Search

What politics means is an open question, but there is no doubt that politics is meaningful. Politics and language are inseparable. Political discourse is a discourse of influence aimed at influencing the audience to mobilize to act, to think, to consider etc. It is obvious that the linguistic reality grafted onto the political one, highlights the essential role of language, its field of manifestation, while the political outcomes are those based on which the selection operates both from terminology point of view and from that of discursive strategies of course. These ideas support the hypothesis that the language, discursive strategy and political strategy are interdependent. This article offers some theoretical perspectives on the study of language and politics, and provides an essential introduction to political discourse analysis. The paper will explore some responses to the seemingly naive question "What is Political Discourse Analysis?". Instead of being normative, in the sense of wanting to prescribe what political discourse analysis should be, it rather aims to be programmatic in another, more analytical way, and try to provide some answers to the question what could be an adequate way of ‘doing' political discourse analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the current state of the Romanian language, the slang refined as an inventory of terms predisposed for encrypting communicated realities, but also as structural organization. The phenomenon is driven by technological kinetics, by assuming many terms borrowed as consumer units in the expression of certain social groups, by the emotional involvement of slangers in the new lexical constructions. The platform on which the current slang is stored represents the colloquial language, where we notice, on one hand, a spiritual predisposition for the slang creativity and, on the other hand, a specialization of terms for the role of units generating slang, becoming kind attractors and hence the slang clusters bases. In this paper, we propose not to follow the path of slang terms, but only to analyze the stylistic elements identified in a corpus of selected texts, especially in the online version of communication. In this regard, we appreciate anticipatory that the analyzed structures evade the linguistic norms, developing random generally adding directly to the need for picturesque and the encryption intention of messages by the speaker. Also, related to the current language, slangs are functional valves through which unlimited, unusual combinations of terms enter, which, in relation to the host language, are overbidding stylistic elements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Orphic myth of creating and maintaining the reality through the word isn't merely a legend. Daily we face with verbal representations which are interpreted differently depending on the power with which these are pronounced. The word "power" comprises here a variety of processes, strategies, methods of obtaining and preserving the power. The present paper attempts to present a linguistic analysis from Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) point of view, of some concrete manifestations of politico-diplomatic language's power. This paper approaches the method of analysis of argumentation in discourse, which apply pragmatic and rhetoric elements aiming at examining the way under which interact a locator and his receiver, exercising a reciprocal influence on each other through their discourse and verbal representation. The paper, finally hopes to offer a glimpse into the use of pragmatic modalities which influence the discursive relation between interlocutors. It emphasize on the analysis of politico-diplomatic discourse's evolution from modal point of view. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]