Search

Summary: Identifying maximum penetration level (MPL) of Solar Photo‐Voltaic Generation (SPVG) in the distribution system is crucial for system planners and network operators to keep the system parameters within the acceptable limits. This paper provides a systematic and extensive procedure for evaluation of MPL of SPVG and its enhancement methods in distribution systems. More importantly, it illustrates a novel algorithm for affixing the penetration cap of Solar PV. The methodology initially derives a new stability index for locating SPVGs in the system, including both active and reactive power support from SPVGs. The study shows the utility of redefining MPL of SPVGs by considering the reactive power injection through solar inverters also. Deviating from the practice of considering the conventional constraints of voltage rise and maximum loading for MPL estimation, the paper considers loss minimization as the major constraint. The algorithm has potential to identify distributed integration scenario of SPVGs compared to the limited number of placements in the extant algorithms. This paper provides a novel algorithm to evaluate of maximum penetration level (MPL) of solar photo voltaic generation (SPVG) and its enhancement methods in distribution systems. The utility of redefining the MPL of SPVG by considering the reactive power injection through solar inverter is illustrated. The algorithm has distinct advantages over the extant algorithms in identifying a distributed integration scenario. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: The continuous increase of the distributed energy resources (DERs) penetration levels leads to voltage stability problems in the distribution system. One of the approaches for the mentioned emerging challenge is the proper placement of automatic voltage regulators (AVRs). This paper investigates the optimal placement and sizing of AVRs in a distribution network by presenting a new modification of the teaching‐learning‐based optimization (TLBO) algorithm. The objective functions consist of minimizing the distribution system voltage deviation, energy generation cost, and electrical losses. The modification improves the convergence velocity and accuracy of the TLBO algorithm using the combination of mutation technique and quasi‐opposition‐based‐learning concept. This paper compares the performance of the proposed algorithm with other famous evolutionary algorithms. The test distribution system contains installed DERs that work more efficiently after the placement of AVRs based on the mentioned objective functions by the proposed optimization algorithm. The simulation results display the best optimization algorithms for AVRs placement with a significant level of less than 0.10 (ie, probability‐value). The proposed multiobjective optimization algorithm's considerable merit is the accuracy and convergence velocity in solving this specific optimization problem. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

SUMMARY Distributed generation (DG) systems are small-scale power generation technologies that offer better reliability of supply, reduced transmission, and distribution losses and cost. The benefits of DG greatly depend on their placement and size. Most of the existing analytical methods developed so far are applicable for single DG installation only. Further, in meta-heuristic-based methods, location and sizing problem of DG were dealt separately in which optimal locations are identified with sensitivity-based methods, and optimal sizing is obtained using meta-heuristic algorithms which may lead to incorrect location and suboptimal sizing. In this paper, a novel method that employs harmony search algorithm with differential operator is proposed to install multiple DG units optimally in distribution system with an objective of minimizing active power loss and improving voltage profile. The proposed method is tested on 33-bus and 69-bus radial distribution systems to demonstrate its performance and efficacy. Results show that the proposed method is superior to existing methods in quality of solution. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]