Search

Production activities of modern economies are ultimately sustained by depletion of non-renewable fossil fuels. In the perspective of non-renewables displacement, an accurate evaluation of energy embodied in goods and services is crucial in order to select among alternative products or policies. Economic-based Input-Output models are widely used for this purpose: however, due to the increasing amount of international trades of products, definition of appropriate methods to account for the energy embodied in trades is nowadays crucial. In this paper, international trades treatment methods in Input-Output analysis are comprehensively formalized and applied to a case study based on the World Input-Output Database (WIOD). Energy embodied in final demand and in detailed products of key national energy sectors have been evaluated for the WIOD countries according to Single-Region and Multi-Regional models. It is found that an inappropriate use of international trades treatment models may produce very inaccurate estimations of numerical values of embodied energy. Three country groups has been identified, characterized by different ranges of fractions of imported/exported primary fossil fuels: Single-Region method A returns best results for countries of Group 1, with high values of fossil exports and low values of fossil imports; Multi-Regional method C is to be preferred for countries of Group 2, with high values of fossil imports and low values of fossil exports; finally, Single-Region method B returns lower deviations compared to other methods for countries of group 3, with low values of fossil imports and exports. This paper aims at supporting researchers in the field of Life Cycle Assessment in the application of Environmentally extended Input-Output analysis, finding the best trade-off between the efforts due to data collection and the accuracy of results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

One of the most controversial topics in energy analysis consists in the internalization of the effects of human labor in the embodied energy requirements of goods and services. In this paper, the Bioeconomic Input-Output model is proposed to address such issue: it consists in a partially closed Hybrid Input-Output model in which the production of human labor is internalized within the economy as a new productive sector. The human labor sector absorbs a portion of the national final demand, while it produces working hours in order to sustain the national economic activities. The Bioeconomic model causes a reallocation of the total energy embodied in the production of goods and services due to two overlapping effects: a change in the national production technology due to the definition of the human labor sector, and a reduction in the available final demand for the consumptions of the households. The Bioeconomic and the standard Input-Output models are comparatively applied for the analysis of (1) the energy embodied in goods and services produced by the Italian economy in 2010, and (2) the primary energy requirements of alternative dishwashing solutions in Italy. Specific embodied energy in Italian products increases by less than 5% for mining and energy industries, by 5–15% for manufacturing industries and by 15–70% for tertiary sectors. On the other hand, the energy embodied in total production from each sector may be lower or greater (from −20% to +50%) with respect to results of the standard Input-Output model. Moreover, it is found that the energy embodied in dishwashing by hand and by dishwasher in Italy increases respectively by 62% and by 35% if the Bioeconomic model is adopted. Based on these results, Authors argue that human labor should methodically be included alongside the supply chain of goods and services in both embodied energy analysis and life-cycle assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]