Search

This paper proposes a metaheuristic algorithm, called advanced differential evolution (ADE), by improving the DE algorithm. The ADE algorithm was developed with the goal of creating an optimization framework that addresses the challenges of exploration and exploitation balance, avoiding local minima, utilizing chaos theory for diverse initialization, and improving solution quality and convergence speed. By incorporating these features, ADE aims to enhance the effectiveness of optimization processes. The proposed algorithm utilizes chaos theory to generate the initial population, which is subsequently divided into two sub-populations with adaptive sizes. The size of each sub-population is determined using a formula based on the number of iterations during the algorithm's execution. The first sub-population has a larger size in the beginning and the second one has a smaller size, but the total size of these two populations is always constant. The main contribution of this paper is the proposal of two novel improved differential evolution algorithms, namely MDE1 and MDE2, which are utilized for exploration within these sub-populations. The proposed ADE is tested on 29 well-known benchmarks and six engineering problems, and the results are compared with seven other algorithms. Various statistical experiments are carried out showing that the proposed algorithm provides significant superiority over other well-known algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper presents a modified metaheuristic algorithm named the modified Firefly algorithm. Any metaheuristic algorithm will have exploration and exploitation steps, and the goal of modification is to maintain a balance between them. The improvement relies on movement equations, alterations to the algorithm's structure by introducing a single loop, and a selection of movement equations at random. Two movement equations are included in the improved method and are randomly selected. This guarantees both regionally and globally focused solution-finding. This prevents the algorithm from getting stuck at a local minimum. Comparing the modified version to the original Firefly method, just one for loop is used, reducing the algorithm's complexity. The algorithm's performance is evaluated with 35 traditional benchmark test functions and 10 CEC2019 test functions. According to the findings, the suggested method performed optimally in 24 traditional benchmark test functions and best in the six remaining benchmark test functions. The improved algorithm produced the best outcomes in seven of the 10 CEC2019 test functions. In contrast, the Firefly algorithm produced optimal results in 18 classical benchmark test functions and the best results in 6 CEC2019 test functions. The proposed algorithm is compared with other variants of the Firefly algorithm for common test functions in the literature. The results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms other variants in most test functions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The lemur optimizer (LO) is a new metaheuristic algorithm that is inspired by the two primary locomotive patterns of the lemurs. However, LO suffers from improper balance between exploration and exploitation phases and sub-optimal solution stagnation due to poor exploration capability. To address these limitations, an improved lemur optimizer (ILO) with dynamic scaling factors and Gaussian mutation is introduced in this paper. The dynamic scaling factors balance the exploration and exploitation transition by dynamically adjusting their values throughout the optimization process. The proposed algorithm incorporates Gaussian mutation to induce diversity in the population and hence improve the exploration capability. The efficiency of the proposed approach is tested on 33 functions including classical benchmark and CEC-2019 test functions, and a comprehensive comparison is made with six other well-known metaheuristic algorithms. The simulation and statistical results indicate superior performance of ILO in achieving optimal solutions compared to the competing algorithms. The algorithm is further employed to address two constrained classical engineering design problems, demonstrating its robustness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper proposes the Love Evolution Algorithm (LEA), a novel evolutionary algorithm inspired by the stimulus–value–role theory. The optimization process of the LEA includes three phases: stimulus, value, and role. Both partners evolve through these phases and benefit from them regardless of the outcome of the relationship. This inspiration is abstracted into mathematical models for global optimization. The efficiency of the LEA is validated through numerical experiments with CEC2017 benchmark functions, outperforming seven metaheuristic algorithms as evidenced by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the Friedman test. Further tests using the CEC2022 benchmark functions confirm the competitiveness of the LEA compared to seven state-of-the-art metaheuristics. Lastly, the study extends to real-world problems, demonstrating the performance of the LEA across eight diverse engineering problems. Source codes of the LEA are publicly available at https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/fileexchange/159101-love-evolution-algorithm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A new swarm-based metaheuristic, namely the enriched coati osprey algorithm (ECOA), is proposed in this paper. As its name suggests, ECOA hybridizes two new metaheuristics, the coati optimization algorithm (COA) and the osprey optimization algorithm (OOA). ECOA is constructed by five searches performed sequentially by the swarm members. The first three are directed searches, while the last two are neighborhood searches. All three directed searches are adopted from COA and OOA. Meanwhile, the four-bordered neighborhood search is developed based on a new approach. During the assessment, ECOA was challenged to overcome the set of 23 functions and contended with five new metaheuristics: total interaction algorithm (TIA), golden search optimization (GSO), average and subtraction-based optimization (ASBO), COA, and OOA. The result shows that ECOA outperforms TIA, GSO, ASBO, COA, and OOA in 16, 23, 18, 21, and 21 functions. Meanwhile, the individual search test result shows that the directed searches perform better than the neighborhood searches. Moreover, the directed search toward the best member becomes the most dominant search. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]