Search

Melanoma is the most lethal form of skin cancer, which is intrinsically resistant to conventional chemotherapy. Combination therapy has been developed to overcome this challenge and show synergistic anticancer effects on melanoma. Notably, the histone deacetylase inhibitor, valproic acid (VPA), has been indicated as a potential sensitizer of chemotherapy drugs on various metastatic cancers, including advanced melanoma. In this study, we explored whether VPA could serve as an effective sensitizer of chemotherapy drug etoposide (ETO) on B16-F10 and SK-MEL-2-Luc melanoma cell lines in response to drug-induced DNA damages. Our results demonstrated that the VPA-ETO simultaneous combined treatment and ETO pretreated sequential combined treatment generated higher inhibitory effectivities than the individual treatment of each drug. We found the VPA-ETO simultaneous combined treatment contributed to the synergistic inhibitory effect by the augmented DNA double-strand breaks, accompanied by a compromised homologous recombination activity. In comparison, the ETO pretreated sequential combined treatment led to synergistic inhibitory effect via enhanced apoptosis. Surprisingly, the enhanced homologous recombination activity and G2/M phase arrest resulted in the antagonistic effect in both cells under VPA pretreated sequential combined treatment. In summary, our findings suggested that sequential order and effective dose of drug administration in VPA-ETO combination therapy could induce different cellular responses in melanoma cells. Such understanding might help potentiate the effectiveness of melanoma treatment and highlight the importance of sequential order and effective dose in combination therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Obesity has been conceptualized as a highly heterogeneous condition. We aim to investigate chamber-specific effects of obesity on the heart and relevant outcomes. A total of 2944 symptom-free individuals (age: 47.5 ± 10.0 years), free of known cardiovascular diseases were classified into four categories based on body mass index (BMI) (as normal-weight (NW) vs. overweight/obese (O)) and metabolic status (metabolically-healthy (MH) vs. unhealthy (MU)). Epicardial adipose thickness (EAT) using echocardiography method. Speckle-tracking based atrio-ventricular (LA/LV) deformations including global longitudinal strain (GLS) and peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) were also analyzed. MUNW had higher cardiometabolic risks and more impaired diastolic and GLS/PALS than MHNW phenotype. Both MHO and MUO phenotypes exhibited worst atrial functions. Greater EAT was independently associated with worse GLS and PALS after correcting for various anthropometrics, LV mass and LA volume, respectively, with unfavorable LA effects from EAT being more pronounced in the NW phenotypes (both p interactions < 0.05). During a median follow-up period of 5.3 years, BMI/EAT improved the reclassification for atrial fibrillation (AF) incidence (p for net reclassification improvement < 0.05) mainly in the NW phenotypes (p interaction < 0.001). Categorization of clinical obesity phenotypes based on excessive visceral adiposity likely provides increment prognostic impacts on atrial dysfunction, particularly in non-obese phenotypes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aortic root diameter (AoD) has been shown to be a marker of cardiovascular risk and heart failure (HF). Data regarding the normal reference ranges in Asians and their correlates with diastolic dysfunction using contemporary guidelines remain largely unexplored. Methods: Among 5343 consecutive population-based asymptomatic Asians with echocardiography evaluations for aortic root diameter (without/with indexing, presented as AoD/AoDi) were related to cardiac structure/function and N-terminal pro-brain B-type natriuretic peptide (Nt-ProBNP), with 245 participants compared with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT)-based aortic root geometry. Results: Advanced age, hypertension, higher diastolic blood pressure, and lower body fat all contributed to greater AoD/AoDi. The highest correlation between echo-based aortic diameter and the MDCT-derived measures was found at the level of the aortic sinuses of Valsalva (r = 0.80, p < 0.001). Age- and sex-stratified normative ranges of AoD/AoDi were provided in 3646 healthy participants. Multivariate linear regressions showed that AoDi was associated with a higher NT-proBNP, more unfavorable left ventricular (LV) remodeling, worsened LV systolic annular velocity (TDI-s′), a higher probability of presenting with LV hypertrophy, and abnormal LV diastolic indices except tricuspid regurgitation velocity by contemporary diastolic dysfunction (DD) criteria (all p < 0.05). AoDi superimposed on key clinical variables significantly expanded C-statistic from 0.71 to 0.84 (p for ∆AUROC: < 0.001). These associations were broadly weaker for AoD. Conclusion: In our large asymptomatic Asian population, echocardiography-defined aortic root dilation was associated with aging and hypertension and were correlated modestly with computed tomography measures. A larger indexed aortic diameter appeared to be a useful indicator in identifying baseline abnormal diastolic dysfunction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) had caused huge health losses worldwide. Several drugs had been applied to treat patients with COVID-19, and repurposing colchicine had been proposed for its anti-inflammatory properties via several pathways. In this systematic review, we evaluated the effects of colchicine treatment. From inception to May 31, 2021, databases, including PubMed, EMbase, medRxiv, and Research Square were searched, and 11 studies were enrolled. A total of 17,205 COVID-19 patients with male predominance (62.9%) were analyzed. Patients with colchicine treatment had a significantly lower risk of mortality (odds ratio (OR): 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.38–0.87, I2: 72%; p < 0.01) and a non-significantly lower rate of mechanical ventilation (OR: 0.67, 95%CI: 0.39–1.15). The side effects were mild and not significantly different (OR: 2.03, 95%CI: 0.51–8.09). Subgroup analysis with randomized controlled trials showed no statistically significant difference in the mortality (OR: 0.80, 95%CI: 0.44–1.46, I2: 33%; p = 0.22). In conclusion, our meta-analysis found that colchicine treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality in patients with COVID-19. However, this benefit was not observed in the subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials. Further randomized controlled studies are required to confirm the potential benefits of colchicine treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]