1. Management of Patients with Vulvar Cancers: A Systematic Comparison of International Guidelines (NCCN–ASCO–ESGO–BGCS–IGCS–FIGO–French Guidelines–RCOG).
- Author
-
Restaino, Stefano, Pellecchia, Giulia, Arcieri, Martina, Bogani, Giorgio, Taliento, Cristina, Greco, Pantaleo, Driul, Lorenza, Chiantera, Vito, De Vincenzo, Rosa Pasqualina, Garganese, Giorgia, Sopracordevole, Francesco, Di Donato, Violante, Ciavattini, Andrea, Scollo, Paolo, Scambia, Giovanni, and Vizzielli, Giuseppe
- Subjects
- *
MEDICAL protocols , *ELECTROTHERAPEUTICS , *BIOPSY , *PALLIATIVE treatment , *DISEASE management , *ONCOLOGIC surgery , *IMMUNOTHERAPY , *VULVAR tumors , *MEDICAL societies , *CANCER chemotherapy , *PLASTIC surgery , *HEALTH care teams - Abstract
Simple Summary: Vulvar tumors are uncommon and have a considerable impact on the functional and aesthetic well-being of those affected. Their treatment necessitates a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach at various levels, highlighting the importance of having standardized recommendations that are aligned with the latest scientific findings. Are scientific guidelines aligning with the advancements made in this field of oncology, spanning from diagnosis to palliative care at various levels? To address this, we conducted a systematic comparison of the main European and American guidelines for vulvar cancer management to assess their current status of update. From our comparisons, many divergences emerged in management strategies. Among them, lack of reference to the most up-to-date diagnostic classification systems, indication for an integrated gyneco-oncologic and plastic surgical approach to postoperative management with the most modern advanced dressing devices and palliative setting with the use of immuno- and electrochemotherapy. Background: Vulvar carcinoma is an uncommon gynecological tumor primarily affecting older women. Its treatment significantly impacts the quality of life and, not least, aesthetics because of the mutilating surgery it requires. Objectives: The management requires a multidisciplinary team of specialists who know how to care for the patient in her entirety, not neglecting psychological aspects and reconstructive surgery. How do the guidelines address multidisciplinarity, team surgical management, passing through preoperative diagnosis, and follow-up in such a challenging rare tumor to treat? Methods: To answer these questions, we compared the main scientific recommendations to identify similarities and differences in diagnostic and therapeutic management to provide an overview of the gaps that there are currently in European and American international recommendations in providing management guidance in a cancer that is both among the rarest and most difficult to manage. In this way, we aim to encourage an update in practices based on the latest scientific evidence. Results: A review of various international guidelines, some dating back to 2014, shows significant variation in approaches, ranging from initial diagnostic procedures to managing relapses. The most recent guidelines also lacked references to the latest literature, indicating that more robust scientific evidence is needed before new treatments, such as electrochemotherapy for palliation and reconstructive surgery post exenteration, can be widely adopted. Conclusions: From the systematic comparison of the main international guidelines, a strong heterogeneity emerged in the diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations as well as for the multidisciplinary approach that today is essential. Our work certainly stimulated an update of the main guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF