Search

The purpose given work emerges the delimitation of the subject to anthropology and culturology on attitude them to sciences of art and in analogies with scientifically-artistic complex trivium-quаdrivium of Muddle ages and Renaissance. The methodological base is a hermeneutic-cоmpаrаtive method, outgoing from the intonation approach, accepted in science, as from musicology-science of literature and linguistics up to the heory of the kinematograph as defined in works A. Kanarskiy, E. Kuc, O. Markovf, A. Sokolova and other. General science methods, analytical and historian-descriptive, which formed including methodological bases taken to study of the scientific areas to anthropologies and culturology (R. Bаrthes, Yu. Boguckiy, S. Krymskiy, O. Markova, V. Sheiko, O. Spengler), also essential for cognition of the sought regularities and generalizations. The scientific novelty of the study is defined originality of the theoretical principle of the delimitation considered scientific discipline, as well as novelty of the collations of the subject row of the study. Conclusions. Cultural science based on notion of the culture, derived by root importance of the term ("cult"!), defining quality and target purpose that "processing" (lat culture – "processing"), personifying ideal determination, but realization symbolism last emerges the art, given to primevel activity. The anthropology, as biological in the first place science with semiotic-rationalist directivity of the presentation to human essence, rests in logically-life relatedness subject-quality, forming production-consumer chain of actions, including ideal-cultural output. And culturology, as well as anthropology reproduce complex of collations of the different sciences in demonstrations of its specifics, reminding quаdrivium of Muddle ages-Renaissance in consent with nеоrenaissance and nеоbаrocco measurements of the epoches of the modern style and postmodern of XX–XXI sentures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of the article is to reveal the status of culturology in the system of scientific knowledge and its connection with world anthropological schools. The conceptual methodological core of the research is system analysis of culturology as a social and cultural phenomenon for the disclosure of its structural and value-semantic aspects; dialogue and historical-comparative methods for understanding the mechanisms of interaction of culturological and anthropological national schools. Scientific Novelty. For the first time, it is scientifically substantiated that the dominant determinants of the formation of culturology as an al ternative to Western cultural and social anthropology are the conflict of traditions of two axiologically different socio-cultural environments and ideological differences in modeling the cultural process in the globalization space (the dichotomy of Western liberal and communist doctrines). It has been established that the vector of development of culturological and anthropological national schools is due to the historical and cultural process and socio-cultural realities; mechanisms of their interaction are revealed. Conclusions. The moderators of the formation of culturology as a science, its subject field and architectonics are revealed. The evolution of the paradigm basis of culturology and its connection with the national anthropological schools are traced: their identity and difference have been established. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the article we can read about the interpretation of Hegel's philosophical system in the philosophy of the XXth century. Author states that modern social reality can be considered as a consequence of philosophical reflection concerning questions, which were self-evident in pre-Modern times and didn't need any reflection. At the same time examples of modern reflection became a canon that needed its own interpretation. Considering this fact, it has been show how relations between subject and object were comprehended (designed) in different interpretive traditions of Hegel's philosophy and how it influenced the legitimization of a new form of social reality, which is called Modernity. There are three ways of interpreting (designing) Hegel's philosophy depending on the fact what is understood as a subject, which should coincide with a substance: anthropologic, in which a person is understood as a subject, ontological, in the case of which subject is understood as an objective reality, and theological, in which subject is a God. Basing on such classification, author proves that by expounding the system in Hegel's philosophy understanding of a subject as a substance and at the same time as self-consciousness is legitimized. Subject (self-consciousness) becomes a reason and world's logic and its history is a Spirit's self-detection. After that an imanentization of reality and its transformation into one-dimensional one takes place, in which any other dimension is impossible in principle (logically) and the main sense of this subject is a maximum “realization” of itself in the earthly world with the greatest mastery of objectivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Artistic practices of postmodern art do not only express the principles of the conceptions of the world of modern culture but on the whole they prepare the anthropological "project" of a cosmopolit. But the danger of leveling and even ruining the system of the Ukrainian world outlook traditions exists in the framework of this project. In this article the author investigates the peculiarities of Yu. Andrukhovych' creative work in the context of the Ukrainian postmodern art. Thanks to the ironic form and extreme spontaneity in the choice of dedication and epigraph, postulates themodel in which the contextual neo-mythological features are traced and the features reveal the essential peculiarities of the anthropological project of a "post-totalitarian" person. The author's tragic world-outlook and apocalypticalmood are hidden behind the humor and eclectic glare. It doesn't look like "banquet during the plague", but like the comprehension of the problem of one's existence under the totally new historiccultural conditions. The neo-mythological axis is grounded on the Christian-mythological model-antithesis. The neo-mythological peculiarities analyzed by the author interact with each other in the dialectical unity and make the organic entirety of the artistic work, they are actual for a contemporary person finding himself under the conditions of a transitional period when culture is looking for stable landmarks in its development. It is proved that the neomyth byYu.Andrukhovychwas being built on the synthesis ofChristianity and folk culture, ascertainingthe European characterof the Ukrainian culture and surge for its legitimacy, uniting together the Dianetical and Apologian features. It gave the author the chance to model the modern culture in the coordinates "Bu - bo - bu" (Burlesque -Booth - Buffoonery) and build the anthropological project in the direction of a Cosmopolitan pole. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article actualizes the problem of the anthropological dimensions ofmusic art on the basis of the influence of aesthetic emotions. The basis adopted three main provisions. First, the essence of the Genesis sound and emotional complexes appears in their emotional interpretation.We investigated the emotional influence of music on people in the history of aesthetic thought. Provided that the original essence of music is the history of human consciousness and subconsciousness. The leading concept in the anthropology ofmusic, there are phenomena that are inherent as a deep structure in the development of European culture.Music expresses the consciousness on the physical, mental and spiritual levels. Culture as one of the highest forms of social organization of human consciousness is forced to structure his consciousness through the external form, including through art. This avoids a state of isolation, an inability to develop. Music, unlike other arts, and develops a person's ability to holistic perception. This ability is generated by music, is then in all kinds of human activities and exacerbate the perception of aesthetic values. Acting on the moral qualities of students, music is a means of formation of Outlook of the person. Using the associative and musical means, the composer directs the thoughts and emotions of the listener at a certain object, turning a pointless sentiment in the higher feelings and aspirations of targeted. The analysis of influence ofmusical art on human, proven antropologmusic. Musical artmodels using the intonation of the question of value wealth, the logic and the dynamics of human mirootnosheniya, organizes spiritual communication between people and generations. Acting on the identity of his socotroco, the music evokes a very specific set of associations that is the basis of the understanding of man'smusical content in all its facets. The latter is national, temporary, individual-psychological, which is addressed to the outside world, or reflects the inner condition. This complex constitutes the core of knowledge about the person formed a specific historical period, specific social conditions that carries music. Music art summarizes, updates and enriches the experience of mankind, is a means of formation of a spiritualized relationship to the world, which are based on abilities and needs of human aesthetic experiences. The music establishes the experience of age, generally expressed in philosophical thinking. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]