Search

C60 is a nanomaterial produced from the pyrolysis of hydrocarbons that needs to be extracted and purified to obtain the desired properties. Previous studies reported purification as the environmental hotspot of the C60 production process. However, no study has evaluated existing C60 purification methods and proposed alternatives based on environmental, cost, and chemical hazards. Here we used life cycle assessment (LCA) and evaluated the most common existing C60 purification methods (chromatography-crystallization, crystallization, & complexation) and identified selective complexation with 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) as the greenest existing C60 purification technique that has less environmental (70% from chromatography-crystallization & 50% from crystallization), cost (70% from chromatography-crystallization & 80% from crystallization), and chemical (30% from chromatography-crystallization & crystallization) hazards. The solvent (1,2,4-trymethylbenzene (TMB)) was identified as the environmental hotspot contributing to more than 95% of the cumulative energy demand (CED) of the complexation process. We employed green chemistry principles and an iterative approach to assess the performance of potential replacements (linseed oil, olive oil, toluene, & xylene) for TMB. Although we evaluated solvents that are expected to be greener than petroleum-based solvents, we determined toluene as the greenest alternative. Compared to the baseline complexation method, using toluene reduced the environmental impact by 59%, cost by 85%, and chemical hazards by 42%. Identifying toluene as the alternative green solvent for C60 purification can reduce the carbon footprint of C60-containing products used for various emerging applications, such as solar cells, hydrogen storage, biofuels, etc., which aligns with current decarbonization strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Evaluate organic transparent photovoltaics (TPV) for buildings in the US. • Transparent photovoltaics produce electricity and reduce energy consumption. • Life cycle assessment is used to calculate the net energy benefit. • The energy payback time varies from 51 days to 1.1 years depending on the location. Transparent photovoltaics is a new technology that can be used in buildings applications to simultaneously save energy and produce electricity. This study evaluates the potential of transparent photovoltaic (TPV) in window and skylight applications for four cities in the United States: Detroit, Los Angeles, Phoenix and Honolulu. Building energy demand simulation, photovoltaic generation, and life cycle assessment (LCA) are combined to evaluate the net energy benefit (NEB). The use of TPV on windows is evaluated for both new windows, for which the solar cell is deposited in the interior surface of the glass pane, and for the refurbishment of existing windows, for which plastic encapsulated solar cells are placed on the interior surface of existing windows. The NEB was found to be positive for all scenarios considered, and the cradle to gate energy to manufacture a transparent organic photovoltaic module was found to be negligible. The NEB was used to calculate the energy return on investment (EROI) and the energy payback time (EPBT). Both were found to be either better or comparable to other photovoltaic technologies. For glass modules, the best EROI was 102 in Phoenix for window and 208 in Honolulu for skylights. The EPBT varied from 51 days to 1.1 years, depending on the location and type of module. The use of transparent photovoltaics in the US was found to have both environmental and cost benefits due to the combined reduction in building energy consumption and electricity production. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]