Search

A resolving set S of a graph G is a subset of its vertices such that no two vertices of G have the same distance vector to S. The Metric Dimension problem asks for a resolving set of minimum size, and in its decision form, a resolving set of size at most some specified integer. This problem is NP-complete, and remains so in very restricted classes of graphs. It is also W[2]-complete with respect to the size of the solution. Metric Dimension has proven elusive on graphs of bounded treewidth. On the algorithmic side, a polynomial time algorithm is known for trees, and even for outerplanar graphs, but the general case of treewidth at most two is open. On the complexity side, no parameterized hardness is known. This has led several papers on the topic to ask for the parameterized complexity of Metric Dimension with respect to treewidth. We provide a first answer to the question. We show that Metric Dimension parameterized by the treewidth of the input graph is W[1]-hard. More refinedly we prove that, unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fails, there is no algorithm solving Metric Dimension in time f (pw) n o (pw) on n-vertex graphs of constant degree, with pw the pathwidth of the input graph, and f any computable function. This is in stark contrast with an FPT algorithm of Belmonte et al. (SIAM J Discrete Math 31(2):1217–1243, 2017) with respect to the combined parameter tl + Δ , where tl is the tree-length and Δ the maximum-degree of the input graph. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We revisit the maximum satisfiability problem (Max-SAT) in the data stream model. In this problem, the stream consists of m clauses that are disjunctions of literals drawn from n Boolean variables. The objective is to find an assignment to the variables that maximizes the number of satisfied clauses. Chou et al. (FOCS 2020) showed that Ω (n) space is necessary to yield a 2 / 2 + ε approximation of the optimum value; they also presented an algorithm that yields a 2 / 2 − ε approximation of the optimum value using O (ε − 2 log ⁡ n) space. In this paper, we not only focus on approximating the optimum value, but also on obtaining the corresponding Boolean assignment using sublinear o (m n) space. We present randomized single-pass algorithms that w.h.p.1 yield: • A 1 − ε approximation using O ˜ (n / ε 3) space and exponential post-processing time • A 3 / 4 − ε approximation using O ˜ (n / ε) space and polynomial post-processing time. Our ideas also extend to dynamic streams. However, we show that the streaming k -SAT problem, which asks whether one can satisfy all size- k input clauses, must use Ω (n k) space. We also consider the related minimum satisfiability problem (Min-SAT), introduced by Kohli et al. (SIAM J. Discrete Math. 1994), that asks to find an assignment that minimizes the number of satisfied clauses. For this problem, we give a O ˜ (n 2 / ε 2) space algorithm, which is sublinear when m = ω (n) , that yields an α + ε approximation where α is the approximation guarantee of the offline algorithm. If each variable appears in at most f clauses, we show that a 2 f n approximation using O ˜ (n) space is possible. Finally, for the Max-AND-SAT problem where clauses are conjunctions of literals, we show that any single-pass algorithm that approximates the optimal value up to a factor better than 1/2 with success probability at least 2/3 must use Ω (m n) space. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]