Search

• The bivalent booster dose increases neutralizing antibodies against BA.5, BQ.1.1, XBB.1 in people living with HIV (PLWH) • PLWH with a hybrid immunity developed higher and broader neutralization against BA.5 • A cross-neutralization activity was found for BQ.1.1. and XBB.1 • Our data support offering a bivalent messenger RNA vaccine booster to advanced PLWH To investigate immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine third booster dose (3BD; fifth dose) with bivalent vaccine original/BA4/5 vaccine in people living with HIV (PLWH). This is an observational cohort study to evaluate the outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (HIV-VAC study). We analyzed microneutralization assay and interferon-γ production in 48 PLWH on antiretroviral therapy with clusters of differentiation (CD4) count <200 cell/mm3 and/or previous AIDS according to immunization status: vaccinated PLWH who had a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (hybrid immunization, HI) vs those only vaccinated (non-hybrid immunization, nHI) and current CD4 count. After 15 days from its administration (T1), the 3BD bivalent messenger RNA vaccine elicited a statistically significant increase of neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) geometric mean titers from T0 to T1 against W-D614G (fold increase 4.8; P <0.0001), BA.5 (8.6 P <0.0001), BQ.1.1 (6.4, P <0.0001) and XBB.1 (6.5, P <0.0001). When compared to BA.5, nAbs geometric mean titers against BQ.1.1 and XBB.1 decreased by 3.5 and 4.1-fold, respectively. After controlling for age, years from AIDS diagnosis, CD4 count at administration and CD4 count nadir, the fold change reduction in nAbs response to other variants of concerns as compared to BA.1, was larger in participants with HI vs those nHI: 0.59 lower (95% confidence interval 0.36-0.97, P = 0.04) for BQ.1.1 and 0.67 lower (95% confidence interval: 0.47-0.96, P = 0.03) for XBB.1. In contrast, the analysis carried little evidence for an association between current CD4 count and response to the fifth dose of bivalent vaccine. Furthermore, cell-mediated immunity remained stable. Our data support the current recommendation of offering bivalent mRNA vaccine booster doses to PLWH with low CD4 count or previous AIDS at first vaccination, especially in those who never previously acquired SARS-CoV-2 and regardless of current CD4 count. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) have been suggested as persistent even with effective antiretroviral therapy (ART). Aims were to evaluate HAND prevalence and associated factors, in a large cohort of people-with-HIV (PWH). Methods ART-treated PWH, underwent a neuropsychological examination through a battery of 12 tests exploring 5 different domains, between 2009 and 2020, were included in this cross-sectional analysis. HAND were classified according to Frascati's criteria. Participants were defined as complaining or not-complaining if a cognitive complaint was reported or not. Chi-square for trend and multivariable logistic regression were fitted. Results Overall, 1424 PWH were enrolled during four three-years periods. HAND prevalence was 24%; among complainers (572/1424), it was 38%, higher than among not-complainers (15%). Over the study period, a decreasing HAND prevalence was found in the entire population (P < 0.001) and in complaining (P < 0.001); in not-complaining it remained stable (P = 0.182). Factors associated with HAND were older age, lower educational level, lower current CD4+ T-cell count and HCV co-infection. Compared to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, receiving dual and integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based therapies was associated with a decreased risk of HAND, as well as being tested in more recent years. Conclusions In this large cohort of ART-treated PWH, mostly virologically suppressed, a remarkable decreasing HAND prevalence was observed. Besides HIV- and patient-related factors, the reduced risk of HAND found with dual and INSTI-based regimens along with a more recent ART initiation, could suggest a potential role of new treatment strategies in this decline, due to their greater virologic efficacy and better tolerability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Most patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 display mild symptoms with good prognosis, while 20% of patients suffer from severe viral pneumonia and up to 5% may require intensive care unit (ICU) admission due to severe acute respiratory syndrome, which could be accompanied by multiorgan failure. Plasma proteomics provide valuable and unbiased information about disease progression and therapeutic candidates. Recent proteomic studies have identified molecular changes in plasma of COVID-19 patients that implied significant dysregulation of several aspects of the inflammatory response accompanied by a general metabolic suppression. However, which of these plasma alterations are associated with disease severity remains only partly characterized. A known limitation of proteomic studies of plasma samples is the large difference in the macromolecule abundance, with concentration spanning at least 10 orders of magnitude. To improve the coverage of plasma contents, we performed a deep proteomic analysis of plasma from 10 COVID-19 patients with severe/fatal pneumonia compared to 10 COVID-19 patients with pneumonia who did not require ICU admission (non-ICU). To this aim, plasma samples were first depleted of the most abundant proteins, trypsin digested and peptides subjected to a high pH reversed-phase peptide fractionation before LC–MS analysis. These results highlighted an increase of proteins involved in neutrophil and platelet activity and acute phase response, which is significantly higher in severe/fatal COVID-19 patients when compared to non-ICU ones. Importantly, these changes are associated with a selective induction of complement cascade factors in severe/fatal COVID-19 patients. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD036491. Among these alterations, we confirmed by ELISA that higher levels of the neutrophil granule proteins DEFA3 and LCN2 are present in COVID-19 patients requiring ICU admission when compared to non-ICU and healthy donors. Altogether, our study provided an in-depth view of plasma proteome changes that occur in COVID-19 patients in relation to disease severity, which can be helpful to identify therapeutic strategies to improve the disease outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim was to measure neutralizing antibody levels against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (BA.1) variant in serum samples obtained from vaccinated PLWH and healthcare workers (HCW) and compare them with those against the Wuhan-D614G (W-D614G) strain, before and after the third dose of a mRNA vaccine. We included 106 PLWH and 28 HCWs, for a total of 134 participants. Before the third dose, the proportion of participants with undetectable nAbsT against BA.1 was 88% in the PLWH low CD4 nadir group, 80% in the high nadir group and 100% in the HCW. Before the third dose, the proportion of participants with detectable nAbsT against BA.1 was 12% in the PLWH low nadir group, 20% in the high nadir group and 0% in HCW, respectively. After 2 weeks from the third dose, 89% of the PLWH in the low nadir group, 100% in the high nadir group and 96% of HCW elicited detectable nAbsT against BA.1. After the third dose, the mean log2 nAbsT against BA.1 in the HCW and PLWH with a high nadir group was lower than that seen against W-D614G (6.1 log2 (±1.8) vs. 7.9 (±1.1) and 6.4 (±1.3) vs. 8.6 (±0.8)), respectively. We found no evidence of a different level of nAbsT neutralization by BA.1 vs. W-D614G between PLWH with a high CD4 nadir and HCW (0.40 (−1.64, 2.43); p = 0.703). Interestingly, in PLWH with a low CD4 nadir, the mean log2 difference between nAbsT against BA.1 and W-D614G was smaller in those with current CD4 counts 201–500 vs. those with CD4 counts < 200 cells/mm3 (−0.80 (−1.52, −0.08); p = 0.029), suggesting that in this target population with a low CD4 nadir, current CD4 count might play a role in diversifying the level of SARS-CoV-2 neutralization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is conflicting evidence for how HIV influences COVID-19 infection. The aim of this study was to compare characteristics at presentation and the clinical outcomes of people living with HIV (PLWH) versus HIV-negative patients (non-PLWH) hospitalized with COVID-19. Methods: Primary endpoint: time until invasive ventilation/death. Secondary endpoints: time until ventilation/death, time until symptoms resolution. Results: A total of 1647 hospitalized patients were included (43 (2.6%) PLWH, 1604 non-PLWH). PLWH were younger (55 vs. 61 years) and less likely to be with PaO2/FiO2 < 300 mmHg compared with non-PLWH. Among PLWH, nadir of CD4 was 185 (75–322) cells/μL; CD4 at COVID-19 diagnosis was 272 cells/μL (127–468) and 77% of these were virologically suppressed. The cumulative probability of invasive mechanical ventilation/death at day 15 was 4.7% (95%CI 1.2–17.3) in PLWH versus 18.9% (16.9–21.1) in non-PLWH (p = 0.023). The cumulative probability of non-invasive/invasive ventilation/death at day 15 was 20.9% (11.5–36.4) in PLWH versus 37.6% (35.1–40.2) in non-PLWH (p = 0.044). The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of invasive mechanical ventilation/death of PLWH was 0.49 (95% CI 0.12–1.96, p = 0.310) versus non-PLWH; similarly, aHR of non-invasive/invasive ventilation/death of PLWH was 1.03 (95% CI 0.53–2.00, p = 0.926). Conclusion: A less-severe presentation of COVID-19 at hospitalization was observed in PLWH compared to non-PLWH; no difference in clinical outcomes could be detected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]