Search

Purpose: To analyze the rates of concordance in the diagnosis of various hematological malignancies among patients referred to a tertiary cancer center, comparing the referring diagnosis with the final diagnosis at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.Patients and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study analyzing the 409 patients referred to the M.D. Anderson Leukemia Service in 1995 in whom a bone marrow examination was performed by the referring physician and in whom this examination was repeated at our institution. We also analyzed 100 cases, including 84 of the 409 referred patients for whom the diagnostic outside bone marrow slide had been sent for review.Results: The overall concordance rate was 73%. In 18% discordances were present and considered of major importance (affecting treatment and/or prognosis) while in 9% there were minor discordances. Major discordance rates were 2% for chronic lymphocytic leukemic leukemia and 5% for chronic myelogenous leukemia, but 29% for acute myelogenous leukemia (79 patients), 43% for acute promyelocytic leukemia (7 patients), 19% for acute lymphocytic leukemia (42 patients), 57% for hairy cell leukemia (7 patients), and 23% for the myelodysplastic syndromes (75 patients). The concordance rate was 76% in the 100 cases in which bone marrow specimens permitted comparison of the morphologic diagnosis made by M.D. Anderson and the referring physician using the same slide, with a rate of 75% in the acute leukemias as finally diagnosed at our institution.Conclusion: Although in the majority of cases the referring physicians and the specialty service agreed on diagnosis, major discordance occurs in a significant number of cases, including highly treatable diseases such as acute promyelocystic leukemia and hairy cell leukemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R HL) is a challenging disease with limited treatment options beyond brentuximab vedotin and checkpoint inhibitors. Herein we present the time‐trend analysis of R/R HL patients who received allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo‐HCT) at our center from 2001–2017. Methods: The patients were divided into two distinct treatment cohorts: era1 (2001–2010), and era2 (2011–2017). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression‐free survival (PFS), non‐relapse mortality (NRM), and cumulative incidence of acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD). Results: Among the 51 patients included in the study, 29 were in era1, and 22 were in era2. There was decreased use of myeloablative conditioning in era2 (18% vs. 31%) compared to era1 and 95% of patients in era2 previously received brentuximab Vedotin (BV). Haploidentical donors were seen exclusively in era2 (0% vs. 14%) and more patients received alternative donor transplants (7% vs. 32%) in era2. The 4‐year OS (34% vs. 83%, p < 0.001) and 4‐year PFS (28% vs. 62%, p = 0.001) were significantly inferior in era1 compared to era2. The incidence of 1‐year NRM was lower in era2 compared to era1 (5% vs. 34%, p = 0.06). The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD at day 100 was similar in both eras (p = 0.50), but the incidence of chronic GVHD at 1 year was higher in era2 compared to era1 (55% vs. 21%, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Despite the advent of novel therapies, allo‐HCT remains an important therapeutic option for patients with R/R HL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is recommended for patients with T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) in second or later complete remission (CR) and high-risk patients in first CR. Given its relative rarity, data on outcomes of HCT for T-ALL are limited. We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study using data from 208 adult patients who underwent HCT between 2000 and 2014 to describe outcomes of allogeneic HCT for T-ALL in the contemporary era. The median age at HCT was 37 years, and the majority of patients underwent HCT in CR, using total body irradiation (TBI)-based myeloablative conditioning regimens. One-quarter of the patients underwent alternative donor HCT using a mismatched, umbilical cord blood, or haploidentical donor. With a median follow up of 38 months, overall survival at 5 years was 34%. The corresponding cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality and relapse was 26% and 41%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, factors significantly associated with overall survival were the use of TBI (HR, 0.57; P  = .021), age >35 years (HR, 1.55; P  = .025), and disease status at HCT (HR, 1.98; P  = .005 for relapsed/refractory disease compared with CR). Relapse was the most common cause of death (58% of patients). Allogeneic HCT remains a potentially curative option in selected patients with adult T-ALL, although relapse is a major cause of treatment failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Relapse is a major cause of treatment failure after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT). Treatment options for relapse have been inadequate, and the majority of patients ultimately die of their disease. There is no standard approach to treating relapse after alloHSCT. Withdrawal of immune suppression and donor lymphocyte infusions are commonly used for all diseases; although these interventions are remarkably effective for relapsed chronic myelogenous leukemia, they have limited efficacy in other hematologic malignancies. Conventional and novel chemotherapy, monoclonal antibody therapy, targeted therapies, and second transplants have been utilized in a variety of relapsed diseases, but reports on these therapies are generally anecdotal and retrospective. As such, there is an immediate need for well-designed, disease-specific trials for treatment of relapse after alloHSCT. This report summarizes current treatment options under investigation for relapse after alloHSCT in a disease-specific manner. In addition, recommendations are provided for specific areas of research necessary in the treatment of relapse after alloHSCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]