Search

Universal opt-out antenatal screening for Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is not currently recommened and it is recommended that maternity services offer risk-based testing. We aimed to investigate antenatal HCV testing and adherence to testing guidance. A cross-sectional survey was circulated to maternity service providers between November–December 2020 which included testing policy, training for healthcare staff, and management of women found to be HCV positive. Descriptive data are presented. A total of 75 questionnaires were returned, representing 48 % of English maternity service providers. 87 % of providers reported offering antenatal HCV risk-based testing. Risk factors used to identify pregnant women for testing varied. Less than 15 % of respondents considered women that were ever homeless or with history of incarceraton or from higher HCV prevalence areas as high risk. Current antenatal HCV testing practices are inadequate and HCV infection likely goes undiagnosed in pregnancy, especially among vulnerable population groups. In the absence of universal antenatal screening, re-framing antenatal HCV risk-based testing and management as a quality improvement initiative and developing HCV specific pathway guidance for maternity units is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

New case‐finding opportunities are needed to achieve hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination in England by the year 2030. HCV antenatal testing is not offered universally in England but is recommended for women with risk factors for HCV (e.g. injecting drug use, being born in a high‐prevalence country). The aim of this analysis was to investigate the missed opportunities for HCV antenatal testing among women who had given birth and were subsequently diagnosed with HCV at some time after childbirth. By linking data on live births (2010–2020) to laboratory reports of HCV diagnoses (1995–2021), we identified all women who were diagnosed with HCV after the date of their first childbirth. This group was considered to potentially have experienced a missed opportunity for HCV antenatal testing; HCV‐RNA testing and treatment outcomes were also obtained for these women. Of the 32,295 women who gave birth between 2010 and 2020 with a linked diagnosis of HCV (median age: 34 years, 72.1% UK‐born), over half (n = 17,123) were diagnosed after childbirth. In multivariable analyses, the odds of being diagnosed with HCV after childbirth were higher in those of Asian Bangladeshi, Black African or Chinese ethnicity and among those born in Africa. Over four‐fifths (3510/4260) of those eligible for treatment were linked to treatment, 30.7% (747/2435) of whom had a liver scarring level of at least moderate and 9.4% (228/2435) had cirrhosis. Given the potential opportunity to identify cases of HCV with targeted case‐finding through antenatal services, universal opt‐out testing should be considered in these settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multiple gestations experience a slowing of fetal growth in the third trimester and have been described as having a higher risk of growth restriction. Whether this increased diagnosis of fetal growth restriction is physiological or pathologic is controversial. In an attempt to better identify those fetuses most at risk, twin-specific growth charts have been developed and tested. In addition, there are data to suggest that multiple gestations experience an increased risk of unexpected third-trimester stillbirth in apparently uncomplicated pregnancies. This chapter reviews the current data and recommendations for fetal growth assessment, antenatal surveillance, and delivery timing in uncomplicated multiple gestations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) is spreading globally and migration flows play an important role. • HTLV-1once-in-life testing should be recommended for HIV, and hepatitis B and C. • HTLV-1 targeted screening should be recommended for pregnant women, blood donors, and at sexually transmitted infection clinics. • In the transplantation setting, HTLV-1 universal screening should be mandatory. • Improvements in the specificity of HTLV screening tests are urgently needed. Human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) infection is spreading globally at an uncertain speed. Sexual, mother-to-child, and parenteral exposure are the major transmission routes. Neither vaccines nor antivirals have been developed to confront HTLV-1, despite infecting over 10 million people globally and causing life-threatening illnesses in 10% of carriers. It is time to place this long-neglected disease firmly into the 2030 elimination agenda. Current evidence supports once-in-life testing for HTLV-1, as recommended for HIV, hepatitis B and C, along with targeted screening of pregnant women, blood donors, and people who attended clinics for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Similar targeted screening strategies are already being performed for Chagas disease in some Western countries in persons from Latin America. Given the high risk of rapid-onset HTLV-1-associated myelopathy, universal screening of solid organ donors is warranted. To minimize organ wastage, however, the specificity of HTLV screening tests must be improved. HTLV screening of organ donors in Europe has become mandatory in Spain and the United Kingdom. The advent of HTLV point-of-care kits would facilitate testing. Finally, increasing awareness of HTLV-1 will help those living with HTLV-1 to be tested, clinically monitored, and informed about transmission-preventive measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The primary objective of this study was to ascertain if among women with fetal growth restriction (FGR; estimated fetal weight [EFW] < 10th percentile) the frequency of severe FGR (sFGR; EFW < 3rd percentile for gestational age) differed among various classes of obesity. This was a retrospective cohort study of all pregnancies complicated by FGR from August 2016- March 2019 at a single center, undergoing weekly antenatal surveillance (biophysical profiles and umbilical artery Doppler). Exclusion criteria included multiple gestation, prenatally diagnosed fetal anomalies, and unknown maternal body mass index (BMI) at the time of the ultrasound exam. We defined fetal growth restriction as an estimated fetal weight less than the 10th percentile for gestational age using Hadlock criteria. Severe FGR was defined as the estimated fetal weight below 3rd percentile for gestational age. Maternal BMI was categorized as non-obese (BMI ≤ 29.9), Class I obesity (30.0–34.9), and Class II or III obesity (≥35.0 kg/m2). Abnormal Dopplers were defined as absent or reversed end diastolic flow. Maternal characteristics and ultrasound findings were compared between groups. Categorical variables were compared by χ2 or Fisher's exact test and continuous variables were compared by t test or nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals by adjusting for potential confounders including maternal age, hypertensive disorders, pre-gestational and gestational diabetes, auto-immune disorders, and gestational age at diagnosis. Of 974 women that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 678 (70%) were not obese, 151 (15%) had class I obesity, and 145 (15%) had class II or III obesity. Obese women were significantly more likely to be multiparous and had a lower mean gestational age at diagnosis of FGR. Hypertensive disorders were more common with increasing BMI, as was type II diabetes mellitus (p <.01). There were no statistically significant differences between the obesity groups with regards to other comorbidities. Women with obesity classes I and II/III had significantly higher frequency of severe FGR (37.8%) as compared to non-obese women (29%; p <.05). The rates of abnormal Dopplers was more frequent with worsening obesity: 31.4%, 34.4%, and 46.2% for non-obese, class I obesity, and class II or III obesity, respectively (p <.01). There were no significant differences in amniotic fluid abnormalities or antenatal testing results. After adjustment for potential confounders, women with class I obesity had higher odds of having severe FGR (aOR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.0–2.1). There was also an increased odds of abnormal Dopplers among women with class II/III obesity, as compared to non-obese women, after adjusting for confounders (aOR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.2–2.6). Among women with FGR, obese women were more likely to have severe FGR and abnormal Dopplers compared to non-obese women. These findings warrant further study into predictors of adverse outcomes among obese women with FGR. Such information could be useful in counseling patients as to the possible course of disease after diagnosis of fetal growth restriction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization which is the production of antibodies in response to foreign red cell antigen(s) may occur through exposure to cells or tissues from a genetically different member of same species via transfusion, transplantation or pregnancy. It may cause hemolytic disease of fetus and newborn (HDFN). Usually the incidence of HDFN due to irregular erythrocyte antibody is rare in primigravida. Here we report a primigravida pregnant woman who developed multiple alloantibodies and the neonate developed severe HDFN. A 36-year-old primigravida pregnant woman who had no history of significant medical issues except surgery done for severe endometriosis 1 year back and she had no history of previous blood transfusion presented to us for delivery. The antibody screening came out to be positive with a reaction in cell I and cell II of the antibody screening panel. Further, a mixture of anti D + anti C + anti E alloantibodies were identified using 16 cells panel, select cells and red cell phenotyping. The neonate developed severe HDFN which was managed with phototherapy, exchange transfusion and IvIg. There was no exposure history for sensitization except bleeding in early 2nd trimester. There was a significant discrepancy among mother, father and neonate Rh phenotype which was resolved with clinical history of Invitro fertilization (IVF) with sperm donation. This index case illustrates the need of antibody screening in primigravida antenatal women specially for Rh D negative high risk cases. It also shows importance of Rh Kell typing in sperm donors for future transfusion support of the child. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective  We sought to quantify the distribution of stillbirths by gestational age (GA) in a contemporary cohort and to determine identifiable risk factors associated with stillbirth prior to 32 weeks of gestation. Study Design  Population-based case-control study of all stillbirths in the United States during the year 2014, utilizing vital statistics data, obtained from the National Center for Health Statistics. Distribution of stillbirths were stratified by 20 to 44 weeks of GA, in women diagnosed with stillbirth in the antepartum period. Pregnancy characteristics were compared between those diagnosed with stillbirth <32 versus ≥32 weeks of gestation. Multivariate logistic regression estimated the relative influence of various factors on the outcome of stillbirth prior to 32 weeks of gestation. Results  There were 15,998 nonlaboring women diagnosed with stillbirth during 2014 in the United States between 20 and 44 weeks. Of them, 60.1% (n  = 9,618) occurred before antenatal fetal surveillance (ANFS) is typically initiated (<32 weeks) and 39.9% (n  = 6,380) were diagnosed at ≥32 weeks. Women with stillbirth prior to 32 weeks were more likely to be of non-Hispanic Black race (29.0 vs. 23.9%, p  < 0.001), nulliparous (53.8 vs. 50.6%, p  = 0.001), have chronic hypertension (CHTN; 6.0 vs. 4.3%, p  < 0.001), and fetal growth restriction as evidenced by small for GA (SGA < 10th%) birth weight (44.8 vs. 42.1%, p  < 0.001) as opposed to women with stillbirth after 32 weeks. After adjustment, SGA birth weight (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1–1.3), Black race (aOR = 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1–1.3), and CHTN (aOR = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1–1.5) were associated with stillbirth prior to 32 weeks of gestation as opposed to stillbirth after 32 weeks. Conclusion  More than 6 out of 10 stillbirths in this study occurred <32 weeks of gestation, before ANFS is typically initiated under American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommendations. Among identifiable risk factors, CHTN, Black race, and fetal growth restriction were associated with higher risk of stillbirth before 32 weeks of gestation. Earlier ANFS may be warranted at in certain "at risk" women. Key Points Six out of 10 stillbirths occur before 32 weeks of gestation. We evaluated factors associated with stillbirth <32 weeks. Hypertension and fetal growth restriction were associated with early stillbirth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to ascertain if among women with fetal growth restriction (FGR; estimated fetal weight [EFW] < 10th percentile) the frequency of severe FGR (sFGR; EFW < 3rd percentile for gestational age) differed among various classes of obesity.Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort study of all pregnancies complicated by FGR from August 2016- March 2019 at a single center, undergoing weekly antenatal surveillance (biophysical profiles and umbilical artery Doppler). Exclusion criteria included multiple gestation, prenatally diagnosed fetal anomalies, and unknown maternal body mass index (BMI) at the time of the ultrasound exam. We defined fetal growth restriction as an estimated fetal weight less than the 10th percentile for gestational age using Hadlock criteria. Severe FGR was defined as the estimated fetal weight below 3rd percentile for gestational age. Maternal BMI was categorized as non-obese (BMI ≤ 29.9), Class I obesity (30.0-34.9), and Class II or III obesity (≥35.0 kg/m2). Abnormal Dopplers were defined as absent or reversed end diastolic flow. Maternal characteristics and ultrasound findings were compared between groups. Categorical variables were compared by χ2 or Fisher's exact test and continuous variables were compared by t test or nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals by adjusting for potential confounders including maternal age, hypertensive disorders, pre-gestational and gestational diabetes, auto-immune disorders, and gestational age at diagnosis.Results: Of 974 women that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 678 (70%) were not obese, 151 (15%) had class I obesity, and 145 (15%) had class II or III obesity. Obese women were significantly more likely to be multiparous and had a lower mean gestational age at diagnosis of FGR. Hypertensive disorders were more common with increasing BMI, as was type II diabetes mellitus (p < .01). There were no statistically significant differences between the obesity groups with regards to other comorbidities. Women with obesity classes I and II/III had significantly higher frequency of severe FGR (37.8%) as compared to non-obese women (29%; p < .05). The rates of abnormal Dopplers was more frequent with worsening obesity: 31.4%, 34.4%, and 46.2% for non-obese, class I obesity, and class II or III obesity, respectively (p < .01). There were no significant differences in amniotic fluid abnormalities or antenatal testing results. After adjustment for potential confounders, women with class I obesity had higher odds of having severe FGR (aOR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.0-2.1). There was also an increased odds of abnormal Dopplers among women with class II/III obesity, as compared to non-obese women, after adjusting for confounders (aOR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.2-2.6).Conclusion: Among women with FGR, obese women were more likely to have severe FGR and abnormal Dopplers compared to non-obese women. These findings warrant further study into predictors of adverse outcomes among obese women with FGR. Such information could be useful in counseling patients as to the possible course of disease after diagnosis of fetal growth restriction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Adverse pregnancy outcomes can be prevented through the early detection and treatment of anaemia, HIV and syphilis during the antenatal period. Rates of testing for anaemia, HIV and syphilis among women attending antenatal services in Indonesia are low, despite its mandate in national guidelines and international policy.Methods: Midwife-held antenatal care records for 2015 from 8 villages in 2 sub-districts within Cianjur district were reviewed, alongside the available sub-district Puskesmas (Community Health Centre) maternity and laboratory records. We conducted four focus group discussions with kaders (community health workers) (n = 16) and midwives (n = 9), and 13 semi-structured interviews with laboratory and counselling, public sector maternity and HIV management and relevant non-governmental organisation staff. Participants were recruited from village, sub-district, district and national level as relevant to role.Results: We were unable to find a single recorded result of antenatal testing for HIV, syphilis or anaemia in the village (566 women) or Puskesmas records (2816 women) for 2015. Laboratory records did not specifically identify antenatal women. Participants described conducting and reporting testing in a largely ad hoc manner; relying on referral to health facilities based on clinical suspicion or separate non-maternity voluntary counselling and testing programs. Participants recognized significant systematic challenges with key differences between the more acceptable (and reportedly more often implemented) haemoglobin testing and the less acceptable (and barely implemented) HIV and syphilis testing. However, a clear need for leadership and accountability emerged as an important factor for prioritizing antenatal testing and addressing these testing gaps.Conclusions: Practical solutions such as revised registers, availability of point-of-care tests and capacity building of field staff will therefore need to be accompanied by both funding and political will to coordinate, prioritize and be accountable for testing in pregnancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: While maternal perception of decreased fetal movements during advanced stages of pregnancy may be an indicator for adverse perinatal outcome, the long-term neurological outcome of offspring of affected pregnancies remains largely unknown.Objective: To examine whether maternal complaint of decreased fetal movements is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, and to assess the implications of decreased fetal movements on long-term neurological morbidity of the offspring.Study Design: A single center cohort analysis including deliveries between the years 1991-2014 was conducted. The association between decreased fetal movements and adverse perinatal outcome was evaluated using a general estimation equation (GEE) multivariable analyses. Incidence of hospitalizations (up to age 18 years) due to various neurological conditions was compared between offspring of affected pregnancies, and those who were not, using a Kaplan-Meyer survival curve. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to control for confounders.Results: 439 (0.18%) of 242,342 deliveries included in this study were accompanied by maternal complaint of decreased fetal movements. Perinatal outcome was comparable between the groups, with no cases of perinatal mortality observed among the exposed group. Total neurological-related hospitalization rate of the offspring, as well as hospitalizations due to movement disorders, were higher among the exposed group (Kaplan-Meyer log-rank test P < 0.05). This association between decreased fetal movements and increased long-term neurological hospitalization proved to be independent of potential confounders with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.54 (95% CI 1.0-2.37).Conclusion: Maternal complaint of decreased fetal movements does not predict adverse perinatal outcome but is associated with an elevated risk for long-term neurological morbidity of the offspring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the association between large-for-gestational-age (LGA) pregnancy and stillbirth to determine if the LGA fetus may benefit from antenatal testing with non-stress test or biophysical profile.Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies that were ongoing at 24 weeks' gestation and that had undergone routine second-trimester anatomy ultrasound examination, during the period 1990 to 2009. Pregnancies complicated by fetal anomaly or aneuploidy, those with missing birth weight information and those that were small-for-gestational age were excluded. Appropriate-for-gestational age (AGA) and LGA were defined as birth weight between the 10th and 90th percentiles and > 90th percentile, respectively, according to the Alexander growth standard. The incidence of stillbirth was calculated as the number of stillbirths per 10 000 ongoing pregnancies. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% CI for stillbirth in LGA compared with AGA pregnancies were estimated using logistic regression analysis, controlling for pre-existing and gestational diabetes. The incidence and aOR for stillbirth were estimated at 4-week intervals from ≥ 24 to ≥ 40 weeks' gestation.Results: Of 52 749 pregnancies ongoing at 24 weeks, 46 205 (87.6%) were AGA and 6544 (12.4%) were LGA at delivery. The incidence of stillbirth in LGA pregnancies was significantly higher than that in AGA pregnancies from 36 weeks' gestation (26/10 000 vs 7/10 000; aOR, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.68-5.70). When women with diabetes were excluded in stratified analysis, pregnancies complicated by LGA continued to be at increased risk for stillbirth ≥ 36 weeks (18/10 000 vs 7/10 000; OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.27-5.43).Conclusion: Pregnancies complicated by LGA are at significantly increased risk for stillbirth at or beyond 36 weeks, independent of maternal diabetes status, and may benefit from antenatal testing. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Gastroschisis is an abdominal wall defect with increasing incidence. Given the lack of surveillance guidelines among maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) specialists, this study describes current practices in gastroschisis management.Materials and Methods: An online survey was administered to MFM specialists from institutions affiliated with the North American Fetal Therapy Network (NAFTNet). Questions focused on surveillance timing, testing, findings that changed clinical management, and delivery plan.Results: Responses were obtained from 29/29 (100%) NAFTNet centers, comprising 143/371 (39%) providers. The majority had a regimen for antenatal surveillance in patients with stable gastroschisis (94%; 134/141). Antenatal testing began at 32 weeks for 68% (89/131) of MFM specialists. The nonstress test (55%; 72/129), biophysical profile (50%; 63/126), and amniotic fluid index (64%; 84/131) were used weekly. Estimated fetal weight (EFW) was performed monthly by 79% (103/131) of providers. At 28 weeks, abnormal EFW (77%; 97/126) and Doppler ultrasound (78%; 99/127) most frequently altered management. In stable gastroschisis, 43% (60/140) of providers delivered at 37 weeks, and 29% (40/ 140) at 39 weeks.Discussion: Gastroschisis management differs among NAFTNet centers, although the majority initiate surveillance at 32 weeks. Timing of delivery still requires consensus. Prospective studies are necessary to further optimize practice guidelines and patient care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: HIV, syphilis, malaria and anaemia are leading preventable causes of adverse pregnancy outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa yet testing coverage for conditions other than HIV is low. Availing point-of-care tests (POCTs) at rural antenatal health facilities (dispensaries) has the potential to improve access and timely treatment. Fundamental to the adoption of and adherence to new diagnostic approaches are healthcare workers' and pregnant women's (end-users) buy-in. A qualitative approach was used to capture end-users' experiences of using POCTs for HIV, syphilis, malaria and anaemia to assess the appropriateness, acceptability and feasibility of integrated testing for ANC.Methods: Seven dispensaries were purposively selected to implement integrated point-of-care testing for eight months in western Kenya. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 healthcare workers (14 nurses, one clinical officer, two HIV testing counsellors, and one laboratory technician) who were trained, had experience doing integrated point-of-care testing, and were still working at the facilities 8-12 months after the intervention began. The interviews explored acceptability and relevance of POCTs to ANC, challenges with testing, training and supervision, and healthcare workers' perspectives of client experiences. Twelve focus group discussions with 118 pregnant women who had attended a first ANC visit at the study facilities during the intervention were conducted to explore their knowledge of HIV, syphilis, malaria, and anaemia, experience of ANC point-of-care testing services, treatments received, relationships with healthcare workers, and experience of talking to partners about HIV and syphilis results.Results: Healthcare workers reported that they enjoyed gaining new skills, were enthusiastic about using POCTs, and found them easy to use and appropriate to their practice. Initial concerns that performing additional testing would increase their workload in an already strained environment were resolved with experience and proficiency with the testing procedures. However, despite having the diagnostic tools, general health system challenges such as high client to healthcare worker volume ratio, stock-outs and poor working conditions challenged the delivery of adequate counselling and management of the four conditions. Pregnant women appreciated POCTs, but reported poor healthcare worker attitudes, drug stock-outs, and fear of HIV disclosure to their partners as shortcomings to their ANC experience in general.Conclusion: This study provides insights on the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of integrating POCTs into ANC services among end-users. While the innovation was desired and perceived as beneficial, future scale-up efforts would need to address health system weaknesses if integrated testing and subsequent effective management of the four conditions are to be achieved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the attitude (view, likely uptake and preferred strategy) towards cell-free fetal DNA (cfDNA) testing among pregnant women before a first-trimester risk assessment for trisomy 21 (unselected women) and after obtaining a high risk.Material and Methods: Unselected and high-risk women attending first-trimester screening (Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital) were invited to fill out the questionnaire Antenatal testing for Down syndrome as an online survey.Results: The survey included 203 unselected and 50 high-risk women (response rates of 74.8% and 84.7%, respectively). Nearly all considered cfDNA testing a positive development in antenatal care, and 97.2% would like it to be offered. Offering cfDNA testing as an alternative to invasive testing would increase the uptake of follow-up testing compared with invasive testing alone (98.8% vs. 90.7%, p < 0.001). Women who would only accept follow up by cfDNA testing were more likely to continue an affected pregnancy (30.0% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.001) or have doubts about termination (50.0% vs. 32.1%, p < 0.001).Conclusions: Offering cfDNA testing would likely increase the uptake of follow-up testing without a corresponding rise in the termination rate of affected fetuses as some women test for information only. However, both unselected and high-risk women had overwhelmingly positive views underlining attention to avoid routinization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective The objective of this study was to describe antenatal/intrapartum management and survival of liveborn infants with known trisomy 13 (T13) or trisomy 18 (T18) based on planned neonatal care. Study Design This is a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies complicated by T13/T18 at a tertiary center from 2004 to 2015. We included pregnancies with antenatal or neonatal cytogenetic T13/T18 diagnosis and excluded those which were terminated or had a fetal demise < 20 weeks. We compared antenatal/intrapartum management and neonatal survival by planned neonatal care, defined as either neonatal intervention (INT), including neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitative measures or comfort care (CC) without resuscitative measures. Results In this study, 32 women (10 with T13 and 22 with T18) met study criteria; 12 (38%) elected INT and 20 (62%) CC. Compared with those who elected INT, women who elected CC weremore likely to undergo elective induction (40 vs. 0%, p = 0.01), have an intrapartum stillbirth (0 vs. 32%, p = 0.14), and deliver vaginally (25 vs. 63%, p < 0.01). In neonatal survival analysis (n = 26), median survival was longer in the INT group compared with CC group (64 days [interquartile range, IQR: 2, 155) vs. 3 days [IQR]: 0.3, 42), p = 0.28), but survival to hospital discharge was similar (53 vs. 57%, p = 0.95). Conclusion Regardless of desired level of neonatal INT, many women who continue pregnancies complicated by T13/18 have infants who survive beyond hospital discharge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Despite limited data, antenatal testing has been initiated in many institutions for women with morbid obesity given their increased risk of stillbirth. Therefore, our objective was to evaluate the obstetrical implications of antenatal testing in the morbidly obese population. Study Design We performed a retrospective cohort study of women undergoing antenatal testing from January 2011 through December 2012 who delivered at our institution. The exposed group was women undergoing antenatal testing with morbid obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 40 kg/m²). This group was subdivided into two groups: group 1, which included women undergoing testing for morbid obesity alone, and group 2, which included women undergoing testing for morbid obesity with an additional medical comorbidity. The unexposed group (group 3) comprised nonmorbidly obese women (BMI < 35 kg/m²) undergoing antenatal testing for similar medical comorbidities. Our primary outcomes were induction of labor and gestational age at delivery. Results A total of 512 women met inclusion criteria. Group 1 had a lower induction rate as compared with groups 2 and 3 (22.2, 32.5, and 37.6%, respectively; p = 0.003). Additionally, women delivered at a later gestational age in group 1 (39.3 weeks [38.4-40.2]) compared with groups 2 (38.5 weeks [36.1-40.3]) or 3 (37.1 weeks [37.0-38.2]), p = 0.04. There were no significant differences in our secondary outcomes including rate of cesarean delivery (p = 0.11) or rate of nonreactive nonstress test (p = 0.4). Conclusions While it remains unknown whether antenatal testing decreases the stillbirth risk in morbidly obese women, this population does not appear to be at increased risk of induction of labor or delivery prior to 39 weeks secondary to testing. Future studies should evaluate neonatal implications and cost-effectiveness of antenatal testing in this group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pakistan is the sixth most populous country in the World. High rates of consanguinity and inter caste marriages have resulted in a substantial burden of inherited metabolic disorders (IMDs). Despite this load, there is a dearth of both medical genetic and clinical metabolic services in Pakistan. There are inadequate numbers of appropriately trained clinicians, ill-equipped laboratories, lack of scientists and technologists equipped with skills to deal with the challenging laboratory investigations involved in IMD and a health care infra-structure unable to support a service. Aim: We present the first five year experience of the first established metabolic unit at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan and present the case for screening of parents, parents' siblings and antenatal diagnostic testing in subsequent pregnancies in order that families can make informed choices in preventing recurrence. Subjects and methods: This retrospective observational study comprising of patients' chart review was conducted in the Department of Paediatrics, AKUH Karachi in Pakistan for patients who presented to the Clinical Genetics unit from January 2008 to December 2012 seeking diagnosis and treatment for the underlying IMD. Results: We evaluated 426 children, of which, 333 (78%) had consanguineous parents. Most patients, 151 (35%). evaluated for IMD were between 1 year and 5 years of age. Developmental delay, seizures, hypotonia, microcephaly, neuroregression, dystonia, ataxia and encephalopathy were the most common reasons for referrals. Only 155 (36%) patients underwent metabolic biochemical testing. Among the investigated group of patients, diagnoses were established for 85 (55%) patients equivalent to only 19.8% of the total. Conclusion: Neonatal screening for IMDs and their treatment in the current situation is an unaffordable practical option in Pakistan. Screening parents, siblings and subsequent pregnancies, however, is likely to provide a cost effective and acceptable alternative in reducing the burden and enabling early, effective detection of affected progeny before the stage when neurometabolic changes become irreversible in developing countries like Pakistan with very limited resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Antenatal testing has been implemented for advanced maternal age (AMA) women given their increased stillbirth risk. Our objective was to evaluate cesarean delivery and induction rates after the start of antenatal testing at our institution. Study Design A retrospective cohort study of AMA women (≥ 40 years) who delivered at our institution was performed. Testing for AMA began in 2005. AMA women who delivered before (unexposed) and after (exposed) the implementation were compared. Our primary outcome was cesarean delivery and secondary outcome was induction. Chi-square compared categorical variables and multivariable logistic regression calculated odds ratio (OR) and controlled for confounders. Results A total of 276 women were included (147 unexposed and 129 exposed). The cesarean rate was higher in the exposed group (53 vs. 39%, OR 1.76 [1.09-2.84]). The increased risk of cesarean remained after adjusting for race, previous cesarean, multiple gestations, and parity (adjusted OR 1.85 [1.05-3.28]). When excluding those with previous cesareans, the risk of primary cesarean was not significant (OR 1.57 [0.89-2.76]). The induction rate was not different (38 vs. 33%, p = 0.4). Conclusions While overall cesareans increased, there was no difference in primary cesarean and induction rates for AMA women after implementation of antenatal testing for AMA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the effect of use and abuse of substances on antenatal and intrapartum fetal testing and well-being in pregnant patients. The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) has provided guidance on the interpretation of antepartum and intrapartum fetal heart rate (FHR).

Objective: Our primary objective was to determine whether vibroacoustic stimulation (VAS) decreases time to fetal reactivity in the antenatal testing unit (ATU) of a tertiary care center. Methods: We performed a prospective, quality assurance initiative to determine whether VAS could increase the efficiency of our ATU. On pre-specified 'VAS days,' VAS was applied for 3 s, if the non-stress test was non-reactive in the first 10 min. Generalized estimating equations models were used to account for within subject correlation due to multiple appointments per patient. Results: VAS use was associated with a 3.76-min reduction in time to reactivity (21.79 vs 25.55, p = 0.011) and a 56% reduction in the need for a biophysical profile (OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.21-0.90). Overall, however, we found no significant decrease in time spent on the monitor or in the ATU. Conclusion: Compliance with a strict VAS protocol may improve the efficiency of increasingly busy ATUs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim was to assess whether women suffering from migraine are at higher risk of developing hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. In a prospective cohort study, performed at antenatal clinics in three maternity units in Northern Italy, 702 normotensive women with singleton pregnancy at 11–16 weeks' gestation were enrolled. Women with a history of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy or presenting chronic hypertension were excluded. The presence of migraine was investigated according to International Headache Society criteria. The main outcome measure was the onset of hypertension in pregnancy, defined as the occurrence of either gestational hypertension or preeclampsia. Two hundred and seventy women (38.5%) were diagnosed with migraine. The majority (68.1%) suffered from migraine without aura. The risk of developing hypertensive disorders in pregnancy was higher in migraineurs (9.1%) compared with non-migraineurs (3.1%) [odds ratio (OR) adjusted for age, family history of hypertension and smoking 2.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.40, 5.81]. Women with migraine also showed a trend to increased risk for low birth weight infants with respect to women without migraine (OR 1.97, 95% CI 0.98, 3.98). Women with migraine are to be considered at increased risk of developing hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. The diagnosis of primary headaches should be taken into account at antenatal examination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective:We sought to compare two approaches to antenatal testing for their impact on the workforce.Study Design:This is a prospective observational study of women who presented for antenatal testing. All women were given a survey upon presentation. As per hospital protocol, nonstress testing (NST) was performed semiweekly and biophysical profile (BPP) was performed weekly. The choice of testing was determined by the attending physician. χ2- and Student's t-tests were performed where appropriate. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant.Result:A total of 195 women were surveyed. Among them, 94 women had an NST and 101 had a BPP. Overall, 59.2% were multiparous, 33.1% had to arrange for child care and 97.2% felt reassured by the testing. There were no differences in demographic characteristics, education, type of insurance or employment status between the groups. Women who had NSTs were more likely to lose time from work than those who had BPPs (218.4 versus 68.9 min; P<0.001). Of the women who had semiweekly NSTs, 80.6% would have preferred weekly testing. If the 94 women who received semiweekly testing had weekly testing, a total of 534.4 h would have been available for the workforce.Conclusion:Twice-weekly NST results in a significant increase in time lost from the workforce compared with weekly BPP.Journal of Perinatology (2008) 28, 102–106; doi:10.1038/sj.jp.7211877; published online 29 November 2007 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To assess the impact of and adherence to the British HIV Association (BHIVA) guidelines in routine clinical practice in the UK and Ireland.A self-completed postal survey of practice with regard to HIV management and maternity care of HIV-positive women was carried out. A case-note review of all patients starting their first antiretroviral (ART) therapy (up to a maximum of 25 patients) between April and September 2002 was also performed.A total of 113 treatment centres participated. Ninety-nine units (88%) use the BHIVA ART guidelines as part of their treatment policy. Problems revealed by the survey include limited access to some ARTs in a small number of units and a wait longer than 4 weeks before the first assessment of patients started on ART in some units. Thirty-one centres (33%) felt that their maternity services had reached the government target of>90% antenatal HIV testing by October 2002. A total of 942 case-notes audited showed shortfalls in reported pretreatment testing of blood glucose, lipids and hepatitis C virus. Three patients had not strictly met the BHIVA guidelines for starting ART, but all had a high viral load (>100 000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL). The majority (844 patients; 90%) had started on recommended therapies, most commonly two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. The other 98 patients (10%) were given a variety of nonstandard triple or quadruple ART.This audit again shows a high rate of consistency and quality of care of patients with HIV across the UK and Ireland. Problems with pretreatment assessment and early follow up of patients starting ART have been found. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]