Search

Background: The out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in the young may be associated with a genetic predisposition which is relevant even for genetic counseling of relatives. The identification of genetic variants depends on the availability of intact genomic DNA. DNA from autopsy may be not available due to low autopsy frequencies or not suitable for high-throughput DNA sequencing (NGS). The emergency medical service (EMS) plays an important role to save biomaterial for subsequent molecular autopsy. It is not known whether the DNA integrity of samples collected by the EMS is better suited for NGS than autopsy specimens. Material and methods: DNA integrity was analyzed by standardized protocols. Fourteen blood samples collected by the EMS and biomaterials from autopsy were compared. We collected 172 autopsy samples from different tissues and blood with postmortem intervals of 14–168 h. For comparison, DNA integrity derived from blood stored under experimental conditions was checked against autopsy blood after different time intervals. Results: DNA integrity and extraction yield were higher in EMS blood compared to any autopsy tissue. DNA stability in autopsy specimens was highly variable and had unpredictable quality. In contrast, collecting blood samples by the EMS is feasible and delivered comparably the highest DNA integrity. Conclusions: Isolation yield and DNA integrity from blood samples collected by the EMS is superior in comparison to autopsy specimens. DNA from blood samples collected by the EMS on scene is stable at room temperature or even for days at 4 °C. We conclude that the EMS personnel should always save a blood sample of young fatal OHCA cases died on scene to enable subsequent genetic analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Genetics of sudden cardiac deaths (SCD) remains frequently undetected. Genetic analysis is recommended in undefined selected cases in the 2021 ERC-guideline. The emergency medical service and physicians (EMS) may play a pivotal role for unraveling SCD by saving biomaterial for later molecular autopsy. Since for high-throughput DNA-sequencing (NGS) high quality genomic DNA is needed. We investigated in a prospective proof-of-concept study the role of the EMS for the identification of genetic forms of SCDs in the young.Methods: We included patients aged 1-50 years with need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation attempts (CPR). Cases with non-natural deaths were excluded. In two German counties with 562,904 residents 39,506 services were analysed. Paired end panel-sequencing was performed, and variants were classified according to guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG).Results: 769 CPR-attempts were recorded (1.95% of all EMS-services; CPR-incidence 68/100,000). In 103 cases CPR were performed in patients < 50y. 58% died on scene, 26% were discharged from hospital. 24 subjects were included for genotyping. Of these 33% died on scene, 37.5% were discharged from hospital. 25% of the genotyped patients were carriers of (likely) pathogenic (ACMG-4/-5) variants. 67% carried variants with unknown significance (ACMG-3). 2 of them had familial history for arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy or had to be re-classified as ACMG-4 carriers due to whole exome sequencing.Conclusion: The EMS contributes especially in fatal OHCA-cases to increase the yield of identified genetic conditions by collecting a blood sample on scene. Thus, the EMS can contribute significantly to primary and secondary prophylaxis in affected families. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic cardiomyopathy with a prevalence of about 1:200. It is characterized by left ventricular hypertrophy, diastolic dysfunction and interstitial fibrosis; HCM might lead to sudden cardiac death (SCD) especially in the young. Due to low autopsy frequencies of sudden unexplained deaths (SUD) the true prevalence of SCD and especially of HCM among SUD remains unclear. Even in cases of proven SCD genetic testing is not a routine procedure precluding appropriate risk stratification and counseling of relatives. Methods: Here we report a case of SCD in a 19‐year‐old investigated by combined forensic and molecular autopsy. Results: During autopsy of the index‐patient HCM was detected. As no other possible cause of death could be uncovered by forensic autopsy the event was classified as SCD. Molecular autopsy identified two (probably) pathogenic genetic variants in FHL1 and MYBPC3. The MYBPC3 variant had an incomplete penetrance. The FHL1 variant was a de novo mutation. We detected reduced FHL1 mRNA levels and no FHL1 protein in muscle samples suggesting nonsense‐mediated mRNA decay and/or degradation of the truncated protein in the SCD victim revealing a plausible disease mechanism. Conclusion: The identification of the genetic cause of the SCD contributed to the rational counseling of the relatives and risk assessment within the family. Furthermore our study revealed evidences for the pathomechanism of FHL1 mutations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]