Search

Objective: To investigate the prevalence of three additional ultrasound markers, placental dichotomy, cardiomegaly and 'starry-sky' liver, in monochorionic twin pregnancy with twin anemia-polycythemia sequence (TAPS).Methods: All monochorionic twin pregnancies, diagnosed antenatally with TAPS at our center between 2006 and 2019, were reviewed retrospectively for the presence of placental dichotomy, cardiomegaly in the donor twin and a starry-sky liver in the recipient twin. TAPS was diagnosed based on delta middle cerebral artery (MCA) peak systolic velocity (PSV) > 0.5 multiples of the median. The primary outcome was the prevalence of placental dichotomy, cardiomegaly, starry-sky liver and at least one of these markers in both spontaneous and post-laser TAPS. The secondary outcome was the prevalence of these ultrasound markers according to the antenatal stage of TAPS.Results: A total of 91 monochorionic twin pregnancies with TAPS were eligible for analysis. Placental dichotomy was observed in 44% (40/91) of TAPS cases. A total of 70% (64/91) of the TAPS donors developed cardiomegaly and a starry-sky liver was identified in 66% (53/80) of the TAPS recipients. The prevalence of cardiomegaly and starry-sky liver was roughly comparable between spontaneous and post-laser TAPS (69% (33/48) vs 72% (31/43) and 64% (25/39) vs 68% (28/41), respectively). Pregnancies with spontaneous TAPS showed a higher prevalence of placental dichotomy compared with post-laser TAPS (63% (30/48) vs 23% (10/43)). At least one of the three ultrasound markers was detected in 86% (78/91) of TAPS cases, meaning that 14% (13/91) of cases presented solely with discordant MCA-PSV values. There was a trend towards increased prevalence of all three ultrasound markers with increasing antenatal TAPS stage.Conclusions: Placental dichotomy, fetal cardiomegaly and a starry-sky liver are commonly found in TAPS pregnancy. Investigating the presence of these ultrasound markers can be of additional help in improving antenatal detection of TAPS in monochorionic twin pregnancy. © 2019 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) occurs in monochorionic twin pregnancies when unequal placental sharing leads to restriction in the growth of just one twin. Management options include laser separation of the fetal circulations, selective reduction or expectant management, but what constitutes the best treatment is not yet known. New trials in this area are urgently needed but, in this rare and complex group, maximizing the relevance and utility of clinical research design and outputs is paramount. A core outcome set ensures standardized outcome collection and reporting in future research. The objective of this study was to develop a core outcome set for studies evaluating treatments for sFGR in monochorionic twins.Methods: An international steering group of clinicians, researchers and patients with experience of sFGR was established to oversee the process of development of a core outcome set for studies investigating the management of sFGR. Outcomes reported in the literature were identified through a systematic review and informed the design of a three-round Delphi survey. Clinicians, researchers, and patients and family representatives participated in the survey. Outcomes were scored on a Likert scale from 1 (limited importance for making a decision) to 9 (critical for making a decision). Consensus was defined a priori as a Likert score of ≥ 8 in the third round of the Delphi survey. Participants were then invited to take part in an international meeting of stakeholders in which the modified nominal group technique was used to consider the consensus outcomes and agree on a final core outcome set.Results: Ninety-six outcomes were identified from 39 studies in the systematic review. One hundred and three participants from 23 countries completed the first round of the Delphi survey, of whom 88 completed all three rounds. Twenty-nine outcomes met the a priori criteria for consensus and, along with six additional outcomes, were prioritized in a consensus development meeting, using the modified nominal group technique. Twenty-five stakeholders participated in this meeting, including researchers (n = 3), fetal medicine specialists (n = 3), obstetricians (n = 2), neonatologists (n = 3), midwives (n = 4), parents and family members (n = 6), patient group representatives (n = 3), and a sonographer. Eleven core outcomes were agreed upon. These were live birth, gestational age at birth, birth weight, intertwin birth-weight discordance, death of surviving twin after death of cotwin, loss during pregnancy or before final hospital discharge, parental stress, procedure-related adverse maternal outcome, length of neonatal stay in hospital, neurological abnormality on postnatal imaging and childhood disability.Conclusions: This core outcome set for studies investigating the management of sFGR represents the consensus of a large and diverse group of international collaborators. Use of these outcomes in future trials should help to increase the clinical relevance of research on this condition. Consensus agreement on core outcome definitions and measures is now required. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome is a procedure for which no objective tools exist to assess technical skills. To ensure that future fetal surgeons reach competence prior to performing the procedure unsupervised, we developed a performance assessment tool. The aim of this study was to validate this assessment tool for reliability and construct validity.Methods: We made use of a procedure-specific evaluation instrument containing all essential steps of the fetoscopic laser procedure, which was previously created using Delphi methodology. Eleven experts and 13 novices from three fetal medicine centers performed the procedure on the same simulator. Two independent observers assessed each surgery using the instrument (maximum score: 52). Interobserver reliability was assessed using Spearman correlation. We compared the performance of novices and experts to assess construct validity.Results: The interobserver reliability was high (Rs  = 0.974, P < 0.001). Checklist scores for experts and novices were significantly different; the median score for novices was 28/52 (54%), whereas that for experts was 47.5/52 (91%) (P < 0.001). The procedure time and fetoscopy time were significantly shorter (P < 0.001) for experts. Residual anastomoses were found in 1/11 (9%) procedures performed by experts and in 9/13 (69%) procedures performed by novices (P = 0.005). Multivariable analysis showed that the checklist score, independent of age and gender, predicted competence.Conclusions: The procedure-specific assessment tool for fetoscopic laser surgery shows good interobserver reliability and discriminates experts from novices. This instrument may therefore be a useful tool in the training curriculum for fetal surgeons. Further intervention studies with reassessment before and after training may increase the construct validity of the tool. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]