Search

Background: Treatment of individuals with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis is still handled controversially. Recommendations for treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are based on trials having recruited patients more than 15 years ago. Registry data indicate that advances in best medical treatment (BMT) may lead to a markedly decreasing risk of stroke in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The aim of the SPACE-2 trial (ISRCTN78592017) was to compare the stroke preventive effects of BMT alone with that of BMT in combination with CEA or carotid artery stenting (CAS), respectively, in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis of ≥70% European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) criteria. Methods: SPACE-2 is a randomized, controlled, multicenter, open study. A major secondary endpoint was the cumulative rate of any stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) or death from any cause within 30 days plus an ipsilateral ischemic stroke within one year of follow-up. Safety was assessed as the rate of any stroke and death from any cause within 30 days after CEA or CAS. Protocol changes had to be implemented. The results on the one-year period after treatment are reported. Findings: It was planned to enroll 3550 patients. Due to low recruitment, the enrollment of patients was stopped prematurely after randomization of 513 patients in 36 centers to CEA (n = 203), CAS (n = 197), or BMT (n = 113). The one-year rate of the major secondary endpoint did not significantly differ between groups (CEA 2.5%, CAS 3.0%, BMT 0.9%; p = 0.530) as well as rates of any stroke (CEA 3.9%, CAS 4.1%, BMT 0.9%; p = 0.256) and all-cause mortality (CEA 2.5%, CAS 1.0%, BMT 3.5%; p = 0.304). About half of all strokes occurred in the peri-interventional period. Higher albeit statistically non-significant rates of restenosis occurred in the stenting group (CEA 2.0% vs. CAS 5.6%; p = 0.068) without evidence of increased stroke rates. Interpretation: The low sample size of this prematurely stopped trial of 513 patients implies that its power is not sufficient to show that CEA or CAS is superior to a modern medical therapy (BMT) in the primary prevention of ischemic stroke in patients with an asymptomatic carotid stenosis up to one year after treatment. Also, no evidence for differences in safety between CAS and CEA during the first year after treatment could be derived. Follow-up will be performed up to five years. Data may be used for pooled analysis with ongoing trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Post-stroke care programs based on a standardized treatment pathway supported by case management may prevent secondary stroke and minimize risk factors. Objectives: We aimed to determine the feasibility of a standardized treatment pathway and its impact on risk factor control, life-style changes and adherence to secondary prevention medication. Methods: We conducted a prospective pilot study in consecutive stroke patients. The 12-month post-stroke care program included regular perosnal and phone contact with a certified case manager. Target values for vascular risk factors following current recommendations of stroke guidelines were monitored and treated if necessary. In the case of deviations from the treatment pathway the case manager intervened. Patients were screened for recurrent stroke at the end of the program after 12 months. Results: We enrolled 101 patients: 57.4 % were male, the median age was 72 (IQR, 62-80) years, median baseline NIHSS score was 2(IQR, 1-5), 79.2 % had an ischemic stroke, 3 % a hemorrhagic stroke, and 17.8 % a transient ischemic attack (TIA). Eighty-six (85.1 %) patients completed the program, 12 (11.9 %) withdrew from the program and 3 died of malignant diseases. In total, 628 personal (6.2/patient) and 2,683 phone contacts (26.6/patient) were conducted by the case manager. Three hundred-seventy-nine specific interventions were necessary mostly because of missing medication, non-compliance, and social needs. After 12 months, target goals for blood pressure, body mass index, nicotine use, and cholesterol were more frequently ( p < 0.05) achieved than at baseline. No recurrent stroke occurred during the program. Conclusions: Our pilot data demonstrate that case management-based post-stroke care is feasible and may contribute to effective secondary prevention of stroke. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]