417) and other SpA (n = 1652) initiating a first biologic therapy between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2008, registered in the Swedish Biologics Register (ARTIS), including information on demographics, disease characteristics and 1-year risk of first-line treatment discontinuation.Results. Over calendar time, measures of disease activity at start declined substantially for all indications, and diminished between first-, second- and third-line therapy starts. One-year risks of first-line therapy discontinuation increased. Switchers to anti-TNF and non-TNF biologics had different comorbidities. Despite <50% drug retention at 5 years, most patients remained exposed to some biologic.Conclusions. The trends in baseline characteristics and drug retention underscores that any effects of biologics, including comparison between different biologics, must be interpreted in light of the characteristics of the population treated. The observed differences further call for continued vigilance to properly evaluate the safety profiles of biologic treatments as they are currently used. Exposure to multiple biologics presents a challenge for attribution of long-term effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives. A high incidence of pancreatic cancer (PCa) in patients exposed to was observed in the German biologics register. To evaluate this possible safety signal, a concerted analysis with the national biologics registers in the UK and Sweden was performed.Methods. Patients with enrolled in the British Society of Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR), the Swedish Rheumatology Register (SRR) or the German Biologics Register [Rheumatoid Arthritis Observation of Biologic Therapy (RABBIT)] were analysed. The patients were exposed to biologic or conventional DMARDs. Outcomes were obtained from physician reports, health authorities and via linkage to national cancer and death registers. Age- and gender-standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of PCa were calculated based on the expected rates available from the individual national cancer registers.Results. Data from 5126 (Germany), 16 930 (UK) and 19 351 (Sweden) RA patients were available for the analysis. The highly discrepant prescription rates of LEF in the respective countries resulted in 11 343 (Germany), 30 787 (UK) and 2518 (S) patient-years of exposure to LEF. Compared with the general population, the incidence of PCa in patients ever exposed to LEF corresponded to a SIR of 3.1 (95% CI 1.3, 6.5) in Germany, 1.05 (95% CI 0.5, 2.1) in the UK and 1.8 (95% CI 0.1, 10.2) in Sweden.Conclusion. The results of the replication analyses do not support the hypothesis of an increased risk of PCa in patients exposed to treatment with LEF. However, they do not completely rule out concerns, and therefore further verification in other data sets is recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]