Search

Background The OPUS study demonstrated that addition of cetuximab to 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) significantly improved objective response and progression-free survival (PFS) in the first-line treatment of patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In patients with KRAS exon 2 mutations, a detrimental effect was seen upon addition of cetuximab to FOLFOX4. The current study reports outcomes in subgroups defined by extended RAS testing. Patients and methods Samples from OPUS study KRAS exon 2 wild-type tumours were reanalysed for other RAS mutations in four additional KRAS codons (exons 3–4) and six NRAS codons (exons 2–4) using BEAMing. A cutoff of ⩾5% mutant/wild-type sequences was selected to define RAS status; we also report an analysis using a cutoff based on the technical lower limit for mutation identification (0.1%). Results Other RAS mutations were detected in 31/118 (26%) evaluable patients. In the extended analysis of RAS wild-type tumours ( n = 87), objective response was significantly improved by addition of cetuximab to FOLFOX4 (58% versus 29%; odds ratio 3.33 [95% confidence interval 1.36–8.17]; P = 0.0084); although limited by population size, there also appeared to be trends favouring the cetuximab arm in terms of PFS and overall survival in the RAS wild-type group compared with the RAS evaluable group. There was no evidence that patients with other RAS mutations benefited from cetuximab, but small numbers precluded precise estimations of treatment effects. In the combined population of patients with any RAS mutation ( KRAS exon 2 or other RAS ), a clear detrimental effect was associated with addition of cetuximab to FOLFOX4. Conclusion Patients with RAS -mutant mCRC, as defined by mutations in KRAS and NRAS exons 2–4, derive no benefit and may be harmed by the addition of cetuximab to FOLFOX4. Restricting cetuximab administration to patients with RAS wild-type tumours will further tailor therapy to maximise benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The randomized phase II OPUS (Oxaliplatin and Cetuximab in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer) study showed that tumor KRAS mutation status was predictive for outcome in patients receiving cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 (oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil/folinic acid) as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).Patients and methods: The biomarker analysis was extended through the use of additional DNA samples extracted from stained tissue sections. KRAS and BRAF tumor mutation status was determined for new (and for BRAF, existing) samples using a PCR technique. Clinical outcome was reassessed according to mutation status. Overall survival data are presented.Results: Of 315 KRAS evaluable patient samples (93%), 179 tumors (57%) were KRAS wild type. Eleven of 309 (4%) KRAS/BRAF evaluable tumors (all KRAS wild type) carried BRAF mutations. The addition of cetuximab to FOLFOX-4 significantly improved progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.567, P = 0.0064) and response (odds ratio 2.551, P = 0.0027) in patients with KRAS wild-type tumors. A favorable effect on survival was also observed.Conclusions: These results confirm the efficacy of cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 in the first-line treatment of patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC and confirm KRAS mutation status as an effective predictive biomarker. The small number of tumors with BRAF mutations precluded the drawing of definitive conclusions concerning the predictive or prognostic utility of this biomarker. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Anaemia is frequently diagnosed in patients with cancer, and may have a detrimental effect on quality of life (QoL). We previously conducted a systematic literature review (1996–2003) to produce evidence-based guidelines on the use of erythropoietic proteins in anaemic patients with cancer.[Bokemeyer C, Aapro MS, Courdi A, et al. EORTC guidelines for the use of erythropoietic proteins in anaemic patients with cancer. Eur J Cancer 2004;40:2201–2216.] We report here an update to these guidelines, including literature published through to November 2005. The results of this updated systematic literature review have enabled us to refine our guidelines based on the full body of data currently available. Level I evidence exists for a positive impact of erythropoietic proteins on haemoglobin (Hb) levels when administered to patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or anaemia of chronic disease, when used to prevent cancer anaemia, and in patients undergoing cancer surgery. The addition of further Level I studies confirms our recommendation that in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, treatment with erythropoietic proteins should be initiated at a Hb level of 9–11g/dL based on anaemia-related symptoms rather than a fixed Hb concentration. Early intervention with erythropoietic proteins may be considered in asymptomatic anaemic patients with Hb levels ⩽11.9g/dL provided that individual factors like intensity and expected duration of chemotherapy are considered. Patients whose Hb level is below 9g/dL should primarily be evaluated for need of transfusions potentially followed by the application of erythropoietic proteins. We do not recommend the prophylactic use of erythropoietic proteins to prevent anaemia in patients undergoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy who have normal Hb levels at the start of treatment, as the literature has not shown a benefit with this approach. The addition of further supporting studies confirms our recommendation that the target Hb concentration following treatment with erythropoietic proteins should be 12–13g/dL. Once this level is achieved, maintenance doses should be titrated individually. There is Level I evidence that dosing of erythropoietic proteins less frequently than three times per week is efficacious when used to treat chemotherapy-induced anaemia or prevent cancer anaemia, with studies supporting the use of epoetin alfa and epoetin beta weekly and darbepoetin alfa given every week or every 3 weeks. We do not recommend the use of higher than standard initial doses of erythropoietic proteins with the aim of producing higher haematological responses, due to the limited body of evidence available. There is Level I evidence that, within reasonable limits of body weight, fixed doses of erythropoietic proteins can be used to treat patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia. This analysis confirms that there are no baseline predictive factors of response to erythropoietic proteins that can be routinely used in clinical practice if functional iron deficiency or vitamin deficiency is ruled out; a low serum erythropoietin (EPO) level (only in haematological malignancies) appears to be the only predictive factor to be verified in Level I studies. Further studies are needed to investigate the value of hepcidin, c-reactive protein, and other measures as predictive factors. In these updated guidelines, we explored a new question of whether oral or intravenous iron supplementation increases the response rate to erythropoietic proteins. We found no evidence of increased response with the addition of oral iron supplementation, but there is Level II evidence of improved response to erythropoietic proteins with the addition of intravenous iron. However, the doses and schedules for intravenous iron supplementation are not yet well defined, and further studies in this area are warranted. The two major goals of erythropoietic protein therapy are prevention or elimination of transfusions and improvement of QoL. The total body of evidence shows that red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements are reduced following treatment with erythropoietic proteins. This analysis also confirms that QoL is significantly improved in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia and in those with anaemia of chronic disease following erythropoietic protein therapy, with more robust evidence now available that QoL was improved in studies investigating early intervention in cases of chemotherapy- or radiotherapy-induced anaemia. There is only indirect evidence that patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or anaemia of chronic disease initially classified as non-responders to standard doses proceed to respond to treatment following a dose increase. None of the studies addressed the question in a prospective, randomised fashion, and so the Taskforce does not recommend dose escalation as a general approach in all patients who are not responding. There is still insufficient data to determine the effect on survival following treatment with erythropoietic proteins in conjunction with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Our analysis of survival endpoints in studies involving patients receiving radio(chemo)therapy found that most studies were inconclusive, with no clear link between the use of erythropoietic proteins and survival. Likewise, we found no clear link between erythropoietic therapy and other endpoints such as local tumour control, time to progression, and progression-free survival. There is no evidence that pure red cell aplasia occurs in cancer patients following treatment with erythropoietic proteins, and the fear of this condition developing should not lead to erythropoietic proteins being withheld in patients with cancer. There is Level I evidence that the risk of thromboembolic events and hypertension are slightly elevated in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia receiving erythropoietic proteins. Additional trials are warranted, especially to define the optimal doses and schedules of intravenous iron supplementation during erythropoietic therapy. While our review did not address cost benefit evaluations in detail, the consensus is that studies taking into account all real determinants of cost and benefit need to be performed prospectively. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

This review focuses on the pathophysiology, incidence and treatment of anaemia in cancer patients. Causative factors such as different chemotherapy regimens and patient risk factors for the development of anaemia are discussed in order to identify the patient group that is most likely to receive red blood cell transfusions and would thus have the largest benefit from treatment with erythropoietic proteins. The data available with recombinant human erythropoietin alfa, recombinant human erythropoietin beta and darbepoetin alfa are described in more detail and the significant benefit of treating cancer anaemia by these molecules is outlined. Finally, differences in treatment approaches between these erythropoietic proteins are discussed in order to guide treatment decisions specific for the individual patients’ situation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Anaemia is frequently diagnosed in patients with cancer, yet it is difficult to identify a single cause due to its multifactorial aetiology. We conducted a systematic literature review (19962003) to produce evidence-based guidelines on the use of erythropoietic proteins in anaemic patients with cancer (see Table 4). Level I evidence exists for a positive impact of erythropoietic proteins on haemoglobin (Hb) levels when administered to patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or anaemia of chronic disease, when used to prevent cancer anaemia, in patients undergoing cancer surgery and following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. The Hb level at which erythropoietic protein therapy should be initiated is difficult to determine as it varied between studies; a large number of Level I studies in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or anaemia of chronic disease enrolled patients with a Hb concentration ?105 g/L, but none compared the effect of different baseline Hb levels on the response to treatment. Similarly, several studies defined the target Hb concentration as 120130 g/L following treatment with erythropoietic proteins, but none specifically addressed the correlation between target Hb level and clinical benefit in a randomised fashion. Level I evidence shows that red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements are significantly reduced with erythropoietic protein therapy in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or when used to prevent cancer anaemia (approximately 20% reduction compared with controls). We found indirect Level I and III evidence that patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or anaemia of chronic disease initially classified as non-responders to standard doses proceed to respond to treatment following a dose increase (absolute increases in response rate ranged from 8% to 18%). However, none of these studies examined the effect on response rates of a longer treatment period at the lower dose, or performed a randomised comparison of a dose increase versus an unchanged dose. There is Level I evidence to show that quality-of-life (QOL) is significantly improved in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia and in those with anaemia of chronic disease, particularly in patients achieving a Hb response to erythropoietic protein therapy. There are insufficient data to determine the effect on survival following treatment with erythropoietic proteins in conjunction with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. There is Level I evidence that dosing of erythropoietic proteins less frequently than three times per week (TIW) is efficacious when used to treat chemotherapy-induced anaemia or prevent cancer anaemia. There is Level III evidence that initial doses of erythropoietic proteins considered to be higher than current standard practice produce higher haematological responses in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or anaemia of chronic disease. Level I evidence demonstrates that several baseline patient parameters (e.g., low endogenous erythropoietin [EPO] concentration, age <60 years, Hb concentration ?90 g/L) impact upon the response to erythropoietic proteins when used to treat chemotherapy-induced anaemia or prevent cancer anaemia. Evidence indicates that endogenous EPO concentration impacts on response in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies, but is not a valid parameter in patients with solid tumours. There is Level I evidence that fixed doses of erythropoietic proteins can be used at the start of therapy to treat patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia, but maintenance doses should be titrated individually. There is no evidence that pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) occurs following treatment with erythropoietic proteins in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or when used prophylactically in patients with cancer. There is Level I evidence that the risk of thromboembolic events and hypertension are slightly elevated in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia receiving erythropoietic proteins. Level I evidence supports the effectiveness of erythropoietic proteins to prevent anaemia in non-anaemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or in those undergoing cancer surgery. However, these are non-licensed indications and we do not currently recommend the prophylactic use of erythropoietic proteins to prevent anaemia in patients who have normal Hb values at the start of treatment. Additional trials are warranted, especially on the issues of iron replacement and cost-effectiveness of erythropoietic protein therapy, as well as on tumour response/progression and survival. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

To study the role of single agent carboplatin chemotherapy in patients with metastatic seminoma based on the data from two randomised trials. In subgroup analyses in patients with different disease characteristics, the outcome treated with either single agent carboplatin or cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy was compared. Individual patient data from two randomised European trials involving patients with metastatic seminoma were gathered. The primary endpoint for all analyses was progression-free survival. The source data of 361 patients, 184 treated with cisplatin-based combinations and 177 treated with carboplatin single agent therapy, were entered into the analysis. Patient characteristics were comparable among the cisplatin-based and the carboplatin single agent treated patient groups with lymph nodes and lungs being the most frequent metastatic sites in 92 and 8% of patients, respectively. Overall, patients treated with single agent carboplatin had an inferior 5-year overall (89 and 94%; P=0.09) and progression-free survival rate (72 and 92%; P< 0.0001) compared with patients receiving cisplatin-based combinations. For all investigated subgroups (based on age, prior radiation therapy, metastatic sites), carboplatin single agent therapy was found to be inferior to cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. In conclusion, carboplatin single agent therapy cannot be recommended as standard treatment for any patient subgroup with advanced metastatic seminoma and cisplatin-based combination regimens remain the standard of care.British Journal of Cancer (2004) 91, 683-687. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602020 www.bjcancer.com Published online 13 July 2004 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The introduction of cisplatin-based systemic chemotherapy into the clinical routine has resulted in a substantial improvement of the recurrence-free and long-term survival of patients with metastatic testicular germ cell tumors. Late relapses after the completion of first-line therapy, comprising systemic chemotherapeutic treatment in combination with a complete resection of residual tumor masses visible in about 25–50% of patients, have been reported to occur in 1–5% of patients later than 2 years following the initial treatment. It has been reported that the risk for the development of late recurrence is correlated to the tumor burden at first diagnosis and/or the presence of teratomatous components within the primary testicular cancer. Second-line chemotherapy in combination with surgery, although not very well standardized, has been recommended as the most effective therapeutic regimen during the treatment of patients suffering from late recurrent germ cell tumors. Herein, we report our single-center experience with 14 patients in different clinical stages who developed late relapse after successful first-line therapy. In the present series, the risk for late relapse was not correlated to the clinical stage at first diagnosis or the presence of teratomatous elements within the primary tumor. It became evident that in selected cases chemotherapy alone can be considered a curative treatment option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To determine the efficacy of first-line sequential high-dose VIP chemotherapy (HD-VIP) in patients with primary mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell tumours (GCT), 28 patients were enrolled on a German multicentre trial. High-Dose VIP chemotherapy consisted of 3-4 cycles of dose-intensive etoposide and ifosfamide plus cisplatin, q22days, each cycle followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. One cycle of standard-dose VIP was applied to harvest peripheral blood stem cells. Ten patients had mediastinal involvement as the only manifestation (36 %), 18 of 28 patients had additional metastatic sites, such as lung (n=17; 61%), liver (n=7; 25%), bone (n=5; 18%), lymph nodes (n=3; 11%) and CNS (n=3; 11%). Median follow-up was 43 months (range, 7-113) for all patients and 52 months (range, 22-113) for surviving patients. Nineteen of 28 patients obtained a disease-free status; 11 with HD-VIP alone and eight with adjunctive surgery. In addition, one of the four patients with marker negative partial remission after HD-VIP without resection of residual masses is currently alive. Two patients developed recurrence of GCT or teratoma. Two patients have died due to an associated haematologic disorder. The 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates are 64 and 68%, respectively. This report represents a subgroup analysis of 28 patients with mediastinal nonsemina within the German first-line study for 'poor prognosis' GCT. Compared to data of an international database analysis including 253 patients with mediastinal nonseminoma treated with conventional chemotherapy, the results may indicate that HD-VIP results in an approximately 15% survival improvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

First-line sequential high dose chemotherapy is under investigation in patients with "poor prognosis" metastatic germ cell tumours in order to improve survival. Despite the use of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation and granulocyte colony stimulating factor chemotherapy dose intensification is associated with severe haematotoxicity including anaemia, which may significantly affect quality of life and tolerability of chemotherapy. This study investigates the frequency and degree of anaemia in patients receiving first-line sequential high dose chemotherapy for metastatic testicular cancer and the impact of anaemia on treatment outcome. A total of 101 newly diagnosed patients with "poor prognosis" metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumours were treated with one cycle of standard VIP followed by three cycles of HD-VIP-chemotherapy (etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin) within a large phase I/II study. Differential blood cell counts were taken prior, during and after every cycle of chemotherapy. Additionally, the numbers of red blood cell and platelet transfusions were recorded. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to correlate pre-treatment and post-treatment haemoglobin values to response and overall survival. Forty-eight per cent of the patients were classified anaemic (haemoglobin <12 g dl(-1)) prior to the start of chemotherapy. The application of sequential HD-VIP resulted in median haemoglobin nadirs between 7.8 g dl(-1) (range 5.5-11.1 g dl(-1)) in the first cycle and 7.6 g dl(-1) (range 6.0-11.4 g dl(-1)) in the third cycle despite the frequent use of red blood cell transfusions. Almost all patients (99%) had haemoglobin levels <10 g dl(-1) at some timepoint during first-line sequential high dose chemotherapy. Overall, 97 patients received red blood cell transfusions with a median of 10 units (range 2-25) per patient during the four consecutive cycles of therapy. The time to first transfusion was shortest in patients with the lowest initial haemoglobin values. While there was no prediction of response or outcome by baseline haemoglobin-levels, a significant survival difference in favour of patients with a haemoglobin value >10.5 g dl(-1) after completion of four cycles of therapy (at leukocyte recovery after the last cycle) compared to those with haemoglobin values <10.5 g dl(-1) was found with 3-year overall survival rates of 87% vs 68%, respectively (P<0.05). Severe anaemia is a very frequent side effect of sequential dose intensive therapy in patients with germ cell cancer, with almost all patients becoming transfusion dependent. Despite the frequent use of red blood cell transfusions, median haemoglobin nadirs remained about 7.5-8 g dl(-1) during therapy. A correlation of haemoglobin-values after completion of therapy to overall treatment outcome was found. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To assess the ability of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for the early prediction of response in patients with relapsed metastatic germ cell tumours undergoing salvage high-dose chemotherapy. The role of positron emission tomography was compared with established means of tumour response assessment such as CT scans/MRI and serum tumour marker changes. In addition, positron emission tomography was compared with a current prognostic score which differentiates three prognostic groups with failure-free survival rates ranging from 5-50%. [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake of metastases from germ cell tumours as well as CT scans and serum tumour marker were acquired after 2-3 cycles of induction chemotherapy but before the start of high-dose chemotherapy and CT scans/serum tumour marker were compared with the baseline examinations in 23 patients with relapsed germ cell tumours. To evaluate the validity of early response prediction by positron emission tomography, radiological monitoring and serum tumour marker decline, histopathologic response after resection of residual masses and/or the clinical course over 6 months after the end of treatment (relapse vs freedom of progression) were used. Overall, 10 patients (43%) achieved a marker-negative partial remission, three (13%) a marker-positive partial remission, five (22%) a disease stabilization and five (22%) progressed during treatment. Nine patients (39%) remained progression-free over 6 months following treatment, whereas 14 (61%) progressed. The outcome of high-dose chemotherapy was correctly predicted by positron emission tomography/CT scan/serum tumour marker in 91/59/48%. Eight patients with a favourably predicted outcome by CT scans plus serum tumour marker but a positive positron emission tomography prior to high-dose chemotherapy, failed treatment. This results in the following sensitivities/specificities for the prediction of failure of high-dose chemotherapy: positron emission tomography 100/78%; radiological monitoring 43/78%; serum tumour marker 15/100%. The positive and negative predictive values of positron emission tomography were 88 and 100%, respectively. As compared with the prognostic score, positron emission tomography was correctly positive in all patients of the three risk groups who failed treatment. In addition, a negative positron emission tomography correctly predicted a favourable outcome in the good and intermediate group. [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging can be used to assess response to chemotherapy in patients with relapsed germ cell tumours early in the course of treatment and may help to identify patients most likely to achieve a favourable response to subsequent high-dose chemotherapy. In patients with response to induction chemotherapy according to CT scans or serum tumour marker evaluation, positron emission tomography seems to add information to detect patients with an overall unfavourable outcome. It may also be a valuable addition to the prognostic model particularly in the good and intermediate group for further selection of patients who will profit from high-dose chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses various reports published within the issue, including one on a case series of 20 patients administered with bleomycin, vincristine and cisplatin and another on the treatment of 10 patients with pulmonary metastases.

• This ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline provides key recommendations on the management of testicular seminoma and non-seminoma. • Authorship includes a multidisciplinary group of experts from different institutions and countries in Europe. • Key treatment recommendations are provided. • Recommendations are based on available scientific data and the authors' collective expert opinion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: KRAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are used as predictive biomarkers to select therapy with EGFR monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Other factors may be significant determinants of benefit. Methods: Individual patient data from randomised trials with a head-to-head comparison between EGFR mAb versus no EGFR mAb (chemotherapy alone or best supportive care) in mCRC, across all lines of therapy, were pooled. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between groups. Treatment effects within the predefined KRAS biomarker subsets were estimated by adjusted hazard ratio (HRadj) and 95% confidence interval (CI). EGFR mAb efficacy was measured within the KRAS wild-type subgroup according to BRAF and NRAS mutation status. In both KRAS wild-type and mutant subgroups, additional factors that could impact EGFR mAb efficacy were explored including the type of chemotherapy, line of therapy, age, sex, tumour sidedness and site of metastasis. Results: 5675 patients from 8 studies were included, all with known mCRC KRAS mutation status. OS (HRadj 0.90, 95% CI 0.84–0.98, p = 0.01) and PFS benefit (HRadj 0.73, 95% CI 0.68–0.79, p < 0.001) from EGFR mAbs was observed in the KRAS wild-type group. PFS benefit was seen in patients treated with fluorouracil (HRadj 0.75, 95% CI 0.68–0.82) but not with capecitabine-containing regimens (HRadj 1.04, 95% CI 0.86–1.26) (pinteraction = 0.002). Sidedness also interacted with EGFR mAb efficacy, with survival benefit restricted to left-sided disease (pinteraction = 0.038). PFS benefits differed according to age, with benefits greater in those under 70 (pinteraction = 0.001). The survival benefit was not demonstrated in those patients with mutations found in the KRAS, NRAS or BRAF genes. The presence of liver metastases interacted with EGFR mAb efficacy in patients with KRAS mutant mCRC (pinteraction = 0.004). Conclusion: The benefit provided by EGFR mAbs in KRAS WT mCRC is associated with left-sided primary tumour location, younger patient age and absence of NRAS or BRAF mutations. Survival benefit is observed with fluorouracil but not capecitabine. Exploratory results support further research in KRAS mutant mCRC without liver metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Type II germ cell tumors represent the most common solid malignancy in men aged 15–45 years. Despite high cure rates of >90% over all stages, 10–15% of advanced patients develop treatment resistance and potentially succumb to their disease. Treatment of refractory germ cell tumors remains unsatisfactory, and new approaches are needed to further improve outcomes. Objectives: With this narrative review, we highlight epigenetic mechanisms related to resistance to standard systemic treatment, which may act as promising targets for novel combined epigenetic treatment approaches. Materials and methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE was conducted to identify original and review articles on resistance mechanisms and/or epigenetic treatment of germ cell tumors in vitro and in vivo. Review articles were hand‐searched to identify additional articles. Results: Distinct epigenetic phenomena have been linked to chemotherapy resistance in germ cell tumors, among which DNA hypermethylation, histone acetylation, and bromodomain proteins appear as promising targets for therapeutic exploitation. Inhibitors of key regulators, for example DNA methyltransferases (e.g. decitabine, guadecitabine), histone deacetylases (e.g. romidepsin), and bromodomain proteins (e.g. JQ1) decreased cell viability, triggered apoptosis, and growth arrest. Additionally, these epigenetic drugs induced differentiation and led to loss of pluripotency and re‐sensitization towards cisplatin in cell lines and animal models. Discussion: Epigenetic treatments hold promise to (i) reduce the treatment burden of and (ii) overcome resistance to standard cisplatin‐based chemotherapy. Combined approaches may enhance activity, while the ideal target and treatment combination of epigenetic drugs, either with another epigenetic agent or conventional cytotoxic agents need to be defined. Conclusion: Epigenetic (combination) treatment for germ cell tumors should be further explored in pre‐clinical and clinical research for its potential to further improve germ cell tumor treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Evaluates the effectiveness of administering irinotecan in patients with germ cell cancer. Dosage of the drug given; Impact of combining drugs with relatively low single-agent activity; Sensitivity of the patient to platinum therapy.

Summary: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) was reported as a rare complication of COVID‐19 vaccines. We conducted a retrospective single‐center analysis of all ITP cases detected in 2021 and compared the quantity with the pre‐vaccination years, from 2018 to 2020. In 2021, a two‐fold increase in ITP cases was identified compared to previous years; 11 of 40 cases (27.5%) were considered COVID‐19‐vaccine related. Our study highlights an increase in ITP cases at our institution, probably related to COVID‐19 vaccinations. Further studies are needed to investigate this finding globally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Points out that the aim of this issue is to summarize the most recent information on testicular germ cell tumors. Chemotherapy for germ cell cancer now based on clinical risk factors; Importance of avoiding toxicity in the standard treatment situation; Role of laparoscopic approaches in stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumors.

Background: Risk models of chemotherapy-induced (CIN) and febrile neutropenia (FN) have to date focused on determinants measured at the start of chemotherapy. We extended this static approach with a dynamic approach of CIN/FN risk modeling at the start of each cycle. Design: We applied predictive modeling using multivariate logistic regression to identify determinants of CIN/FN episodes and related hospitalizations and chemotherapy disturbances (CIN/FN consequences) in analyses at the patient ('ever' during the whole period of chemotherapy) and cycle-level (during a given chemotherapy cycle). Statistical dependence of cycle data being 'nested' under patients was managed using generalized estimation equations. Predictive performance of each model was evaluated using bootstrapped c concordance statistics. Results: Static patient-level risk models of 'ever' experiencing CIN/FN adverse events and consequences during a planned chemotherapy regimen included predictors related to history, risk factors, and prophylaxis initiation and intensity. Dynamic cycle-level risk models of experiencing CIN/FN adverse events and consequences in an upcoming cycle included predictors related to history, risk factors, and prophylaxis initiation and intensity; as well as prophylaxis duration, CIN/FN in prior cycle, and treatment center characteristics. Conclusion(s): These 'real-world evidence' models provide clinicians with the ability to anticipate CIN/FN adverse events and their consequences at the start of a chemotherapy line (static models); and, innovatively, to assess risk of CIN/ FN adverse events and their consequences at the start of each cycle (dynamic models). This enables individualized patient treatment and is consistent with the EORTC recommendation to re-appraise CIN/FN risk at the start of each cycle. Prophylaxis intensity (under-, correctly-, or over-prophylacted relative to current EORTC guidelines) is a major determinant. Under-prophylaxis is clinically unsafe. Over-prophylaxis of patients administered chemotherapy with intermediate or low myelotoxicity levels may be beneficial, both in patients with and without risk factors, and must be validated in future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction In haemophilia, clinical outcomes are mainly determined by the severity of clotting factor deficiency, treatment regimen, availability of clotting factor concentrate and age. Information about the relevance of patient-related factors such as education, social status or impact of the disease on the patient's life is scarce. Aim To assess the impact of social status and disease-related impairment of certain aspects of the patient's life on clinical and psychosocial outcomes in patients with inherited bleeding disorders ( PWBD). Methods Consecutive patients of a single centre were assessed by questionnaires on social status and quality of life ( SF-36). Social status was defined by school and professional education, employment and financial income of patients as well as school education of their parents. Results Fifty-seven PWBD (mean age, 38 ± 16 years) were enrolled, 60% were treated on-demand; PWBD had a median number of 2.5 (0-34) annual bleeds and a median orthopaedic joint score of 6 (0-38). No significant differences were found for clinical and psychosocial outcomes across social status groups. More than half of the patients reported that haemophilia had an impact on their school education, childhood and leisure activities. Patients with a high impact of haemophilia on their lives were less satisfied with their lives ( P < 0.002), reported worse quality of life in all domains of the SF-36, had a worse joint score ( P < 0.024) and reported more pain ( P < 0.013). Conclusion The perceived impact of haemophilia on patients' lives seems to have a stronger impact on clinical and psychosocial outcomes than patients' actual social status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Patients with cancer frequently experience chemotherapy-induced anaemia (CIA) and iron deficiency. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), iron supplementation and blood transfusions are available therapies. This study evaluated routine practice in CIA management. Methods Medical oncologists and/or haematologists from nine European countries (n=375) were surveyed on their last five cancer patients treated for CIA (n=1,730). Information was collected on tests performed at diagnosis of anaemia, levels of haemoglobin (Hb), serum ferritin and transferrin saturation (TSAT), as well as applied anaemia therapies. Results Diagnostic tests and therapies for CIA varied across Europe. Anaemia and iron status were mainly assessed by Hb (94 %) and ferritin (48 %) measurements. TSAT was only tested in 14 %. At anaemia diagnosis, 74% of patients had Hb ≤10 g/dL, including 15 % with severe anaemia (Hb <8 g/dL). Low-iron levels (ferritin ≤100 ng/mL) were detected in 42 % of evaluated patients. ESA was used in 63%of patients, blood transfusions in 52 % and iron supplementation in 31 % (74 % oral, 26 % intravenous iron). Only 30 % of ESA-treated patients received a combination of ESA and iron supplementation. Blood transfusions formed part of a regular anaemia treatment regimen in 76 % of transfused patients. Management practices were similar in 2009 and 2011. Conclusion Management of anaemia and iron status in patients treated for CIA varies substantially across Europe. Iron status is only assessed in half of the patients. In contrast to clinical evidence, iron treatment is underutilised and mainly based on oral iron supplementation. Implementation of guidelines needs to be increased to minimize the use of blood transfusions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In anemic cancer patients treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA), (i) to examine the proportion of variance in hemoglobin (Hb) outcomes attributable to patients versus center, country, and region and (ii) to develop predictive models of treatment response. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Goal: The benefit of supportive care with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) for patients with cancer-related anaemia is well known. However, the European Cancer Anaemia Survey (ECAS, data from 2001) showed that about 60% of cancer patients with anaemia do not receive any treatment. Since ECAS, evidence-based guidelines have provided recommendations for ESA use, but it is not known to what extent current treatment patterns follow these guidelines. To address this issue, the Anaemia Cancer Treatment (A.C.T.) study was initiated. The background to the development of the A.C.T. study and study methodology are described.Materials and Methods: The A.C.T. study is a global, retrospective, pharmacoepidemiologic study of at least 2,560 medical records of anaemic patients with cancer who were previously treated with an ESA from a minimum of 186 centres. Records from patients aged greater than or equal to 18 years with a diagnosis of solid tumour or myeloma or lymphoma and who were started on ESAs 3-12 months before inclusion and followed for 8-10 weeks will be eligible. Factors associated with ESA non-responsiveness will also be evaluated.Main Results: Completion of the European phase of the study is anticipated in late 2007 with the rest of the world closing in late 2007 or early 2008. Publication of findings is anticipated in 2008.Conclusions: By examining the extent to which anaemia management in clinical practice is congruent with best practice guidelines, the A.C.T. study will provide a further foundation for the development of evidence-based supportive cancer care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Purpose: To retrospectively re-evaluate a published prognostic score for response to salvage treatment in patients with germ-cell tumours relapsing or progressing after cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy. Patients and methods: From a database of 257 germ cell tumour (GCT) patients treated with salvage high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) we identified 176 patients (67%) with relapse or progression after first-line conventional-dose chemotherapy (CDCT). Patients were retrospectively grouped according to a published prognostic score defined by Fossa and colleagues [Fossa SD, Stenning SP, Gerl A, et al. Prognostic factors in patients progressing after cisplatin-based chemotherapy for malignant non-seminomatous germ cell tumors. Br J Cancer 1999; 80:1392–9]. Overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) after HDCT were retrospectively evaluated in each prognostic group. Results: After a median follow-up of 9 years the OS probability for all 176 patients was 38% and the EFS probability was 35%. The respective survival probability at 5 years in 100/176 (57%) good prognosis patients and 76/176 (43%) poor prognosis patients were 47% versus 28% for OS (p <0.001) and 41% versus 26% for EFS (p <0.005). Whereas survival probabilities did not differ in good prognosis patients, OS and EFS in poor prognosis patients were substantially better in the current series of patients treated with HDCT compared to the ones reported by Fossa treated with CDCT. Conclusion: This retrospective analysis confirms the impact of prognostic factors on the results of salvage treatment in patients with GCT and suggests a clinical benefit for patients with poor prognosis features receiving a single course of HDCT. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Colorectal cancer is a disease of the elderly, with 70% of patients being aged 65 years or older. In Western countries, the total number of elderly patients with this disease is expected to further increase in the future. Since the incidence of adverse physical or socioeconomic conditions in the elderly is higher than in younger patients, a thorough assessment of the patient's suitability for therapy should be performed before a decision is made. Using a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) to subdivide the population of elderly cancer patients into three groups can help to guide treatment decisions. Both in the adjuvant and in the palliative setting, there are sufficient data supporting the use of fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in fit elderly patients who can tolerate cytotoxic treatment. Systemic chemotherapy has been shown to effectively reduce mortality in the adjuvant situation and to be of clinical benefit for patients with metastatic disease in terms of longer survival, control of symptoms and quality of life. In recent years, new substances such as oxaliplatin or irinotecan have shown significant activity in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. However, information on how to guide the use of these new drugs in elderly patients is still lacking. Limited data from clinical trials indicate treatment efficacy in selected elderly patients comparable to that observed in younger patients, with overall manageable toxicity. Clearly, further clinical trials in elderly patients with colorectal cancer are necessary as well as the incorporation of aspects of geriatric medicine into the teaching programme of medical oncologists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Testicular germ cell tumours are a highly curable malignancy even in the presence of metastases, with an overall survival rate of approximately 90 to 95% when all stages are considered. Current therapeutic strategies aim at risk-adapted therapy, trying to maintain favourable overall results while reducing treatment-related toxicity, particularly in non-advanced disease. In stage I disease, unilateral inguinal orchiectomy represents the standard diagnostic and therapeutic approach. For patients with clinical stage I seminoma, prophylactic para-aortic radiotherapy with 26Gy is commonly employed. In patients with nonseminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT) at clinical stage I, the 3 options are: (i) retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy; (ii) a wait-and-see strategy; or (iii) 2 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. The individual risk profile for tumour recurrence, mainly based on histopathological criteria such as vascular tumour invasion, should guide treatment decisions in this group of patients. Radiotherapy is still the standard approach in clinical stage IIA/B seminoma, whereas in patients with a low tumour burden of NSGCT, retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy is frequently used followed by surveillance or adjuvant chemotherapy. Primary chemotherapy in these stages of disease may be at least equally successful. Major progress has also been achieved in the treatment of NSGCT patients with metastatic disease greater than clinical stage IIB, for whom primary chemotherapy represents the standard approach. After cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy, between 70 and 90% of patients will achieve a durable remission. In patients with ‘good risk’ metastatic disease, 3 cycles of cisplatin, etoposide and bleomycin (PEB) remain the standard treatment, despite several randomised trials trying to avoid the lung-toxic bleomycin or substituting cisplatin by carboplatin. In patients with ‘intermediate’ and ‘poor prognosis’ disease, 4 cycles of PEB given at 3-week intervals are considered routine treatment. The role of high dose chemotherapy with peripheral autologous blood stem cell transplantation is currently being investigated for patients presenting initially with advanced (poor prognosis) metastatic disease and for patients with relapse after previous chemotherapy, in whom conventional-dose salvage regimens will only result in 20% long-term survival. Because of the large group of patients with metastatic disease being cured, the possible long-term adverse effects of treatment have become important. Only a slightly elevated risk for therapy-related secondary malignancies has been identified. Long-term adverse effects associated with cisplatin may affect a larger proportion of patients. Further research should focus on reducing the risk of chemotherapy-related chronic toxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The inhibitory receptor TIGIT, as well as theectonucleotidases CD39 and CD73 constitute potential exhaustion markers for T cells. Detailed analysis of these markers can shed light into dysregulation of the T-cell response in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and will help to identify potential therapeutic targets. The phenotype and expression of transcription factors was assessed on different T-cell populations derived from peripheral blood (PB, n = 38) and bone marrow (BM, n = 43). PB and BM from patients with AML diagnosis, in remission and at relapse were compared with PB from healthy volunteers (HD) (n = 12) using multiparameter flow cytometry. An increased frequency of terminally differentiated (CD45R-CCR7-)CD8+ T cells was detected in PB and BM regardless of the disease state. Moreover, we detected an increased frequency of two distinct T-cell populations characterized by the co-expression of PD-1 or CD39 on TIGIT+CD73-CD8- T cells in newly diagnosed and relapsed AML in comparison to HDs. In contrast to the PD-1+TIGIT+CD73-CD8+ T-cell population, the frequency of CD39+TIGIT+CD73-CD8+ T cells was normalized in remission. PD-1+- and CD39+TIGIT+CD73-CD8+ T cells exhibited additional features of exhaustion by decreased expression of CD127 and TCF-1 and increased intracellular expression of the transcription factor TOX. CD8+ T cells in AML exhibit a key signature of two subpopulations, PD-1+TOX+TIGIT+CD73-CD8+- and CD39+TOX+TIGIT+CD73-CD8+ T cells that were increased at different stages of the disease. These results provide a rationale to analyze TIGIT blockade in combination with inhibition of the purinergic signaling and depletion of TOX to improve T-cell mediated cytotoxicity in AML. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) consensus conference on testicular cancer was held on 3–5 November 2016 in Paris, France. The conference included a multidisciplinary panel of 36 leading experts in the diagnosis and treatment of testicular cancer (34 panel members attended the conference; an additional two panel members [CB and K-PD] participated in all preparatory work and subsequent manuscript development). The aim of the conference was to develop detailed recommendations on topics relating to testicular cancer that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) and where the available level of evidence is insufficient. The main topics identified for discussion related to: (1) diagnostic work-up and patient assessment; (2) stage I disease; (3) stage II-III disease; (4) post-chemotherapy surgery, salvage chemotherapy, salvage and desperation surgery and special topics; and (5) survivorship and follow-up schemes. The experts addressed questions relating to one of the five topics within five working groups. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel. A consensus vote was obtained following whole-panel discussions, and the consensus recommendations were then further developed in post-meeting discussions in written form. This manuscript presents the results of the expert panel discussions, including the consensus recommendations and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation. All participants approved the final manuscript. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Bone metastases (BM) are rare in germ cell tumor (GCT) patients. Systematic data on risk factors, treatment and outcome are largely lacking. Patients and methods: A database created by an international consortium including 123 GCT patients with BM at primary diagnosis was retrospectively analysed. Survival estimates were calculated by the method of Kaplan-Meier and compared by log-rank testing. Cox regression analysis was applied for risk factor analyses. Results: In our cohort of patients, BM at primary diagnosis more often affected multiple sites (61%) and BM as the only metastatic site were scarce (9%). Histology was non-seminoma in 77% and seminoma in 23% of patients. After a median followup of 18 months (range, 0-228), estimated median PFS and OS were 21 (range, 0-225) and 98 months (95%CI, 36-160), respective 2-year PFS and OS rates were 34% and 45%. Negative prognosticators in univariate analysis were a mediastinal primary (PFS; HR 1.92; 95%CI, 1.05-3.50; OS; HR 2.16; 95%CI, 1.14-4.09) and the presence of liver and/or brain metastases (PFS; HR 1.89; 95%CI, 1.13-3.17; OS; HR 1.91; 95%CI, 0.024) Seminomatous histology was the strongest predictor for favorable PFS (multivariate Cox regression; HR, 0.32; P=0.011) with respective 2-year PFS and OS rates of 68% and 75% compared with 24% and 36% for nonseminoma patients. Conclusions: Outcome of GCT patients with primary metastatic bone disease is particularly poor in non-seminoma patients, even worse than the expected outcomes of the general IGCCCG 'poor prognosis' group. This series does not indicate that mutlimodal treatment improves the prognosis over stage-adapted chemotherapy alone, however, the statistical power of these results is limited due to low patient numbers in each specific subgroup. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Multimodality treatment improves the chance of survival but increases the risk for long-term side effects in young cancer survivors, so-called" Adolescents and Young Adults"(AYAs). Compared to the general population AYAs have a 5 to 15-fold increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity. Thus, improving modifiable lifestyle risk factors is of particular importance. Methods: The INAYA trial included AYAs between 18 and 39 years receiving an intensified individual nutrition counseling at four time points in a 3-month period based on a 3-day dietary record. At week 0 and 12 AYAs got a face-to-face counseling, at week 2 and 6 by telephone. Primary endpoint was change in nutritional behavior measured by Healthy Eating Index - European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (HEI-EPIC). Results: Twenty-three AYAs (11 female, 12 male, median age 20 years (range 19-23 years), median BMI: 21. 4 kg/m2 (range: 19.7-23.9 kg/m2) after completion of cancer treatment for sarcoma (n = 2), carcinoma (n = 2), blastoma (n = 1), hodgkin lymphoma (n = 12), or leukemia (n = 6) were included (median time between diagnosis and study inclusion was 44 month). The primary endpoint was met, with an improvement of 20 points in HEI-EPIC score in 52.2% (n = 12) of AYAs. At baseline, median HEI-EPIC score was 47.0 points (range from 40.0 to 55.0 points) and a good, moderate and bad nutritional intake was seen in 4.3, 73.9 and 21.7% of AYAs. At week 12, median HEI-EPIC improved significantly to 65.0 points (range from 55.0 to 76.0 points) (p = 0.001) and a good, moderate and bad nutritional intake was seen in 47.8, 52.2 and 0% of AYAs. No change was seen in quality of life, waisthip ratio and blood pressure. Conclusion: Intensified nutrition counseling is feasible and seem to improve nutritional behavior of AYAs. Further studies will be required to demonstrate long-term sustainability and confirm the results in a randomized design in larger cohorts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Despite similar residual factor VIII activity, patients with haemophilia A ( HA) show significant interindividual variability with regard to bleeding frequency and severity, suggesting that additional factors modulate thrombin generation and fibrin deposition. Protein disulphide isomerase ( PDI) is an abundant oxidoreductase that exerts pleiotropic effects in primary and secondary haemostasis and contributes to thrombosis and vascular inflammation. Aim We conducted a pilot study to explore a potential role of platelet PDI in patients with HA. Methods Expression and release of platelet PDI were studied by flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. Results Compared to healthy male controls ( n = 12), patients with HA ( n = 24) showed significantly increased expression of PDI antigen on ADP- or TRAP-6-, but not on buffer-treated platelets, a finding that could not be explained by enhanced platelet activation, as indicated by expression of the α-granule protein, CD62P (P-selectin). While platelet agonists did not affect PDI secretion in healthy male controls, increased levels of PDI antigen were found in supernatants of TRAP-6-treated platelets from patients with HA. Importantly, in two patients with exceedingly high TRAP-6-induced PDI release over baseline, findings were consistent when platelets were isolated and stimulated on a separate occasion. No obvious association was found between platelet PDI and bleeding phenotype in this patient cohort. Conclusion Agonist-induced expression and release of platelet PDI were increased in patients with HA. Larger studies are needed to clarify if variations in this platelet response contribute to the diversity in bleeding frequency and severity among patients with congenital factor VIII deficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This prospective study aimed to determine the extent to which cancer patients experience loss of dignity during primary cancer care (baseline) and at 3-month follow-up and the contribution of positive social support and detrimental social interactions on loss of dignity at follow-up.Methods: At baseline, we enrolled N = 270 cancer patients (advanced cancer 57 %) undergoing oncological treatment. At follow-up, n = 178 patients (72 %) participated. Patients completed the following questionnaires: sense of dignity item (SDI), physical problem list of the NCCN Distress Thermometer, Illness-Specific Social Support Scale (SSUK), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7). We conducted ordinal regression analyses controlling for age, gender, tumor stage, number of physical symptoms, depression, and anxiety.Results: At baseline, 18 % of the patients experienced moderate to extreme loss of dignity (follow-up 23 %, p = 0.27). Detrimental interactions significantly predicted loss of dignity (OR = 1.42, 95 % CI 1.06-1.90) in a model including positive support (OR = 1.10, 95 % CI 0.82-1.49), depression (OR = 1.55, 95 % CI 0.96-2.51), and anxiety (OR = 1.20, 95 % CI 0.83-1.74). Items in relation to detrimental interactions with significant others such as "made you feel like you couldn't take care of yourself" (r = 0.29, p < 0.001) and "felt uncomfortable in illness conversations" (r = 0.24, p = 0.002) showed the highest associations with perceived loss of dignity.Conclusion: Loss of dignity was a frequent problem in our mixed cancer patient sample. Detrimental interactions that weaken the sense of dignity may result from discrepancies with patients' needs for autonomy and security. Tailoring social support to attachment-related patient needs may help to conserve patients' sense of dignity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Despite a good prognosis, the typically young age at diagnosis and physical sequelae may cause psychological distress in germ cell tumor survivors. We aimed to determine the frequency of anxiety and depression and analyze the impact of demographic and disease-related factors. Method We enrolled N = 164 testicular germ cell tumor survivors receiving routine follow-up care at the University Cancer Center Hamburg and a specialized private practice (mean, 11.6 years after diagnosis). Patients completed the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener-7, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Short Form. Results We found clinically significant anxiety present in 6.1% and depression present in 7.9% of survivors. A higher number of physical symptoms and having children were significantly associated with higher levels of both anxiety and depression in multivariate regression analyses controlling for age at diagnosis, cohabitation, socioeconomic status, time since diagnosis, metastatic disease and relapse. Younger age at diagnosis and shorter time since diagnosis were significantly associated with higher anxiety. Conclusion Although rates of clinically relevant anxiety and depression were comparably low, attention toward persisting physical symptoms and psychosocial needs related to a young age at diagnosis and having children will contribute to address potential long-term psychological distress in germ cell tumor survivors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The humanised αν integrin-inhibitory monoclonal antibody abituzumab may extend overall survival when combined with cetuximab and irinotecan in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer with high integrin αvβ6 expression. The tolerability of abituzumab in combination with cetuximab and irinotecan is acceptable.Background Integrins are involved in tumour progression and metastasis, and differentially expressed on colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. Abituzumab (EMD 525797), a humanised monoclonal antibody targeting integrin αν heterodimers, has demonstrated preclinical activity. This trial was designed to assess the tolerability of different doses of abituzumab in combination with cetuximab and irinotecan (phase I) and explore the efficacy and tolerability of the combination versus that of cetuximab and irinotecan in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) (phase II part). Methods Eligible patients had KRAS (exon 2) wild-type mCRC and had received prior oxaliplatin-containing therapy. The trial comprised an initial safety run-in using abituzumab doses up to 1000 mg combined with a standard of care (SoC: cetuximab plus irinotecan) and a phase II part in which patients were randomised 1 : 1 : 1 to receive abituzumab 500 mg (arm A) or 1000 mg (arm B) every 2 weeks combined with SoC, or SoC alone (arm C). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), response rate (RR) and tolerability. Associations between tumour integrin expression and outcomes were also assessed. Results Phase I showed that abituzumab doses up to 1000 mg were well tolerated in combination with SoC. Seventy-three (arm A), 71 (arm B) and 72 (arm C) patients were randomised to the phase II part. Baseline characteristics were balanced. PFS was similar in the three arms: arm A versus SoC, hazard ratio (HR) 1.13 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78–1.64]; arm B versus SoC, HR 1.11 (95% CI 0.77–1.61). RRs were also similar. A trend toward improved OS was observed: arm A versus SoC, HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.54–1.28); arm B versus SoC, HR 0.80 (95% CI 0.52–1.25). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in 72%, 78% and 67% of patients. High tumour integrin αvβ6 expression was associated with longer OS in arms A [HR 0.55 (0.30–1.00)] and B [HR 0.41 (0.21–0.81)] than in arm C. Conclusion The primary PFS end point was not met, although predefined exploratory biomarker analyses identified subgroups of patients in whom abituzumab may have benefit. The tolerability of abituzumab combined with cetuximab and irinotecan was acceptable. Further study is warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01008475 [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]