Search

Immobilization of enzymes on the solid supports can improve the stability as well as catalytic properties of enzymes. In this study, biochar derived from various feedstocks were used as immobilization support considering biochars carbon negative as well as sustainable properties. Partially purified (concentrated) crude laccase was covalently immobilized onto pine wood (BC-PW), pig manure (BC-PM) and almond shell (BC-AS) micro-biochars using optimized 5% w/v glutaraldehyde. Moreover, citric acid pretreatment improved the laccase binding capacity of all the micro-biochars and the highest laccase binding of 40.2 ± 1.8 U g −1 was observed with BC-PM in comparison with raw BC-PM (34.1 ± 1.1 U g −1 ). The enhanced binding of laccase on BC-PM over wood derived biochars was attributed to the higher surface area (46.1 m 2  g −1 ) of BC-PM. Moreover, feedstock selection as well as a method of production influenced the biochar physicochemical properties such as surface area and consequently, different biochars showed various laccase immobilization efficiencies. BC-PW showed better pH, thermal, storage, and operational stability, compared with BC-AS and BC-PM. While applying the laccase bound micro-biochar, complete removal was observed in 2 h under batch mode with 0.5 g of laccase bound BC-PM at an environmentally relevant concentration of 500 µg L −1 in wastewater effluent. About 40% of the laccase activity was retained with all the laccase-bound micro-biochars after 5 cycles of diclofenac treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diclofenac (DCF) is a prevalent anti-inflammatory drug used throughout the world. Intensive researches carried out in the past few decades have confirmed the global ubiquity of DCF in various environmental compartments. Its frequent occurrence in freshwater environments and its potential toxicity towards several organisms such as fish and mussels makes DCF an emerging environmental contaminant. At typical detected environmental concentrations, the drug does not exhibit toxic effects towards living organisms, albeit chronic exposure may lead to severe effects. For DCF, about 30–70% removal has been obtained through the conventional treatment system in wastewater treatment plant being the major primary sink. Thus, the untreated DCF will pass to surface water. DCF can interact with other inorganic contaminants in the environment particularly in wastewater treatment plant, such as metals, organic contaminants and even with DCF metabolites. This process may lead to the creation of another possible emerging contaminant. In the present context, environmental fate of DCF in different compartments such as soil and water has been addressed with an overview of current treatment methods. In addition, the toxicity concerns regarding DCF in aquatic as well as terrestrial environment along with an introduction to the metabolites of DCF through consumption as well as abiotic degradation routes are also discussed. Further studies are required to better assess the fate and toxicological effects of DCF and its metabolites and must consider the possible interaction of DCF with other contaminants to develop an effective treatment method for DCF and its traces. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]