Search

Geospatial data conflation is the process of identifying and merging the corresponding features in two datasets that represent the same objects in reality. Conflation is needed in a wide range of geospatial analyses, yet it is a difficult task, often considered too unreliable and costly due to various discrepancies between GIS data sources. This study addresses the reliability issue of computerized conflation by developing stronger optimization-based conflation models for matching two network datasets with minimum discrepancy. Conventional models match roads on a feature-by-feature basis. By comparison, we propose a new node-arc conflation model that simultaneously matches road-center lines and junctions in a topologically consistent manner. Enforcing this topological consistency increases the reliability of conflation and reduces false matches. Similar to the well-known rubber-sheeting method, our model allows for the use of network junctions as "control" points for matching network edges. Unlike rubber sheeting, the new model is automatic and matches all junctions (and edges) in one pass. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first optimized conflation model that can match nodes and edges in one model. Computational experiments using six road networks in Santa Barbara, CA, showed that the new model is selective and reduces false matches more than existing optimized conflation models. On average, it achieves a precision of 94.7% with over 81% recall and achieves a 99.4% precision when enhanced with string distances. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Geospatial data conflation involves matching and combining two maps to create a new map. It has received increased research attention in recent years due to its wide range of applications in GIS (Geographic Information System) data production and analysis. The map assignment problem (conceptualized in the 1980s) is one of the earliest conflation methods, in which GIS features from two maps are matched by minimizing their total discrepancy or distance. Recently, more flexible optimization models have been proposed. This includes conflation models based on the network flow problem and new models based on Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP). A natural question is: how are these models related or different, and how do they compare? In this study, an analytic review of major optimized conflation models in the literature is conducted and the structural linkages between them are identified. Moreover, a MILP model (the base-matching problem) and its bi-matching version are presented as a common basis. Our analysis shows that the assignment problem and all other optimized conflation models in the literature can be viewed or reformulated as variants of the base models. For network-flow based models, proof is presented that the base-matching problem is equivalent to the network-flow based fixed-charge-matching model. The equivalence of the MILP reformulation is also verified experimentally. For the existing MILP-based models, common notation is established and used to demonstrate that they are extensions of the base models in straight-forward ways. The contributions of this study are threefold. Firstly, it helps the analyst to understand the structural commonalities and differences of current conflation models and to choose different models. Secondly, by reformulating the network-flow models (and therefore, all current models) using MILP, the presented work eases the practical application of conflation by leveraging the many off-the-shelf MILP solvers. Thirdly, the base models can serve as a common ground for studying and writing new conflation models by allowing a modular and incremental way of model development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]