Search

This paper considers a passive target localization problem based on the noisy time of arrival measurements obtained from multiple receivers and a single transmitter. The maximum likelihood (ML) estimator for this localization problem is formulated as a highly nonlinear and non-convex optimization problem, where conventional optimization methods are not suitable for solving such a problem. Consequently, this paper proposes an improved adaptive hybrid firefly differential evolution (AHFADE) algorithm, based on hybridization of firefly algorithm (FA) and differential evolution (DE) algorithm to estimate the unknown position of the target. The proposed AHFADE algorithm dynamically adjusts the control parameters, thus maintaining high population diversity during the evolution process. This paper aims to improve the accuracy of the global optimal solution by incorporating evolutionary operators of the DE in different searching stages of the FA. In this regard, an adaptive parameter is employed to select an appropriate mutation operator for achieving a proper balance between global exploration and local exploitation. In order to efficiently solve the ML estimation problem, this paper proposes the well-known semidefinite programming (SDP) method to convert the non-convex problem into a convex one. The simulation results obtained from the proposed AHFADE algorithm and well-known algorithms, such as SDP, DE and FA, are compared against Cramér–Rao lower bound (CRLB). The statistical analysis has been performed to compare the performance of the proposed AHFADE algorithm with several well-known algorithms on CEC2014 benchmark problems. The obtained simulation results show that the proposed AHFADE algorithm is more robust in high-noise environments compared to existing algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) have been successfully employed to solve many scientific and engineering problems. However, many algorithms perform ill in maintaining diversity and convergence simultaneously. In this paper, we devised a novel operator selection framework based on two collaborative indicators, generational distance (GD) and maximum spread (MS) to improve the diversity while maintaining a good convergence. By calculating the variation of GDs and MSs over the past 7 iterations, an instruction is conveyed to select a proper operator to execute next 7 iterations. This process is repeated until it reaches the maximum iteration. Two operators are embedded in this algorithm which are differential evolution operator (DE/rand/1) and our proposed crow search operator which is deemed to be efficient in explorating the search space. MOEA/D is utilized as the basis framework of our proposed algorithm. Experiments indicate that our proposed algorithm is valid and outperforms other famous algorithms in terms of diversity and convergence. In the end, a particular aeroengine maintenance scheduling problem is solved by our proposed algorithm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper proposes a novel distributed differential evolution framework called distributed mixed variants (dynamic) differential evolution ( $$dmvD^{2}E)$$ . This novel framework is a heterogeneous mix of effective differential evolution ( DE) and dynamic differential evolution ( DDE) variants with diverse characteristics in a distributed framework to result in $$dmvD^{2}E$$ . The $$dmvD^{2}E$$ , discussed in this paper, constitute various proportions and combinations of DE/best/2/bin and DDE/best/2/bin as subpopulations with each variant evolving independently but also exchanging information amongst others to co-operatively enhance the efficacy of $$dmvD^{2}E$$ as whole. The $$dmvD^{2}E$$ variants have been run on 14 test problems of 30 dimensions to display their competitive performance over the distributed classical and dynamic versions of the constituent variants. The $$dmvD^{2}E$$ , when benchmarked on a different 13 test problems of 500 as well as 1,000 dimensions, scaled well and outperformed, on an average, five existing distributed differential evolution algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]