1. Silicone ring tourniquet versus pneumatic cuff tourniquet in carpal tunnel release: a randomized comparative study.
- Author
-
Drosos, G., Ververidis, A., Stavropoulos, N., Mavropoulos, R., Tripsianis, G., and Kazakos, K.
- Subjects
- *
SILICON , *TOURNIQUETS , *CARPAL tunnel syndrome treatment , *LOCAL anesthesia , *RANDOMIZED controlled trials , *MEDICAL databases , *POSTOPERATIVE pain , *THERAPEUTICS - Abstract
Background: The aim of the present study was to compare the pain levels resulting from the use of a silicone ring tourniquet (SRT) to those resulting from the use of a classic pneumatic cuff tourniquet (PT) in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release under local anesthesia. Materials and methods: Fifty patients that underwent carpal tunnel release under local anesthesia were randomized using the technique of stratified randomization by minimization. A forearm tourniquet was applied: a standard PT was used in 25 patients, and an SRT was used in the other 25 patients (the model of SRT used was selected according to the standard systolic blood pressure). Patient demographics and complications were recorded. Pain levels were assessed with the visual analogue scale and were recorded (a) just after tourniquet application, (b) 5 min after tourniquet application, and (c) just before tourniquet removal. Results: There was no statistical significant difference in patient demographics between the two groups. The mean tourniquet time was similar for both groups ( p = 1.000). The difference between the mean final pain level and the mean initial pain level was statistically significant for the SRT group ( p = 0.010) and highly statistically significant for the PT group ( p < 0.001). The mean final pain level for the PT group was higher than that for the SRT group ( p = 0.043). Conclusions: According to the findings of this study, in patients who underwent carpal tunnel release under local anesthesia, the pain levels at the end of the operation and those just before the removal of the tourniquet were higher in the PT group than in the SRT group of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF