Search

Abstract The frequency and intensity of extreme weather events (e.g. flood, drought) are predicted to increase for the foreseeable future and it is expected that these will negatively impact upon agroecosystem functioning. Our understanding of how grassland ecosystems respond to extreme weather events occurring at different times of the year, however, is lacking. To better understand the seasonal response of grassland to flooding, we subjected an agricultural grassland to an 8-week extreme flood event at three different temperatures (5 °C-winter, 15 °C-spring/autumn and 25°C-summer) and then followed its subsequent recovery for 9 weeks after floodwater removal. We focused on key indicators of ecosystem functioning including primary production, nutrient cycling, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, ammonia (NH 3) volatilization, and soil microbial communities. The experiment used intact soil mesocosms (1 kg) with indigenous vegetation collected from a grassland with no previous history of flooding. Flooding reduced biomass production by 18% at 5 °C, 50% at 15 °C and 95% at 25 °C. Flooding also significantly disrupted elemental cycling (nitrogen, phosphorus and carbon) as evidenced by an increased release of P, Fe and NH 4 + into the soil and overlying floodwater and large amounts of CH 4 and NH 3 released to the atmosphere (mainly during the flooding). These effects were more pronounced at higher temperatures (e.g. 45–700 kg CH 4 C ha−1 and 1–5 kg NH 3 N ha−1 at 15 and 25 °C, respectively). In addition, after floodwater removal this NH 4 + was rapidly nitrified leading to large losses of N 2 O (1.0–14.2 kg N 2 O N ha−1 at 5–25 °C, respectively). Especially at higher temperatures, flooding resulted in a reduction in soil microbial biomass (more than 58% of the equivalent unflooded treatment at 25 °C) and changes in microbial community structure (assessed by PLFAs). Further, some of these changes persisted after flood removal including a loss of actinomycetes, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and fungi. Overall, we conclude that ecosystem responses to extreme weather events are critically dependent on temperature with those occurring at higher temperatures having a greater negative impact than those at the lowest temperature (5 °C). The large potential release of CH 4 and N 2 O also suggests that flood events should be considered as a potential source of GHGs when comparing top-down and bottom-up calculations of national inventories, and that further work is needed to better refine GHG emission estimates for these events. Highlights • Flooding induced a rapid release of nutrients, especially at higher temperatures. • 700 kg CH 4 C ha−1 and 5 kg NH 3 N ha−1 were released in the flood phase at 25 °C. • During soil recovery, nitrification led to 1.0–14.2 kg N 2 O N ha−1 losses at 5–25 °C. • Flooding reduced soil microbial biomass, actinomycetes and arbuscular mycorrhiza. • Flooding reduced biomass production by 18% at 5 °C, 50% at 15 °C and 95% at 25 °C. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Soils around the world are being exposed to weather events which are unprecedented in recent history. To maintain the delivery of soil-related ecosystem services and to promote greater soil resilience it is essential to understand how plant-soil systems respond to these extreme events. In this study we replicated a recent period of extreme rainfall and prolonged spring flooding in a temperate grassland which had no previous history of flooding. Intact soil mesocosms (Eutric Cambisol) 1 kg weight were subjected to a simulated long-term spring flood (15 °C, 2 months) and maintained in the light with above ground indigenous vegetation (Lolium perenne L.) or dark with and without indigenous vegetation to simulate different flood typologies. In comparison to a no-flood control treatment, nutrient cycling, water quality, air quality (greenhouse gas emissions), habitat provision and biological population regulation shifts were evaluated. Flooding induced a rapid release of nutrients into the soil solution and overlying floodwater, resulting in potential nutrient losses up to 15 mg Fe, 16 mg NH 4 +, 360 mg DOC and 28 mg DON, per mesocosm. The presence of plants increased the rate of nutrient release (especially P), with the effects magnified when light transmission through the floodwater was restricted (1.3 mg P vs 0.2 mg P, per mesocosm). Flooding induced a rapid decline in redox potential and subsequent production of CH 4 , especially in the darkened treatments (10 and between 11 and 16 times higher than the control, without and with light restrictions, respectively). Upon removal of the floodwater, the accumulated NH 4 + was nitrified leading to a shift in greenhouse gas emissions, from CH 4 to N 2 O emissions. N 2 O was only significantly produced in the mesocosms kept under light restrictions (13 times higher than in other two treatments). Flooding eliminated earthworms, reduced grass production after soil recovery (from 28 g for control mesocosms to 11 g and <1 g for flooded mesocosms without and with light restrictions, respectively). Soil microbial biomass was also reduced (up to a 22–27% of the total PLFAs) and flooding induced shifts in microbial community structure, particularly a loss of soil fungi. The soil fungi content quickly recovered (4 weeks) when light was not restricted during the flood period, however, no such recovery was seen in the darkened treatments. Overall, we conclude that extreme flood events cause rapid and profound changes in soil function. Both the impact of the flooding and the time to recover is exacerbated when light is restricted (e.g. in sediment laden floodwater). In addition, our results suggest that the presence of flood-resilient plants can mitigate against some of the negative impacts of flooding on soil functioning. Highlights • Flooding eliminated earthworms and altered soil microbial community structure. • Flooding reduced the size of the microbial biomass and fungal content. • Vegetation played a vital role in preserving soil quality during flooding. • Decomposition of vegetation induced P loss in light restricted floodwater. • Impact of flooding was greater under light restricted floodwater conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]