Search

The United States armed-forces-and-society intersection is explored comparing attitudes toward the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan among West Point, Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC), and civilian undergraduates. A survey was administered in January and February 2003 to determine if military affiliation is associated with attitudes toward sending troops into Afghanistan after the war started and Iraq before sending troops. Majorities of all students supported both war efforts, though United States Military Academy at West Point and ROTC cadets are somewhat more supportive of both wars compared to civilian students. However, most differences are explained by students' gender and political affiliation, suggesting that differences between groups result from selection effects rather than cultural differences. The authors contend a fourth wave in civil-military affairs potentially has emerged in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 through a civil-military attitude fusion complicated by a gender-politics gap. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Analyzes the moral issues surrounding the U.S. wars. Background on the slaughter of My Lai villagers in Vietnam in 1968 as a result of the U.S.-Vietnam War; Assault by the U.S. on Iraq in 2003 ; Terrorist attack on the U.S. on September 11, 2001.