1. Research using qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods and choice based on the research.
- Author
-
McCusker, K. and Gunaydin, S.
- Subjects
- *
ACADEMIC medical centers , *ATTITUDE (Psychology) , *ARTIFICIAL blood circulation , *CLINICAL medicine research , *DECISION making , *QUALITATIVE research , *OCCUPATIONAL roles , *QUANTITATIVE research , *RESEARCH personnel - Abstract
Research is fundamental to the advancement of medicine and critical to identifying the most optimal therapies unique to particular societies. This is easily observed through the dynamics associated with pharmacology, surgical technique and the medical equipment used today versus short years ago. Advancements in knowledge synthesis and reporting guidelines enhance the quality, scope and applicability of results; thus, improving health science and clinical practice and advancing health policy. While advancements are critical to the progression of optimal health care, the high cost associated with these endeavors cannot be ignored. Research fundamentally needs to be evaluated to identify the most efficient methods of evaluation. The primary objective of this paper is to look at a specific research methodology when applied to the area of clinical research, especially extracorporeal circulation and its prognosis for the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF