Search

Background: Routine total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a short cemented stem as compared with a standard length cemented stem may have benefits in terms of stress distribution, bone preservation, stem subsidence and ease of revision surgery. Two senior arthroplasty surgeons transitioned their routine femoral implant from a standard 150 mm Exeter V40 cemented stem to a short 125 mm Exeter V40 cemented stem for all patients over the course of several years. We analysed revision rates, adjusted survival, and PROMS scores for patients who received a standard stem and a short stem in routine THA. Methods: All THAs performed by the two surgeons between January 2011 and December 2021 were included. All procedures were performed using either a 150 mm or 125 mm Exeter V40 stem. Demographic data, acetabular implant type, and outcome data including implant survival, reason for revision, and post-operative Oxford Hip Scores were obtained from the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR), and detailed survival analyses were performed. Primary outcome was revision for any reason. Reason for revision, including femoral or acetabular failure, and time to revision were also recorded. Results: 1335 THAs were included. 516 using the 150 mm stem and 819 using the 125 mm stem. There were 4055.5 and 3227.8 component years analysed in the standard stem and short stem groups respectively due to a longer mean follow up in the 150 mm group. Patient reported outcomes were comparable across all groups. Revision rates were comparable between the standard 150 mm stem (0.44 revisions/100 component years) and the short 125 mm stem (0.56 revisions/100 component years) with no statistically significant difference found (p = 0.240). Conclusion: Routine use of a short 125 mm stem had no statistically significant impact on revision rate or PROMS scores when compared to a standard 150 mm stem. There may be benefits to routine use of a short cemented femoral implant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: A total of 894 hips were evaluated to describe the survivorship of Exeter cemented femoral stems and report the outcomes and complications of our 'Exeter- era', and there is no study from Central or Eastern Europe demonstrating similar results. Methods: Between January 2000 and December 2009, a total of 894 hips were included who underwent Exeter universal and V40 femoral stems with a mean follow up of 13 years. Cemented Exeter low profile polyethylene cups were used in 889 patients (99.4%) cups. Harris hip score (HHS) was used and statistical outcome measures were calculated with revision as an endpoint for aseptic loosening of the stem, aseptic loosening of any component, all-cause revision of the stem, and all-cause revision of the hip. Results: A total of 103 patients died and 129 (14.4%) operated hips were lost to follow-up before ten years. Out of the 662, ten stems (1.5%) were revised for aseptic loosening. Aseptic loosening of any component was the reason for revision in 43 cases (6.5%), consisting of 40 cup revisions and ten stem exchanges. Periprosthetic fracture occurred in 17 cases (1.9%) Periprosthetic joint infection occurred in 18 cases (2.01%). Three cups were exchanged for recurrent dislocation, and two stems had broken. Conclusion: Exeter hip system has provided reproducible results across different centres worldwide, as it did in our series. Thorough surgical and cementing technique is of utmost importance for achieving these results. The cup is the weak point of the system and use of a hybrid system is worth considering. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The true incidence of periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) around cemented polished taper-slip implants remains largely unknown. Registries usually only capture PFFs that result in revision, missing those managed non-operatively or treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). This study reports the long-term rate of PFF with the original triple-tapered C-stem femoral implant. Materials and methods: A prospective review of a consecutive series of 500 primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed at a single centre between March 2000 and December 2005, with average follow-up of 15 years (12–19 years). Results: There were 500 consecutive THAs in 455 patients. Seven PFFs (1.4%) occurred in seven patients at an average of 7.9 years (range 2–11.5) from the primary arthroplasty. Five PFFs were managed by ORIF, one Vancouver B3 fracture was revised for a loose implant and one patient was treated non-operatively. Average age at primary operation was 74 years (67–87) and BMI averaged 27.3 (22–31). There was no typical fracture pattern and no statistically significant associations with patient demographics (age, gender, BMI, diagnosis) or prosthetic details (size, offset, alignment, cement mantle, subsidence). Survivorship to the occurrence of PFF was 99% (97.3–99.6%) at 10 years and 97.8% (95.5–99.0%) at 15. Conclusion: A PFF rate of 1.4% at an average follow-up of 15 years represents the true incidence of PFF with the use of the original triple-tapered C-Stem femoral implant, similar to that of published Exeter series (1.85%) but lower than the CPT (3.3%). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Exposure of the acetabular component during revision total hip arthroplasty is often difficult and stems are often difficult to remove. Polished and tapered cemented stems are easily removed and can be easily reconstructed by either cement-in-cement or in-cement technique. This study was a retrospective review of the medium-term outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty conducted with the Exeter stem fixed by cement-in-cement or in-cement method in four institutions.Methods: This study included hips (n = 103) reconstructed by cement-in-cement or in-cement technique on the femoral side during revision total hip arthroplasty in four institutions between 2003 and 2015. The mean age at surgery was 71.1 years (range, 43-86 years), and the mean follow-up period was 5.6 years (range, 0-13 years).Results: Revision arthroplasty was required for acetabular component complications in 69 hips, for dislocation in 25, for infection in eight, and for stem fracture in one hip. Re-revision was required in 10 hips for: infection (n = 6), acetabular component complications (n = 3), and dislocation (n = 1). No radiographic loosening, cement fractures, or osteolysis of the femoral components were observed. Ten-year survival rate was 99% with the endpoint of femoral revision surgery, and 100% with the endpoint of femoral aseptic loosening.Conclusions: The medium-term outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty on the femoral side conducted using the cement-in-cement or in-cement technique were favourable, with no cases of aseptic loosening. As long as the bone-cement interface remains robust, there is no need to remove all the cement, and the cement-in-cement or in-cement technique should be used for reconstruction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]