Search

The list of standard abbreviations for JDS is available at adsa.org/jds-abbreviations-24. Nonstandard abbreviations are available in the Notes. Study objectives were to compare the immune response, metabolism, and production following intramammary LPS (IMM LPS) administration in early and mid-lactation cows. Early (E-LPS; n = 11; 20 ± 4 DIM) and mid- (M-LPS; n = 10; 155 ± 40 DIM) lactation cows were enrolled in an experiment consisting of 2 periods (P). During P1 (5 d) cows were fed ad libitum and baseline data were collected, including liver and muscle biopsies. At the beginning of P2 (3 d) cows received 10 mL of sterile saline containing 10 µg of LPS from Escherichia coli O111:B4/mL into the left rear quarter of the mammary gland, and liver and muscle biopsies were collected at 12 h after LPS. Tissues were analyzed for metabolic flexibility, which measures substrate switching capacity from pyruvic acid to palmitic acid oxidation. Data were analyzed with the MIXED procedure in SAS 9.4. Rectal temperature was assessed hourly for the first 12 h after LPS and every 6 h thereafter for the remainder of P2. All cows developed a febrile response following LPS, but E-LPS had a more intense fever than M-LPS cows (0.7°C at 5 h after LPS). Blood samples were collected at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 h after LPS for analysis of systemic inflammation and metabolism parameters. Total serum Ca decreased after LPS (26% at 6 h nadir) but did not differ by lactation stage (LS). Circulating neutrophils decreased, then increased after LPS in both LS, but E-LPS had exaggerated neutrophilia (56% from 12 to 48 h) compared with M-LPS. Haptoglobin increased after LPS (15-fold) but did not differ by LS. Many circulating cytokines were increased after LPS, and IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, MCP-1, and IP-10 were further augmented in E-LPS compared with M-LPS cows. Relative to P1, all cows had reduced milk yield (26%) and DMI (14%) on d 1 that did not differ by LS. Somatic cell score increased rapidly in response to LPS regardless of LS and gradually decreased from 18 h onwards. Milk component yields decreased after LPS. However, E-LPS had increased fat (11%) and tended to have increased lactose (8%) yield compared with M-LPS cows throughout P2. Circulating glucose was not affected by LPS. Nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA) decreased in E-LPS (29%) but not M-LPS cows. β-Hydroxybutyrate slightly increased (14%) over time after LPS regardless of LS. Insulin increased after LPS in all cows, but E-LPS had blunted hyperinsulinemia (52%) compared with M-LPS cows. Blood urea nitrogen increased after LPS, and the relative change in BUN was elevated in E-LPS cows compared with M-LPS cows (36% and 13%, respectively, from 9 to 24 h). During P1, metabolic flexibility was increased in liver and muscle in early lactating cows compared with mid-lactation cows, but 12 h after LPS, metabolic flexibility was reduced and did not differ by LS. In conclusion, IMM LPS caused severe immune activation, and E-LPS cows had a more intense inflammatory response compared with M-LPS cows, but the effects on milk synthesis was similar between LS. Some parameters of the E-LPS metabolic profile suggest continuation of metabolic adjustments associated with early lactation to support both a robust immune system and milk synthesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The list of standard abbreviations for JDS is available at adsa.org/jds-abbreviations-24. Nonstandard abbreviations are available in the Notes. Most immunometabolic research uses mid-lactation (ML) cows. Cows in early lactation (EL) are in a presumed state of immune suppression/dysregulation and less is known about how they respond to a pathogen. Study objectives were to compare the production and metabolic responses to i.v. LPS and to differentiate between the direct effects of immune activation and the indirect effects of illness-induced hypophagia in EL and ML cows. Cows in EL (n = 11; 20 ± 2 DIM) and ML (n = 12; 131 ± 31 DIM) were enrolled in a 2 × 2 factorial design containing 2 experimental periods (P). During P1 (3 d), cows were fed ad libitum and baseline data were collected. At the initiation of P2 (3 d), cows were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatments by lactation stage (LS): (1) EL (EL-LPS; n = 6) or ML (ML-LPS; n = 6) cows administered i.v. a single bolus of 0.09 µg LPS/kg of BW; Escherichia coli O55:B5 or (2) pair-fed (PF) EL (EL-PF; n = 5) or ML (ML-PF; n = 6) cows administered i.v. saline. Administering LPS decreased DMI and this was more severe in EL-LPS than ML-LPS cows (34% and 11% relative to baseline, respectively). By design, P2 DMI patterns were similar in the PF groups compared with their LPS counterparts. Milk yield decreased following LPS (42% on d 1 relative to P1) and despite an exacerbated decrease in EL-LPS cows on d 1 (25% relative to ML-LPS), remained similar between LS from d 2 to 3. The EL-LPS cows had increased milk fat content, but no difference in protein and lactose percentages compared with ML-LPS cows. Further, cumulative ECM yield was increased (21%) in EL-LPS compared with ML-LPS cows. During P2, EL-LPS cows had a more intense increase in MUN and BUN than ML-LPS and EL-PF cows. Administering LPS did not cause hypoglycemia in either EL-LPS or ML-LPS cows, but glucose was increased (33%) in EL-LPS compared with EL-PF. Hyperinsulinemia occurred after LPS, and insulin was further increased in ML-LPS than EL-LPS cows (2.2-fold at 12 h peak). During P2, circulating glucagon increased only in EL-LPS cows (64% relative to all other groups). Both EL groups had increased NEFA at 3 and 6 h after LPS from baseline (56%), but NEFA in EL-LPS cows gradually returned to baseline thereafter and were reduced relative to EL-PF until 36 h (50% from 12 to 24 h). Alterations in BHB did not differ between ML groups, but EL-LPS had reduced BHB compared with EL-PF from 24 to 72 h (51%). Results indicate that there are distinct LS differences in the anorexic and metabolic responses to immune activation. Collectively, EL cows are more sensitive to the catabolic effects of LPS than ML cows, but these exacerbated metabolic responses appear coordinated to fuel an augmented immune system while simultaneously supporting milk synthesis. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The list of standard abbreviations for JDS is available at adsa.org/jds-abbreviations-24. Nonstandard abbreviations are available in the Notes. Cows in early lactation (EL) are purportedly immune suppressed, which renders them more susceptible to disease. Thus, the study objective was to compare key biomarkers of immune activation from i.v. LPS between EL and mid-lactation (ML) cows. Multiparous EL (20 ± 2 DIM; n = 11) and ML (131 ± 31 DIM; n = 12) cows were enrolled in a 2 × 2 factorial design and assigned to 1 of 2 treatments by lactation stage (LS): (1) EL (EL-LPS; n = 6) or ML (ML-LPS; n = 6) cows administered a single LPS bolus from Escherichia coli O55:B5 (0.09 µg/kg of BW), or (2) pair-fed (PF) EL (EL-PF; n = 5) or ML (ML-PF; n = 6) cows administered i.v. saline. After LPS administration, cows were intensely evaluated for 3 d to analyze their response and recovery to LPS. Rectal temperature increased in LPS relative to PF cows (1.1°C in the first 9 h), and the response was more severe in EL-LPS relative to ML-LPS cows (2.3 vs. 1.3°C increase at 4 h post-LPS; respectively). Respiration rate increased only in EL-LPS cows (47% relative to ML-LPS in the first hour post-LPS). Circulating tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-6, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α, MIP-1β, and IFN-γ-inducible protein-10 increased within the first 6 h after LPS and these changes were exacerbated in EL-LPS relative to ML-LPS cows (6.3-fold, 4.8-fold, 57%, 93%, 10%, and 61%, respectively). All cows administered LPS had decreased circulating iCa relative to PF cows (34% at the 6 h nadir), but the hypocalcemia was more severe in EL-LPS than ML-LPS cows (14% at 6 h nadir). In response to LPS, neutrophils decreased regardless of LS, then increased into neutrophilia by 24 h in all LPS relative to PF cows (2-fold); however, the neutrophilic phase was augmented in EL- compared with ML-LPS cows (63% from 24 to 72 h). Lymphocytes and monocytes rapidly decreased then gradually returned to baseline in LPS cows regardless of LS; however, monocytes were increased (57%) at 72 h in EL-LPS relative to ML-LPS cows. Platelets were reduced (46%) in LPS relative to PF cows throughout the 3-d following LPS, and from 24 to 48 h, platelets were further decreased (41%) in EL-LPS compared with ML-LPS. During the 3-d following LPS, serum amyloid A (SAA), LPS-binding protein (LBP), and haptoglobin (Hp) increased in LPS compared with PF groups (9-fold, 72%, and 153-fold, respectively), and the LBP and Hp responses were more exaggerated in EL-LPS than ML-LPS cows (85 and 79%, respectively) whereas the SAA response did not differ by LS. Thus, our data indicates that EL immune function does not appear "suppressed," and in fact many aspects of the immune response are seemingly functionally robust. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives were to evaluate the effects of Bacillus subtilis PB6 (BSP) on gastrointestinal tract permeability, metabolism, inflammation, and production parameters in periparturient Holstein cows. Multiparous cows (n = 48) were stratified by previous 305-d mature equivalent milk yield and parity and assigned to 1 of 2 top-dressed dietary treatments 21 d before expected calving through 63 DIM: (1) control (CON; 13 g/d calcium carbonate; n = 24) or (2) BSP (13 g/d BSP; CLOSTAT, Kemin Industries, Des Moines, IA; n = 24). Gastrointestinal tract permeability was evaluated in vivo using the oral paracellular marker chromium (Cr)-EDTA. Effects of treatment, time, and treatment × time were assessed using PROC MIXED of SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc.). Prepartum dry matter intake (DMI) was unaffected by treatment; however, BSP supplementation decreased postpartum DMI relative to CON (0.7 kg). Milk yield, energy-corrected milk (ECM), fat-corrected milk (FCM), and solids-corrected milk (SCM) increased in BSP cows compared with CON (1.6, 1.8, 1.6, and 1.5 kg, respectively). Decreased DMI and increased production collectively improved feed efficiency of milk yield, ECM, FCM, and SCM for BSP cows (6, 5, 5, and 5%, respectively). No treatment differences were observed for concentrations of milk fat, protein, total solids, somatic cell count, somatic cell score, body weight, or body condition score. Milk urea nitrogen concentrations decreased (5%), whereas milk protein and lactose yield increased (5 and 2%, respectively) with BSP supplementation. Prepartum fecal pH did not differ among treatments; conversely, postpartum fecal pH was increased with BSP supplementation (0.09 pH units). Prepartum fecal dry matter percentage, starch, acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, and ethanol did not differ among treatments. Postpartum concentrations of the aforementioned fecal parameters were also unaffected by treatment, but fecal propionic acid concentration was decreased (24%) in BSP cows relative to CON. Circulating glucose, nonesterified fatty acids, l -lactate, and insulin were similar between treatments both pre- and postpartum. Prepartum β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) did not differ between treatments, but postpartum BSP supplementation decreased (21%) circulating BHB relative to CON. Regardless of treatment, inflammatory markers (serum amyloid A and haptoglobin) peaked immediately following parturition and progressively decreased with time, but this pattern was not influenced by treatment. Postpartum lipopolysaccharide binding protein tended to be decreased on d 3 in BSP relative to CON cows (19%). Neither treatment nor time affected Cr-EDTA area under the curve. In summary, supplementing BSP had no detectable effects prepartum, but increased key postpartum production parameters. Bacillus subtilis PB6 consistently increased postpartum fecal pH and decreased fecal propionate concentrations but did not appear to have an effect on gastrointestinal tract permeability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Subacute rumen acidosis may cause postruminal intestinal barrier dysfunction, but this does not appear to be due to increased hindgut fermentation. Alternatively, intestinal hyperpermeability may be explained by the plethora of potentially harmful substances (e.g., ethanol, endotoxin, and amines) produced in the rumen during subacute rumen acidosis, which are difficult to isolate in traditional in vivo experiments. Therefore, objectives were to evaluate whether abomasal infusion of acidotic rumen fluid collected from donor (Donor) cows elicits systemic inflammation or alters metabolism or production in healthy recipients. Ten rumen-cannulated lactating dairy cows [249 ± 63 d in milk; 753 ± 32 kg of body weight (BW)] were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 abomasal infusion treatments: (1) healthy rumen fluid (HF; 5 L/h; n = 5) or (2) acidotic rumen fluid (AF; 5 L/h; n = 5) infused. Eight rumen-cannulated cows [4 dry, 4 lactating (lactating = 391 ± 220 d in milk); 760 ± 70 kg of BW] were used as Donor cows. All 18 cows were acclimated to a high-fiber diet (46% neutral detergent fiber; 14% starch) during an 11-d prefeeding period during which rumen fluid was collected for the eventual infusion into HF cows. During period (P) 1 (5 d), baseline data were obtained and on d 5 Donor were corn-challenged (2.75% BW ground corn after 16 h of 75% feed restriction). Cows were fasted until 36 h relative to rumen acidosis induction (RAI), and data were collected through 96 h RAI. At 12 h RAI, an additional 0.50% BW of ground corn was added, and acidotic fluid collections began (7 L/Donor every 2 h; 6 M HCl was added to collected fluid until pH was between 5.0 and 5.2). On d 1 of P2 (4 d), HF/AF cows were abomasally infused with their respective treatments for 16 h, and data were collected for 96 h relative to the first infusion. Data were analyzed in SAS (SAS Institute Inc.) using PROC MIXED. Following the corn challenge in the Donor cows, rumen pH only mildly decreased at nadir (pH = 5.64 at 8 h RAI) and remained above the desired threshold for both acute (5.2) and subacute (5.6) acidosis. In contrast, fecal and blood pH markedly decreased to acidotic levels (nadir = 4.65 and 7.28 at 36 and 30 h RAI, respectively), and fecal pH remained below 5 from 22 to 36 h RAI. In Donor cows, dry matter intake remained decreased through d 4 (36% relative to baseline) and serum amyloid A and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein markedly increased by 48 h RAI in Donor cows (30- and 3-fold, respectively). In cows that received the abomasal infusions, fecal pH decreased in AF from 6 to 12 h relative to the first infusion (7.07 vs. 6.33) compared with HF; however, milk yield, dry matter intake, energy-corrected milk, rectal temperature, serum amyloid A, and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein were unaffected. Overall, the corn challenge did not cause subacute rumen acidosis but markedly decreased fecal and blood pH and stimulated a delayed inflammatory response in the Donor cows. Abomasal infusion of rumen fluid from corn-challenged Donor cows decreased fecal pH but did not cause inflammation, nor did it create an immune-activated phenotype in recipient cows. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]