Search

Background Minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS), a postmortem procedure that uses core needle biopsy samples and does not require opening the body, may be a valid alternative to complete autopsy (CA) in highly infectious diseases such as coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). This study aimed to (1) compare the performance of MITS and CA in a series of COVID-19 deaths and (2) evaluate the safety of the procedure. Methods From October 2020 to February 2021, MITS was conducted in 12 adults who tested positive before death for COVID-19, in a standard, well-ventilated autopsy room, where personnel used reinforced personal protective equipment. In 9 cases, a CA was performed after MITS. A thorough histological evaluation was conducted, and the presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was evaluated by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry. Results The diagnoses provided by MITS and CA matched almost perfectly. In 9 patients, COVID-19 was in the chain of events leading to death, being responsible for diffuse alveolar damage and mononuclear T-cell inflammatory response in the lungs. No specific COVID-19 features were identified. Three deaths were not related to COVID-19. All personnel involved in MITS repeatedly tested negative for COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 was identified by RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry in the MITS samples, particularly in the lungs. Conclusions MITS is useful for evaluating COVID-19–related deaths in settings where a CA is not feasible. The results of this simplified and safer technique are comparable to those of CA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: Recent evidence has confirmed two independent pathways in the development of vaginal squamous cell carcinoma (VaSCC): one related to and the other independent of human papillomavirus (HPV). The aim of our study was to evaluate whether HPV status has prognostic significance in this neoplasm. Methods: All confirmed primary VaSCCs diagnosed and treated from 1995 to 2009 in two institutions were retrospectively evaluated (n=57). HPV infection was detected by PCR using SPF-10 primers and typed with the INNO-LIPA HPV assay and p16INK4a expression by immunohistochemistry. Disease-free and overall survival (DFS and OS) were analyzed by Kaplan–Meier analysis with the log-rank test and a multivariate Cox proportional hazard''s model. Results: HR-HPV DNA was detected in 70.2% patients. HPV16 was the most prevalent genotype (67.5% of cases). p16INK4a was positive in 97.5% HPV-positive and 17.6% HPV-negative tumors (p<.001). FIGO stage was associated with DFS (p=.042) and OS (p=.008). HPV-positive tumors showed better DFS (p=.042) and OS (p=.035) than HPV-negative tumors. Multivariate analysis confirmed better DFS and OS of HPV-positive patients independent of age and stage. This reduced risk of progression and mortality in HPV-positive patients was limited to women with FIGO stages I and II tumors (HR=0.26; 95% CI 0.10–0.69; p=0.006). Conclusions: HPV-positive early stage (FIGO I and II) VaSCCs have a better prognosis than early HPV-negative tumors. HPV detection and/or p16INK4a immunostaining can be easily implemented in routine pathology and should be considered as valuable prognostic biomarkers in the study of patients with VaSCC. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]