Search

An integrated approach is proposed in this paper to incorporate the group heterogeneity into the framework of natural disposability and managerial disposability, which allows evaluating the CO 2 emission performance under different mitigation strategies (scale-oriented strategy and innovation-oriented strategy). It is able to deal with the intertemporal incomparability when adopting a global technology. In the empirical study, we categorized China's 27 manufacturing sectors into five groups and evaluated their emission performance under different mitigation strategies during 2003–2016. According to the empirical results, we found that there is still much potential (about 70%–80%) for improving the CO 2 emission performance considering the entire manufacturing industry. From the perspective of different groups, the global technologies/innovators group shows the highest emission efficiency, while the energy-/resource-intensive commodities' group performed the worst. Besides, different sectors showed significant technology heterogeneity. Finally, the desirable CO 2 mitigation strategies varied with the different groups. For the labor-intensive tradables' group, we found that the desirable strategy is to decrease the input of energy and other production factors, i.e. scale-oriented strategy. For the regional processing group, the innovation-oriented strategy is more efficient. • Modified global meta-frontier non-radial DDF approach is proposed. • Group heterogeneity is incorporated in natural/managerial disposability framework. • CO 2 emissions performance for China's manufacturing sectors is measured. • Global technologies/innovators group performs best, while energy-/resource-intensive commodities group performs worst. • Desirable mitigation strategies varies with respect to technology heterogeneity of different groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]