Search

Estimation of the number and geo-location of oil wells is important for policy holders considering their impact on energy resource planning. With the recent development in optical remote sensing, it is possible to identify oil wells from satellite images. Moreover, the recent advancement in deep learning frameworks for object detection in remote sensing makes it possible to automatically detect oil wells from remote sensing images. In this paper, we collected a dataset named Northeast Petroleum University–Oil Well Object Detection Version 1.0 (NEPU–OWOD V1.0) based on high-resolution remote sensing images from Google Earth Imagery. Our database includes 1192 oil wells in 432 images from Daqing City, which has the largest oilfield in China. In this study, we compared nine different state-of-the-art deep learning models based on algorithms for object detection from optical remote sensing images. Experimental results show that the state-of-the-art deep learning models achieve high precision on our collected dataset, which demonstrate the great potential for oil well detection in remote sensing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stereo photogrammetric survey used to be used to extract the height of buildings, then to convert the height to number of stories through certain rules to estimate the number of stories of buildings by means of satellite remote sensing. In contrast, we propose a new method using deep learning to estimate the number of stories of buildings from monocular optical satellite image end to end in this paper. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to directly estimate the number of stories of buildings from monocular satellite images. Specifically, in the proposed method, we extend a classic object detection network, i.e., Mask R-CNN, by adding a new head to predict the number of stories of detected buildings from satellite images. GF-2 images from nine cities in China are used to validate the effectiveness of the proposed methods. The result of experiment show that the mean absolute error of prediction on buildings whose stories between 1–7, 8–20, and above 20 are 1.329, 3.546, and 8.317, respectively, which indicate that our method has possible application potentials in low-rise buildings, but the accuracy in middle-rise and high-rise buildings needs to be further improved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]