Search

The utilization of osmosis for engineered applications sparked off various emerging technologies relying on osmotically driven membrane processes (ODMPs). Represented by forward osmosis (FO) and pressure retarded osmosis (PRO), ODMPs show great promise to leverage the global water-energy nexus and have drawn considerable attention in recent years. However, their performance in practical applications is significantly affected by membrane fouling. Membrane fouling is a complex problem and is associated with the foulant deposition, concentration polarization and reverse solute diffusion (RSD) in ODMPs. The current paper provides a comprehensive review on membrane fouling in ODMPs with a focus on the elaboration of the factors and mechanisms governing the fouling behavior. Among those fouling factors and mechanisms, some are also applicable for pressure-driven membrane processes (e.g., reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF)), such as the effects of hydrodynamic conditions, feedwater composition, and membrane material and properties, and the cake-enhanced concentration polarization (CE-CP) mechanism. Others are unique for ODMPs, such as the effects of draw solution composition and membrane orientation, the internal concentration polarization (ICP) self-compensation effect, and the RSD-enhanced fouling. A general osmotic-resistance filtration model for ODMPs is presented in this paper to assist in the interpretation of the intrinsic interrelationships among those fouling factors and mechanisms. The impact and mechanisms of membrane fouling on contaminates removal are also reviewed briefly based on the limited existing literature on this topic. Finally, the available membrane fouling control strategies for ODMPs are summarized upon understanding the cause and effect of fouling. Based on the current review, future research prospects are proposed for further studying the membrane fouling in ODMPs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The performance of a forward osmosis (FO) system may be characterised by the assessment parameters: FO–RO flux ratio (J w/J w(RO)), apparent FO water permeability (J w/(π ds − π ml)), and the newly developed flux efficiency factor (J w,ob/J w,re). The former two parameters offer information on extent of internal concentration polarisation and driving force utilisation, respectively. The J w,ob/J w,re factor has practical relevance, and reveals the inevitable trade-off between flux and recovery (φ) for a FO system. The derived J w,ob/J w,re factors corresponded well to experimental observations. High water permeability, low salt-to-water permeability ratio, and large mass transfer coefficient improve the performance of a FO system, but these may also be influenced by operational and fouling effects, such as draw solute transmission, fouling resistance and cake-enhanced concentration polarisation. It was shown that membrane properties also play a significant role in fouling behaviour. Fouling amelioration factors include aeration and osmotic backwash. A thin-film composite membrane showed potential for FO application with favourable intrinsic transport parameters. It was demonstrated that a FO system could achieve stable water production with both relatively high flux efficiency (J w,ob/J w,re =0.8) and high recovery (φ =95.8%), which attested to the technology potential. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Forward osmosis (FO) is attracting increasing interest for its potential applications in water and wastewater treatment and desalination. One of the major drawbacks of FO is internal concentration polarization (ICP), which significantly limits the FO flux efficiency. In addition, FO membrane flux can be adversely affected by membrane fouling. The effects of ICP and fouling on FO flux behavior were systematically investigated in the current study. Both theoretical model and experimental results demonstrated that the FO flux was highly non-linear with respect to the apparent driving force (the concentration difference between the draw solution and the feed water) as a result of ICP. ICP played a dominant role on FO flux behavior at greater draw solution concentrations and/or greater membrane fluxes due to the exponential dependence of ICP on flux level. Compared to the active layer facing draw solution (AL-facing-DS) configuration, more severe ICP was observed when the membrane active layer faced the feed water (AL-facing-FW) as a result of dilutive ICP in the FO support layer. Interestingly, the AL-facing-FW configuration showed remarkable flux stability against both dilution of the bulk draw solution and membrane fouling. In this configuration, any attempt to reduce membrane flux was compensated by a reduced level of ICP. The net result was only a marginal flux reduction. In addition, foulant deposition was insignificant in this configuration. Thus, the AL-facing-FW configuration enjoyed inherently stable flux, however, at the expense of severer initial ICP. In contrast, the AL-facing-DS configuration suffered severe flux reduction as porous membrane support faced the humic acid containing feed water. The flux loss in this configuration was likely due to the combined effects of (1) the internal clogging of the FO support structure as well as (2) the resulting enhanced ICP in the support layer. The latter was caused by reduced porosity and reduced mass transfer coefficient of the support. The pore clogging enhanced ICP mechanism probably played a dominant role in FO flux reduction at higher flux levels. To the authors’ best knowledge, this is the first study to systematically demonstrate the coupled effects of ICP and fouling on the FO flux behavior. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]