Search

This paper proposes a target specialized meta-heuristic optimization algorithm, called Mixture Design Threshold Accepting (MDTA) algorithm, which applies the idea of the Threshold Accepting to generate the corresponding approximate D-optimal designs for a wide range of mixture models, with or without constraints imposed on the components. The MDTA algorithm is tested by many of common mixture models, among which some even have no solutions of the D-optimal design available in the literature. Other tests include 5 models with specific upper bound constraints. These results prove that the MDTA algorithm is very efficient in finding D-optimal designs for mixture models. In some scenarios it even outperforms the state-of-art algorithms, such as the ProjPSO algorithm and the REX algorithm. The source codes of the MDTA algorithm are freely available by writing to the first author. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• This paper proposes an enhanced SCA algorithm variant, called ARSCA. • ARSCA improves the convergence accuracy and avoids premature convergence. • This paper compares ARSCA with classical algorithms, variations of other algorithms. • ARSCA is applied to six engineering design problems and its results are satisfactory. The sine cosine algorithm (SCA) is a well-known meta-heuristic optimization algorithm. SCA has received much attention in various optimization fields due to its simple structure and excellent optimization capabilities. However, the dimension of objective function also increases with the increasing complexity of optimization tasks. This makes the original SCA appear to have insufficient optimization capability and likely to fall into premature convergence. A multi-mechanism acting variant of SCA, called ARSCA, is proposed to address the above deficiencies. ARSCA is an enhanced SCA algorithm based on the adaptive quadratic interpolation mechanism (AQIM) and Rounding mechanism (RM). RM enables a more balanced state between exploration and exploitation of the ARSCA. AQIM enhances local exploitation capabilities. To verify the performance of ARSCA, we compared ARSCA with some advanced traditional optimization algorithms and variants of algorithms for 30 consecutive benchmark functions of IEEE CEC2014. In addition, ARSCA was applied to 6 constrained engineering optimization problems. These six algorithms include the tension–compression spring design problem, the welded beam design problem, the pressure vessel design problem, the I-beam design problem, the speed reducer design problem, and the three-bar design problem. Experimental results show that ARSCA outperforms its competitors in both the solution quality and the ability to jump out of the local optimum. The relevant codes for the paper are publicly available at https://github.com/YangXiao9799/paper_ARSCA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• This paper proposes an enhanced SCA algorithm variant, called ARSCA. • ARSCA improves the convergence accuracy and avoids premature convergence. • This paper compares ARSCA with classical algorithms, variations of other algorithms. • ARSCA is applied to six engineering design problems and its results are satisfactory. The sine cosine algorithm (SCA) is a well-known meta-heuristic optimization algorithm. SCA has received much attention in various optimization fields due to its simple structure and excellent optimization capabilities. However, the dimension of objective function also increases with the increasing complexity of optimization tasks. This makes the original SCA appear to have insufficient optimization capability and likely to fall into premature convergence. A multi-mechanism acting variant of SCA, called ARSCA, is proposed to address the above deficiencies. ARSCA is an enhanced SCA algorithm based on the adaptive quadratic interpolation mechanism (AQIM) and Rounding mechanism (RM). RM enables a more balanced state between exploration and exploitation of the ARSCA. AQIM enhances local exploitation capabilities. To verify the performance of ARSCA, we compared ARSCA with some advanced traditional optimization algorithms and variants of algorithms for 30 consecutive benchmark functions of IEEE CEC2014. In addition, ARSCA was applied to 6 constrained engineering optimization problems. These six algorithms include the tension–compression spring design problem, the welded beam design problem, the pressure vessel design problem, the I-beam design problem, the speed reducer design problem, and the three-bar design problem. Experimental results show that ARSCA outperforms its competitors in both the solution quality and the ability to jump out of the local optimum. The relevant codes for the paper are publicly available at https://github.com/YangXiao9799/paper_ARSCA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]