This paper discusses the relationship between science, technology and women. Thus, it resorts to the history of science and gender as a theorethical instrument because it provides a new way to interrogate reality, visualizing new analytical categories in order to explain aspects of reality that had not been taken into account. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
*PARADIGM (Theory of knowledge), *TRANSLATING & interpreting, *THEORY of knowledge, *SCIENCE
Abstract
The concepts of 'paradigm', 'incommensurability' and 'rule' are still widely used. Thomas Kuhn applied them to refer to the way in which science could be organized. The problem is that The Structure of Scientific Revolutions is quoted as a case of epistemological discussion, rather than a case of an historical perspective on science. In this paper Kuhn's use of these concepts is commented upon to show that this position has no other backing than a particular vision of science as exposed in the context of the 1950's and 1960's in the United States. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
*SCIENCE, *PHILOSOPHY, *TRUTH, *REALITY, *THEORY of knowledge
Abstract
This paper studies the relationship between science and philosophy in the works of Carlos Vaz Ferreira. The idea of "search of truth" is the key to understand the role played by both science and philosophy in human knowledge, and their respective scopes and limits. According to Vaz Ferreira, science and philosophy are not mutually exclusive, but rather complementary; moreover, they do not exhaust the wealth of ways that humans have of acciesing reality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
*PLURALISM, *PHILOSOPHY, *POSITIVISM, *THEORY of knowledge, *SCIENCE
Abstract
In this paper I will try to offer a synthesis between two conflicting epistemological positions on the recent philosophical scene: positivism, whose heritage survives as the belief that science is the most genuine form of knowledge, and the defenders of incommensurability. Overcoming the controversy implies rejecting both the classical conception of knowledge (knowledge as theoria) --which, in fact, both positions presuppose-- and the hierarchical view of knowing in favour of a systemic view permitting epistemological pluralism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Published
2004
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.