1. Journal Editors' Views on the Criteria a Paper Must Meet to Be Publishable
- Author
-
Lounds, Julie, Oakar, Margaret, Knecht, Katryn, Moran, Michael, Gibney, Martha, and Pressley, Michael
- Subjects
- *
PERIODICAL publishing , *STANDARDS , *PERIODICAL editors - Abstract
Editors of archival psychological and educational journals were asked to rate the importance of 38 potential standards that can be used to judge publishability of a paper. The standards included classic internal and external validity standards as well as writing standards and criteria pertaining to the visibility of issues in the paper and the author of the paper. The editors rated most of the standards as at least somewhat important, although some were rated as very important to absolutely essential. There was a significant correlation between editor''s ratings of criterial importance and the likelihood of standards being met in published studies. Some potential publication standards are more critical than others in determining publishability, with the ratings generated here providing some guidance about which standards are especially important to meet in preparing a paper for publication consideration. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]
- Published
- 2002
- Full Text
- View/download PDF