Search

Objective: Our objective was to evaluate the association of serum biomarkers with baseline psoriatic arthritis (PsA) disease activity, pharmacodynamic effects of deucravacitinib on biomarker levels, and the relationship between biomarkers and clinical responses to deucravacitinib. Methods: The phase 2 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03881059) randomly assigned 203 patients with PsA 1:1:1 to placebo, deucravacitinib at 6 mg once daily (QD), or deucravacitinib at 12 mg QD. Serum biomarkers associated with the interleukin 23 (IL‐23) pathway (IL‐17A, β‐defensin [BD‐2], and IL‐19), type I interferon pathway, inflammation, and collagen matrix turnover were measured by immunoassay. Clinical responses (≥75% improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI75] and ≥20% improvement from baseline in American College of Rheumatology criteria [ACR20] responses) were measured at week 16. Hematologic variables were also assessed. Results: IL‐17A, BD‐2, and IL‐19 had a modest association with PASI scores (r = 0.4, r = 0.56, and r = 0.5, respectively) at baseline. In deucravacitinib groups, IL‐17A, BD‐2, IL‐19, C‐X‐C motif ligand 9 (CXCL9), CXCL10, C‐reactive protein, matrix metalloproteinase 3, and collagen type 4 degradation marker levels were significantly reduced at week 16 versus baseline (P < 0.01); higher levels of IL‐23 pathway–associated biomarkers predicted higher PASI75 and ACR20 response rates in deucravacitinib‐treated patients. Significantly higher PASI75 response rates were seen in patients with high baseline IL‐17A (odds ratio 15.76) and BD‐2 levels (odds ratio 15.41) versus low baseline IL‐17A and BD‐2 levels. Changes in hematologic variables that are characteristic of JAK inhibition were not observed with deucravacitinib. Conclusion: Deucravacitinib significantly impacted biomarkers associated with Tyk2 signaling pathways of key inflammatory cytokines, including IL‐23 and type I interferon, and those related to collagen matrix turnover. These biomarkers may predict treatment responses to deucravacitinib. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To understand the relative efficacy and safety of bimekizumab, a selective inhibitor of IL-17F in addition to IL-17A, vs other biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) for PsA using network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods A systematic literature review (most recent update conducted on 1 January 2023) identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of b/tsDMARDs in PsA. Bayesian NMAs were conducted for efficacy outcomes at Weeks 12–24 for b/tsDMARD-naïve and TNF inhibitor (TNFi)-experienced patients. Safety at Weeks 12–24 was analysed in a mixed population. Odds ratios (ORs) and differences of mean change with the associated 95% credible interval (CrI) were calculated for the best-fitting models, and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values were calculated to determine relative rank. Results The NMA included 41 RCTs for 22 b/tsDMARDs. For minimal disease activity (MDA), bimekizumab ranked 1st in b/tsDMARD-naïve patients and 2nd in TNFi-experienced patients. In b/tsDMARD-naïve patients, bimekizumab ranked 6th, 5th and 3rd for ACR response ACR20/50/70, respectively. In TNFi-experienced patients, bimekizumab ranked 1st, 2nd and 1st for ACR20/50/70, respectively. For Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90/100, bimekizumab ranked 2nd and 1st in b/tsDMARD-naïve patients, respectively, and 1st and 2nd in TNFi-experienced patients, respectively. Bimekizumab was comparable to b/tsDMARDs for serious adverse events. Conclusion Bimekizumab ranked favourably among b/tsDMARDs for efficacy on joint, skin and MDA outcomes, and showed comparable safety, suggesting it may be a beneficial treatment option for patients with PsA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Guselkumab previously showed greater improvements versus placebo in axial symptoms in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) (assessed by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score [ASDAS]), in post hoc analyses of the phase 3, placebo-controlled, randomized DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2 studies. We now evaluate durability of response in axial-related outcomes through 2 years of DISCOVER-2. Methods: DISCOVER-2 biologic-naive adults with active PsA (≥ 5 tender/ ≥ 5 swollen joints, C-reactive protein ≥ 0.6 mg/dl) were randomized to guselkumab 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) or at week 0, week 4, then Q8W, or placebo → guselkumab Q4W at week 24. Among patients with imaging-confirmed sacroiliitis (investigator-identified), axial symptoms were assessed through 2 years utilizing BASDAI, BASDAI Question #2 (spinal pain), modified BASDAI (mBASDAI; excludes Question #3 [peripheral joint pain]), and ASDAS. Mean changes in scores and proportions of patients achieving ≥ 50% improvement in BASDAI (BASDAI 50) and ASDAS responses, including major improvement (decrease ≥ 2.0), were determined through week 100. Treatment failure rules (through week 24) and nonresponder imputation of missing data (post-week 24) were utilized. Mean BASDAI component scores were assessed through week 100 (observed data). Exploratory analyses evaluated efficacy by sex and HLA-B*27 status. Results: Among 246 patients with PsA and imaging-confirmed sacroiliitis, guselkumab-treated patients had greater mean improvements in BASDAI, mBASDAI, spinal pain, and ASDAS scores, lower mean BASDAI component scores, and greater response rates in achieving BASDAI 50 and ASDAS major improvement vs. placebo at week 24. Differences from placebo were observed for guselkumab-treated patients in selected endpoints regardless of sex or HLA-B*27 status. At week 100, mean improvements were ~ 3 points for all BASDAI scores and 1.6–1.7 for ASDAS; 49–54% achieved BASDAI 50 and 39% achieved ASDAS major improvement at week 100. Conclusions: Guselkumab treatment provided durable and meaningful improvements in axial symptoms and disease activity in substantial proportions of patients with active PsA and imaging-confirmed sacroiliitis. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03158285. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This study evaluated the efficacy of the interleukin-17A inhibitor secukinumab in patients with oligoarticular psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods: A total of 84 patients with oligoarticular PsA, defined as 1–4 tender joints and 1–4 swollen joints, were pooled from the FUTURE 2–5 and MAXIMISE trials (NCT01752634, NCT01989468, NCT02294227, NCT02404350, and NCT02721966). Patients were grouped by treatment received at week 12 (secukinumab 300 mg, secukinumab 150 mg, or placebo) and week 52 (any secukinumab 300 mg or any secukinumab 150 mg). Efficacy was assessed by the proportion of patients achieving selected clinical outcomes. The predictors of Disease Activity index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) responses at weeks 12 and 52 were identified by logistic regression analysis. Results: Secukinumab treatment resulted in greater achievement of DAPSA-based low disease activity (LDA), DAPSA-based remission (REM), DAPSA50, and DAPSA75 than placebo at week 12, with improvements sustained or further increased through week 52. LDA or REM was achieved at week 52 by more than 90% of patients who received either secukinumab dose, although secukinumab 300 mg resulted in the highest achievement of the stringent DAPSA75 and DAPSA REM outcomes. At week 12, younger age was associated with DAPSA LDA or REM and DAPSA50, while lower baseline swollen joint count was associated with DAPSA REM. No predictors were identified at week 52. The safety profile was consistent with the full study populations. Conclusion: Secukinumab demonstrated efficacy vs placebo across several outcome measures in patients with oligoarticular PsA at week 12, with sustained or improved responses through week 52. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Axial involvement constitutes a specific domain of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitors have demonstrated improvement in axial PsA (axPsA) symptoms, but have not shown efficacy in treating ankylosing spondylitis (AS), suggesting differences in axPsA processes and treatments. In a post hoc, pooled analysis of patients with investigator- and imaging-confirmed sacroiliitis in two phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled studies (DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2), patients treated with guselkumab, an IL-23p19 inhibitor, had greater axial symptom improvements compared with placebo. Confirmatory imaging at baseline was restricted to the sacroiliac (SI) joints, occurred prior to/at screening, and was locally read.Methods: The STAR study will prospectively assess efficacy outcomes in PsA patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-confirmed axial inflammation. Eligible, biologic-naïve patients with PsA (N =  405) for ≥ 6 months and active disease (≥ 3 swollen and ≥ 3 tender joints, C-reactive protein [CRP] ≥ 0.3 mg/dL) despite prior non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, apremilast, and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs will be randomized (1:1:1) to guselkumab every 4 weeks (Q4W); guselkumab at week (W) 0, W4, then every 8 weeks (Q8W); or placebo with crossover to guselkumab at W24, W28, then Q8W. Patients will have Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score ≥ 4, spinal pain component score (0-10 visual analog scale) ≥ 4, and screening MRI-confirmed axial involvement (positive spine and/or SI joints according to centrally read Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] score ≥ 3 in ≥ 1 region). The primary endpoint is mean change from baseline in BASDAI at W24; multiplicity controlled secondary endpoints at W24 include AS Disease Activity Score employing CRP (ASDAS), Disease Activity Index for PsA (DAPSA), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Investigator's Global Assessment of skin disease (IGA), and mean changes from baseline in MRI SI joint SPARCC scores. Centrally read MRIs of spine and SI joints (scored using SPARCC) will be obtained at W0, W24, and W52, with readers blinded to treatment group and timepoint. Treatment group comparisons will be performed using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel or chi-square test for binary endpoints and analysis of covariance, mixed model for repeated measures, or constrained longitudinal data analysis for continuous endpoints.Discussion: This study will evaluate the ability of guselkumab to reduce both axial symptoms and inflammation in patients with active PsA.Trial Registration: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04929210 , on 18 June 2021.Protocol Version: Version 1.0 dated 14 April 2021. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: PALACE 1, 2, and 3 were phase 3 studies aimed to evaluate apremilast efficacy and safety in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) despite prior treatment with conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and/or biologics. The pooled analysis reported here further characterized the clinical outcomes associated with long-term apremilast exposure in patients failing to achieve ≥ 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR20) at Week 104. Methods: Patients randomized to apremilast 30 mg twice daily at baseline and classified as ACR20 non-responders (ACR20NRs) or ACR20 responders (ACR20Rs) at Week 104 were included. Efficacy outcomes included change from baseline to Week 104 in ACR core components and other endpoints. Results: At Week 104, a total of 109 patients were ACR20NRs and 193 were ACR20Rs. As expected, the ACR20R group had improvements in all indices assessed. The ACR20NR group demonstrated substantial mean improvements from baseline in swollen joint count (SJC; − 58%), tender joint count (TJC; − 42%), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA; − 44%); resolution of enthesitis (34%) and dactylitis (68%); and achievement of ≥ 75% reduction from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index scores (among patients with psoriasis involving ≥ 3% of the body surface area) (36%). Conclusion: Despite not fulfilling a formal ACR20 response at Week 104, ACR20NRs experienced sustained improvements in several PsA core domains, including SJC, TJC, enthesitis, dactylitis, and psoriasis, as well as the PhGA (visual analog scale) scores, with apremilast treatment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01172938, NCT01212757, and NCT01212770. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To estimate the level of medication adherence and barriers to adherence among systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Patients taking antimalarials, immunosuppressives, and/or steroids to treat SLE were included. Adherence was measured using the Medication Adherence Self Report Inventory (MASRI) and adherence rates < 80% were considered nonadherent while rates ≥ 80% sufficiently adherent. Pill counts were conducted in a proportion of participants. Barriers to adherence were identified using the Identification of Medication Adherence Barriers Questionnaire 30 (IMAB-Q 30). Associations between adherence and patient demographics and disease-specific characteristics were explored. A total of 94 patients were studied and 28 pill counts conducted. 10 patients were classified as nonadherent and 84 patients as sufficiently adherent. 46% of patients were taking steroids, 77.7% antimalarials, and 55.3% immunosuppressives. 88% of patients were taking ≥ 1 medication for non-SLE conditions. The mean medication adherence rate for the SLE patients was 90.7%. Important barriers to adherence reported by nonadherent patients were: concern about harmful side effects (50%), being easily distracted (50%), life getting in the way (50%), being unsure or disagreeing that their condition will worsen without medications (50%), and having personal reasons for not taking medications (50%). Non-adherent patients reported significantly more barriers than sufficiently adherent patients (p < 0.001). The adherence rate in our population was higher than expected, reaching 90%. Barriers to medication adherence were identified and should be addressed on a population and individualized basis to improve patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: In previous studies, atherosclerotic vascular events (AVEs) were shown to occur in ~10% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We undertook this study to investigate the annual occurrence and potential risk factors for AVEs in a multinational, multiethnic inception cohort of patients with SLE. Methods: A large 33‐center cohort of SLE patients was followed up yearly between 1999 and 2017. AVEs were attributed to atherosclerosis based on SLE being inactive at the time of the AVE as well as typical atherosclerotic changes observed on imaging or pathology reports and/or evidence of atherosclerosis elsewhere. Analyses included descriptive statistics, rate of AVEs per 1,000 patient‐years, and univariable and multivariable relative risk regression models. Results: Of the 1,848 patients enrolled in the cohort, 1,710 had ≥1 follow‐up visit after enrollment, for a total of 13,666 patient‐years. Of these 1,710 patients, 3.6% had ≥1 AVEs attributed to atherosclerosis, for an event rate of 4.6 per 1,000 patient‐years. In multivariable analyses, lower AVE rates were associated with antimalarial treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 0.54 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.32–0.91]), while higher AVE rates were associated with any prior vascular event (HR 4.00 [95% CI 1.55–10.30]) and a body mass index of >40 kg/m2 (HR 2.74 [95% CI 1.04–7.18]). A prior AVE increased the risk of subsequent AVEs (HR 5.42 [95% CI 3.17–9.27], P < 0.001). Conclusion: The prevalence of AVEs and the rate of AVE accrual demonstrated in the present study is much lower than that seen in previously published data. This may be related to better control of both the disease activity and classic risk factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We read with great interest the study by Chi Chiu Mok et al,[1] on the relationship between the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria (EULAR/ACR criteria) score and the development of organ damage in patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. The new 2019-EULAR/ACR classification criteria specific domains at diagnosis can predict damage accrual in 670 childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Patients who fulfilled the EULAR/ACR criteria (score >=10) on their last clinic visit (542 patients) were divided into 2 groups; group 1, with a score of >=20, and group 2, with a score of <20. [Extracted from the article]

Objective: To examine the efficacy of methotrexate monotherapy relative to etanercept monotherapy and the value of combining methotrexate and etanercept for the treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods: In this double‐blind study, 851 patients with PsA were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms, as follows: oral methotrexate (20 mg) plus subcutaneous placebo given weekly (n = 284), subcutaneous etanercept (50 mg) plus oral placebo given weekly (n = 284), or subcutaneous etanercept (50 mg) plus oral methotrexate (20 mg) given weekly (combination therapy; n = 283). The American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) response and Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) response at week 24 were the primary end point and key secondary end point, respectively. Other measures of inflammatory arthritis, radiographic progression, and nonarticular disease manifestations were also assessed. Results: Patients with PsA had a mean ± SD age of 48.4 ± 13.1 years, and the mean ± SD duration of PsA was 3.2 ± 6.3 years (median 0.6 years). ACR20 and MDA response rates at week 24 were significantly greater in patients who received etanercept monotherapy compared with those who received methotrexate monotherapy (ACR20, 60.9% versus 50.7% of patients [P = 0.029]; MDA, 35.9% versus 22.9% of patients [P = 0.005]), and both were significantly greater in the combination therapy group compared with the methotrexate monotherapy group at week 24 (ACR20, 65.0% versus 50.7% of patients [P = 0.005]; MDA, 35.7% versus 22.9% of patients [P = 0.005]). Other secondary outcomes (ACR50 and ACR70 response rates, proportions of patients achieving a Very Low Disease Activity score, and PsA disease activity scores) showed between‐group differences that were consistent with the primary and key secondary end point results. Furthermore, patients in both etanercept treatment arms showed less radiographic progression at week 48 compared with patients who received methotrexate monotherapy. Outcomes were similar in the combination therapy and etanercept monotherapy groups, except for some skin end points. No new safety signals were seen. Conclusion: Etanercept monotherapy and combination therapy with etanercept and methotrexate showed greater efficacy than methotrexate monotherapy in patients with PsA, according to the ACR and MDA response rates and extent of radiographic progression at follow‐up. Overall, combining methotrexate and etanercept did not improve the efficacy of etanercept. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To develop and validate a modification of SLEDAI-2K to accurately describe disease activity while accounting for glucocorticoid (GC) doses. Methods The first two phases focused on the development of the index. Phase 1: identification of scenarios of real patients seen prospectively in a longitudinal cohort. Phase 2: derivation of an equation that explains the association between SLEDAI-2K and GC doses using physician global assessment as the external construct. Phase 3: comparison of SLEDAI-2K and SLEDAI-2K GC (SLEDAI-2KG), using different cut-off points (4–7), in identifying responders in response to therapy. Results In phase 1, 150 scenarios with different organ involvement and a range of GC doses were identified. In phase 2, three rheumatologists ranked disease activity using physician global assessment. A quadratic linear regression model relating GC doses and SLEDAI-2K resulted in the following equation: SLEDAI-2KG score = SLEDAI-2K score + [0.32 × GC – 0.0031 × GC2]. The weighted score of different GC doses was derived. In phase 3, SLEDAI-2KG identified more responders in a total of 111 patients at 6 months (84 vs 93%) and at 12 months (76 vs 92%) compared with SLEDAI-2K. SLEDAI-2KG performances were superior to SLEDAI-2K with all cut-off points (5–7). Conclusion We developed a modification of SLEDAI-2K, SLEDAI-2KG, that describes disease activity while accounting for GC dose category. SLEDAI-2KG identifies more responders compared with SLEDAI-2K. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on peripheral spondyloarthritis. Spondyloarthritis is a group of related diseases which include ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, reactive arthritis, and arthritis of inflammatory bowel disease. The definition of peripheral spondyloarthritis is applied to patients with arthritis, enthesitis, or dactylitis.

Objectives Evaluate effects of long-term bimekizumab treatment on patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures, symptoms and the impact of PsA on patients. Methods Patients with active PsA were enrolled into BE ACTIVE, a 48-week randomised controlled trial (NCT02969525). After Week 48, patients could enter a 104-week open-label extension (NCT03347110), receiving bimekizumab 160 mg every four weeks. PRO measures assessed included arthritis pain visual analogue scale (VAS), PsA Impact of Disease (PsAID)-9, 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) and HAQ-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Results were analysed as mean (S.E.M.) changes from baseline (CfB) from Week 0 to the end of the open-label extension (3 years) and as percentage of patients reaching patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) for global impact (PsAID-9 total score ≤4) and normal function (HAQ-DI total score <0.5). Non-responder imputation was applied to missing binary outcomes. Results In 206 patients (mean age 49.3 years, 51.0% male), completion rate was high; 161 (78.2%) patients completed Week 152. Bimekizumab treatment was associated with long-term sustained improvements in pain [arthritis pain VAS CfB; Week 48: −29.9 (1.9); Week 152: −32.0 (1.9)] and fatigue [PsAID-9 fatigue CfB; −2.4 (0.2); −2.7 (0.2)]. High percentages of patients achieved acceptable symptom state (PsAID-9 PASS: 75.2%; 65.0%) and normalised function (HAQ-DI <0.5: 49.0%; 46.1%). Improvements in patient global assessment and SF-36 Physical Component Summary were also sustained. Conclusions Bimekizumab treatment was associated with long-term sustained improvements in pain and fatigue, reducing overall impact of PsA on patients. Physical function and quality of life improved up to 3 years. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov , NCT02969525, NCT03347110. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives. To test whether non-fasting and fasting triglyceride (TG) levels differ in individual patients and whether TG (non-fasting and fasting) levels predict coronary artery disease (CAD) in lupus patients.Methods. Using predefined criteria for a patient's inclusion in this study, we identified the first available set of non-fasting and fasting TG measurements on each individual lupus patient seen in the clinic since 1996. We dichotomized TG values as normal/abnormal and determined whether non-fasting and fasting TG levels differ in each individual patient. We determined whether TG levels (non-fasting and fasting) predict CAD in all consecutive lupus patients seen in the clinic since 1973 using time-dependent time-to-event analysis and stepwise reduction analysis.Results. Part 1: 514 patients were identified. The time between first non-fasting and fasting TG measurements available was 3.2 months. Examining dichotomized TG values as normal/abnormal, there was concordance between fasting and non-fasting TG in 92% of the visits. Non-fasting TG levels were 0.16 (0.75) higher than fasting TG levels (P < 0.001). Part 2: among 1289 patients, 638 had at least one elevated TG level and the length of follow-up from the first TG level recorded to CAD or last clinic visit was 8.82 years. One hundred and four patients developed CAD. TG (non-fasting and fasting) levels predicted CAD with a hazard ratio of 1.15 (95% CI 1.02, 1.29).Conclusions. Although non-fasting TG levels were statistically higher than the fasting TG levels, the clinical significance of this difference is uncertain. TG (non-fasting and fasting) levels can predict CAD in lupus patients. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Advances in immunotherapy have improved survival of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus who now face an increasing burden of chronic diseases including that of the kidney. As systemic inflammation is also thought to contribute directly to the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), we assessed this risk in patients with lupus, with and without a diagnosis of nephritis, and also identified modifiable risk factors. Accordingly, we enrolled 631 patients (predominantly Caucasian), of whom 504 were diagnosed with lupus within the first year and followed them an average of 11 years. Despite the presence of a chronic inflammatory disease, the rate of decline in renal function of 238 patients without nephritis was similar to that described for non-lupus patient cohorts. Progressive loss of kidney function developed exclusively in patients with lupus nephritis who had persistent proteinuria and dyslipidemia, although only six required dialysis or transplantation. The mortality rate was 16% with half of the deaths attributable to sepsis or cancer. Thus, despite the presence of a systemic inflammatory disease, the risk of progressive CKD in this lupus cohort was relatively low in the absence of nephritis. Hence, as in idiopathic glomerular disease, persistent proteinuria and dyslipidemia (modifiable risks) are the major factors for CKD progression in lupus patients with renal involvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Observational cohorts have emerged as important resources to study course and prognosis of chronic disease, and also facilitate phenotype definition for genetic studies. We describe the development and accomplishments of the PsA cohort at the University of Toronto as an example of an observational cohort that has allowed the description of disease manifestations, course and prognosis of PsA. We also describe the development of an international collaboration based on this cohort, which will further be used to study the incidence, prevalence and predictive factors for the development of PsA among patients with psoriasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although there is still some controversy about the existence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) as a specific form of inflammatory arthritis associated with psoriasis, epidemiological and clinical studies support the unique features of PsA. Because of lack of diagnostic or classification criteria, the disease has been thought of as uncommon. New classification criteria should facilitate case definition of PsA. Over the past several decades, it has become clear that the disease leads to serious disability and even increased mortality. Traditional medications have not been effective in preventing the progression of joint damage. New medications, including biologics, have emerged with potential to controlling the inflammation and arresting the progression of joint damage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on the evolution of new concepts in the treatment of inflammatory arthritis. it offers details of the study conducted by Laure Coates and colleagues, who completed the Tight Control in Psoriatic Arthritis (TICOPA) research as the first to test the concept of treat to target in psoriatic arthritis. The findings of the study suggest that the approach was appropriate and further studies are needed to determine the most appropriate therapeutic intervention.

The article discusses a study on the difference between systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) that occurred during childhood and those during adulthood. Patients were examined using SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI). It was found that children with SLE have more diseases than adults with SLE.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a destructive form of inflammatory arthritis that occurs in about one-third of patients with psoriasis. The pathogenesis of PsA includes genetic and immunological factors. A review of the currently available therapies reveals that traditional disease-modifying medications have provided only marginal relief from joint inflammation in patients with PsA, and have not been successful in controlling the disease and preventing joint damage. On the basis of current understanding of the pathogenesis of joint destruction in PsA, several new medications have been introduced, including anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents and agents that interfere with T-cell function. Most of these medications have been found to be effective in both psoriasis and PsA. Recent randomised controlled trials suggest that at least anti-TNF agents may help prevent progression of joint destruction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although there is still some controversy about the existence of psoriatic arthritis as a specific form of inflammatory arthritis associated with psoriasis, epidemiological, and clinical studies support the unique features of psoriatic arthritis. Because of lack of diagnostic or classification criteria, the disease has been thought of as uncommon. Over the past several decades, it has become clear that the disease leads to serious disability and even increased mortality. Traditional medications have not been effective in preventing the progression of joint damage. New medications, including biologics, have emerged with the potential to control the inflammation and arrest the progression of joint damage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives The objectives of this study were to investigate the incidence of demyelinating disease (DD) among SpA patients and to identify risk factors that predict DD in this patient population. Methods Axial SpA (axSpA) and PsA patients were identified from a longitudinal cohort database. Each group was analysed according to the presence or absence of DD. Incidence rates (IRs) of DD were obtained, with competing risk analysis. Cox regression analysis (with Fine and Gray's method) was used to evaluate predictors of DD development. Results Among 2260 patients with follow-up data, we identified 18 DD events, corresponding to an average IR of 31 per 100 000 persons per year for SpA. The IR of DD at 20 years was higher in axSpA than in PsA (1.30% vs 0.13%, P  = 0.01). The risk factors retained in the best predictive model for DD development included ever- (vs never-) smoking [hazard ratio (HR) 2.918, 95% CI 1.037–8.214, P  = 0.0426], axSpA (vs PsA) (HR 8.790, 95% CI 1.242–62.182, P  = 0.0294) and presence (vs absence) of IBD (HR 5.698, 95% CI 2.083–15.589, P  = 0.0007). History of TNF-α inhibitor therapy was not a predictor of DD. Conclusion The overall incidence of DD in this SpA cohort was low. Incident DD was higher in axSpA than in PsA. A diagnosis of axSpA, the presence of IBD, and ever-smoking predicted the development of DD. History of TNF-α inhibitor use was not found to be a predictor of DD in this cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Examines the link between anticardiolipin antibodies and the features of antiphospholipid syndrome in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Tests used to measure the anticardiolipin antibodies; Anticardiolipin antibody outcome; Clinical outcomes.

Peripheral blood B-cell subpopulations and B-cell numbers from 25 patients with uncomplicated psoriasis and 22 patients with psoriasis arthritis were compared with those of 24 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers and 11 patients with radiologically defined erosive osteoarthritis. The numbers of early and late rosettes were found to be reduced in patients with psoriasis, with and without arthritis, while the total T-cell population (measured by aminoethyithiouronium bromide-rosettes) was found to be normal. There was no difference in the number of B cells between psoriasis patients and controls. Dose-response studies of mitogen stimulation with phytohemagglutinin and concanavalin. A revealed generally higher proliferative responses in the psoriatic patients only at supraoptimal concentrations. The pokeweed mitogen response, however, was reduced in patients with cutaneous psoriasis and increased in patients with psoriatic arthritis. These studies further support the concept of an immunoogic imbalance in lymphocyte populations from patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antigen specific suppressor cell activity of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was investigated in 20 patients with psoriatic arthritis and 18 patients with uncomplicated psoriasis and compared to that of 27 age- and sex- matched healthy controls and 18 patients with osteoarthritis. Topical skin therapy and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications were allowed but patients who had taken disease suppressive, immunosuppressive, cytotoxic, and systemic steroid therapy were excluded. The results demonstrate reduced suppressor cell activity (SCA) in patients with psoriatic arthritis compared to normal controls (54.8% ± 4.9 vs 68.4 ± 2.8, p <0.005). Similarly, the response of patients with uncomplicated psoriasis was significantly lower than normal (50.1 ± 4.9 vs 67.3 ± 3.0% p < 0.005). Five of the 20 patients with psoriatic arthritis and 7 of the 18 patients with uncomplicated psoriasis demonstrated SCA of more than 2 SD below the normal mean. The SCA of patients with osteoarthritis was normal. The plaque forming cell (PFC) response of patients with psoriatic arthritis and uncomplicated psoriasis was not different from those of the normal controls or of patients with osteoarthritis. There was no correlation between impaired suppression and disease activity or therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tofacitinib and other new treatments approved for use in psoriatic arthritis have only recently been included in psoriatic arthritis treatment guidelines, and studies evaluating the relative efficacy of available therapies are important to inform treatment decisions by healthcare professionals. To perform a network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of tofacitinib, biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), and apremilast in patients with psoriatic arthritis naïve to tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapy (TNFi-naïve) or with an inadequate response (TNFi-IR). A systematic literature review used searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and The Cochrane Library on October 9, 2017. Randomized controlled trials including adult patients with psoriatic arthritis receiving treatment administered as monotherapy or with conventional synthetic DMARDs were selected. Efficacy outcomes included American College of Rheumatology 20 response, change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, ≥75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, and change from baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score and Leeds Enthesitis Index. Treatment effects were evaluated during placebo-controlled phases, using a binomial logit model for binary outcomes and a normal identify link model for other outcomes. Discontinuations due to adverse events and serious infection events were assessed as safety outcomes. The network meta-analysis included 24 published randomized controlled trials, of which 13 enrolled TNFi-naïve patients only, 3 enrolled TNFi-IR patients only, and 8 enrolled both TNFi-naïve and TNFi-IR patients. Placebo-controlled treatment durations ranged from 12 to 24 weeks. Indirect comparisons showed tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID to have similar efficacy compared with most bDMARDs and apremilast in improving joint symptoms (based on American College of Rheumatology 20 response), and with some bDMARDs in improving skin symptoms (based on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) (tofacitinib 10 mg BID only in TNFi-IR) in patients with psoriatic arthritis who were TNFi-naïve or TNFi-IR. Results also showed that, compared with placebo, the improvement in physical functioning (based on Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index) with tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID was similar to that observed with most bDMARDs and apremilast in TNFi-naïve patients, and similar to that observed with all bDMARDs with available data in the TNFi-IR population. Improvements in Dactylitis Severity Score and Leeds Enthesitis Index scores were comparable between treatments. Tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID were median-ranked 8 and 15, respectively, for discontinuation due to any adverse events, and 5 and 16, respectively, for a serious infection event out of a total of 20 treatments in the network (lower numbers are more favorable). Tofacitinib provides an additional treatment option for patients with psoriatic arthritis, both in patients naïve to TNFi and in those with TNFi-IR. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2020; 81:XXX–XXX) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory arthritis that may affect as many as 30% of patients with psoriasis (Ps). Genetic factors play an important role in the susceptibility to and the expression of PsA. The objective of this study was to identify whether haplotype sharing among affected sibling pairs of individuals with PsA is increased compared with unaffected sibling pairs. We collected 182 sibling pairs of probands affected with PsA. Extracted genomic DNA was amplified in polymerase chain reactions using locus specific primers homologous to nucleotide sequences for each of the HLA-A, -B, -C, -DR, and -DQ loci. Polymerase chain reaction amplicons were identified by reverse line blot assay using sequence-specific oligonucleotide probes. Evidence for excessive haplotype sharing was examined through Green and Woodrow''s test. Results indicate that of the 182 sibling pairs, 46 were affected by PsA, 48 by Ps, and 88 were unaffected. The sharing of 2, 1, and 0 haplotypes for the PsA affected sibling pairs was 14, 27, and 5, respectively (p = 0.04); whereas the haplotype sharing for the Ps affected sibling pairs was 12, 26, and 10, respectively (p = 0.38). In conclusion, the human leukocyte antigen region on chromosome 6p is implicated as one of the candidate regions in PsA. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

In this commentary, we review clinical data which helps inform individualized benefit–risk assessment for tofacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). ORAL Surveillance, a safety trial of patients ≥ 50 years of age with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and cardiovascular risk factors, found increased rates of safety outcomes (including major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE], malignancies excluding non-melanoma skin cancer, and venous thromboembolism) with tofacitinib versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). Post hoc analyses of ORAL Surveillance have identified subpopulations with different relative risk versus TNFi; higher risk with tofacitinib was confined to patients ≥ 65 years of age and/or long-time current/past smokers, and specifically for MACE, patients with a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). In patients without these risk factors, risk differences between tofacitinib and TNFi could not be detected. Given differences in demographics, pathophysiology, and comorbidities, we sought to examine whether the risk stratification observed in RA is also appropriate for PsA and AS. Data from the PsA tofacitinib development program show low absolute risk of safety outcomes in patients < 65 years of age and never smokers, and low MACE risk in patients with no history of ASCVD, consistent with results from ORAL Surveillance. No MACE, malignancies, or venous thromboembolism were reported in the tofacitinib AS development program. The mechanism of the ORAL Surveillance safety findings is unknown, and there are no similar prospective studies of sufficient size and duration. Accordingly, it is appropriate to use a precautionary approach and extrapolate differentiating risk factors identified from ORAL Surveillance (age ≥ 65 years, long-time current/past smoking, and history of ASCVD) to PsA and AS. We recommend an individualized approach to treatment decisions based on these readily identifiable risk factors, in line with updated labeling for Janus kinase inhibitors and international guidelines for the treatment of PsA and AS. Trial Registration: NCT02092467, NCT01262118, NCT01484561, NCT00147498, NCT00413660, NCT00550446, NCT00603512, NCT00687193, NCT01164579, NCT00976599, NCT01059864, NCT01359150, NCT02147587, NCT00960440, NCT00847613, NCT00814307, NCT00856544, NCT00853385, NCT01039688, NCT02281552, NCT02187055, NCT02831855, NCT00413699, NCT00661661, NCT01877668, NCT01882439, NCT01976364, NCT00678210, NCT01710046, NCT01241591, NCT01186744, NCT01276639, NCT01309737, NCT01163253, NCT01786668, NCT03502616. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the immunologic profile associated with disease flares in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to investigate the clinical significance of any differences observed between patients during and following a flare. Methods: Multiparameter flow cytometry was used to examine 47 immune populations within the peripheral blood of 16 healthy controls, 25 patients with clinically quiescent SLE, and 46 patients with SLE experiencing a flare at baseline and at 6‐ and 12‐month follow‐up visits. Unsupervised clustering was used to identify patients with similar immune profiles and to track changes over time. Parametric or nonparametric statistics were used when appropriate to assess the association of cellular phenotypes with clinical and laboratory parameters. Results: Five clusters of patients were identified that variably contained patients with active and quiescent SLE, and that had distinct clinical phenotypes. Patients characterized by increased T peripheral helper, activated B, and age‐associated B cells were the most likely to be flaring at baseline, as well as the most likely to remain active or flare over the subsequent year if they acquired or retained this phenotype at follow‐up. In contrast, patients who had increased T helper (Th) cells in the absence of B cell changes, or who had increased Th1 cells and innate immune populations, mostly developed quiescent SLE on follow‐up. A significant proportion of patients with SLE had depletion of many immune populations at flare and only showed increases in these populations post‐flare. Conclusion: Cellular phenotyping of patients with SLE reveals several distinct immunologic profiles that may help to stratify patients with regard to prognosis and treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The APPRAISE study was conducted to better understand the 12-month effectiveness, tolerability, and patient satisfaction with apremilast treatment for patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in real-world settings. Methods: APPRAISE (NCT03608657), a prospective, multicenter, observational study, enrolled adults with active PsA prescribed apremilast per routine care between July 2018 and March 2020. Patients were followed for 12 months with visits suggested every 4 months. The primary outcome measure was achievement of remission (REM) or low disease activity (LDA), defined as a Clinical Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA) score ≤ 13. Results: Of the 102 patients who enrolled, 45 (44.1%) discontinued the study by 12 months. Most patients (75.5%) had moderate or high disease activity, and 24.5% were in REM/LDA at baseline based on cDAPSA score. Achievement of cDAPSA REM/LDA was 63.7%, 67.2%, and 53.8% at months 4, 8, and 12, respectively. In those continuing in the study, significant improvements were seen in swollen and tender joint counts, pain visual analog scale, psoriasis body surface area, and complete dactylitis resolution. Enthesitis reduction was also observed. Improvements in treatment satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes, including Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index and the 36-item Short Form physical and mental component scores, were observed over 12 months. The proportion of patients achieving a Patient-Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) increased significantly from baseline at months 4, 8, and 12 (P < 0.001). Apremilast was well tolerated; the most frequent adverse events (AEs) leading to discontinuation were diarrhea (9/102 [8.8%]), nausea (4/102 [3.9%]), and migraine (4/102 [3.9%]). Conclusion: In this real-world study conducted in Canadian rheumatology clinics, apremilast demonstrated clinical effectiveness in patients with active PsA, along with patient satisfaction with treatment. Safety findings were consistent with previously reported clinical data. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03608657. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: To evaluate the effect of guselkumab on work productivity and nonwork daily activity impairment and general health status through 2 years in patients who were biologic-naïve with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in the phase 3 DISCOVER-2 clinical trial. Methods: Adult patients with PsA were randomized to subcutaneous injections of guselkumab 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); at weeks 0, 4, then every 8 weeks (Q8W); or placebo (through week 24 with crossover to guselkumab Q4W). Work productivity and nonwork daily activity impairment were assessed using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for PsA (WPAI-PsA) and patient-reported general health status using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index and EQ-Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS). Least-squares (LS) mean changes from baseline in WPAI-PsA domains and EQ-5D-5L/EQ-VAS were assessed through week 100. Changes in employment status were utilized to estimate potential indirect savings from improved work productivity. Results: Of 739 randomized patients, 738 had available baseline data for the analyses (Q4W 245; Q8W 248; placebo 245). At week 24, greater improvements in work productivity, nonwork daily activity, and EQ-5D-5L/EQ-VAS were observed in the Q4W and Q8W groups versus the placebo group. At week 100, LS mean reductions in work productivity impairment (− 23.8% to − 28.0%) and nonwork daily activity impairment (– 26.6% to − 29.2%) and improvements in EQ-5D-5L/EQ-VAS (0.14 to 0.15/21.2 to 25.0) were maintained in patients receiving guselkumab. Among patients employed at baseline, 12.1–16.4% were not employed at week 100, and 20.0–25.3% shifted from not employed at baseline to employed at week 100. Potential yearly indirect cost savings (USD) from improved work productivity at week 100 ranged from $16,529 to $19,409. Conclusion: Patients with active PsA treated with guselkumab demonstrated reduced impairment in work productivity and nonwork daily activity, together with improvement in general health status and substantial potential cost savings, over a 2-year period. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03158285. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The author reflects on the methotrexate as a first-line drug for psoriasis. It mentions a reference to the article published in the previous issue regarding the randomised controlled phase 3 trial to assess the effect of an intensified dosing schedule of subcutaneous methotrexate in patients with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis. It also mentions trials comparing methotrexate to biological therapies with infliximab, adalimumab and ustekinumab.

Background: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, heterogeneous, immune-mediated disease manifesting as a spectrum of possible inflammatory signs and symptoms. Clinicians need therapeutic choices that work across all active PsA disease domains, as well as practical information about efficacy of available treatments for individual domains in specific groups of patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) exposure on the efficacy of secukinumab across PsA core domains. Methods: Data were pooled from 2049 participants with PsA in four phase 3 studies (FUTURE 2–5). Efficacy at week 16 was evaluated for each GRAPPA-OMERACT PsA core domain using nonresponder imputation for musculoskeletal disease activity and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index scores or as-observed data for other outcomes. For each measure, comparisons with placebo were made separately in the TNFi-naive and TNFi-inadequate responder/intolerant (TNF-IR) cohorts. Results: Treatment with secukinumab improved PsA disease activity across all disease domains regardless of previous TNFi use, although TNFi-naive patients experienced numerically greater benefits in most outcomes. Among patients treated with secukinumab 300 mg, 41.5% and 24.4% of TNFi-naive patients (P < 0.05 vs placebo) and 18.6% and 9.0% of TNF-IR patients (nonsignificant vs placebo) experienced resolution in 66 swollen and 68 tender joint counts, respectively; additionally, 37.2% of TNFi-naive patients and 24.2% of TNF-IR patients achieved complete resolution of psoriasis at week 16 (all P < 0.05 vs placebo). Secukinumab effect sizes were generally larger in TNFi-naive vs TNF-IR patients for musculoskeletal and patient-reported domains. Conclusions: Secukinumab demonstrated efficacy vs placebo across GRAPPA-OMERACT PsA core domains. Higher responses among TNFi-naive vs TNF-IR patients suggest that secukinumab should be considered for first-line use in PsA. Plain Language Summary: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a long-term disease that can affect a patient's joints, skin, lower back, physical function, mental health, productivity, and other areas. Drugs called tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) can be used to treat PsA, although not all patients benefit from TNFis and many seek other treatment options. These patients, known as TNFi-inadequate responders (TNF-IR), have PsA that is difficult to treat. Another treatment option is secukinumab, a drug that blocks a molecule called interleukin-17 that is involved in PsA. Doctors need to know how different drugs work for treating PsA signs and symptoms in different groups of patients, including TNF-IR patients and those who have never received TNFis (TNFi-naive patients). This study used data from 2049 patients in four different PsA clinical trials (FUTURE 2–5) to see how well secukinumab worked at treating different signs and symptoms of PsA in TNFi-naive and TNF-IR patients. After 16 weeks of treatment, patients who took secukinumab saw greater improvements across all measured PsA signs and symptoms than those who took placebo. This was true for both TNFi-naive and TNF-IR patients. TNFi-naive patients seemed to benefit slightly more than TNF-IR patients—especially in their joint symptoms—although this study was not designed to judge the significance of these differences. These results suggest that secukinumab would be an effective first treatment option for patients with PsA. Since secukinumab improves the skin, joints, and other affected areas, it can be useful in treating the whole patient who has psoriatic disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. To address suboptimal cardiovascular risk prediction in patients with psoriatic disease (PsD), we developed and internally validated a five-year disease-specific cardiovascular risk prediction model. Methods. We analyzed data from a prospective cohort of participants with PsD without a history of cardiovascular events. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and PsD-related measures of disease activity were considered as potential predictors. The study outcome included nonfatal and fatal cardiovascular events. A base prediction model included 10 traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Eight PsD-related factors were assessed by adding them to the base model to create expanded models, which were controlled for PsD therapies. Variable selection was performed using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) penalized regression with 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using measures of discrimination and calibration and measures of sensitivity and specificity. Results. Between 1992 and 2020, 85 of 1,336 participants developed cardiovascular events. Discrimination of the base model (with traditional cardiovascular risk factors alone) was excellent, with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of 85.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 81.9–89.1). Optimal models did not select any of the tested disease-specific factors. In a sensitivity analysis, which excluded lipid lowering and antihypertensive treatments, the number of damaged joints was selected in the expanded model. However, this model did not improve risk discrimination compared to the base model (AUC 85.5, 95% CI 82.0–89.1). Conclusion. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors alone are effective in predicting cardiovascular risk in patients with PsD. A risk score based on these factors performed well, indicating excellent discrimination and calibration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in SLE have failed to reach their respective end points, with the rates of response to placebo (plus standard-of-care treatment) being unexpectedly high. The aim of this systematic review was to quantify the response to placebo in non-renal, non-neuropsychiatric lupus. Methods The PubMed database was searched (from 2000 to December 2019) for phase II/III RCTs assessing the efficacy and safety of biologics in non-renal, non-neuropsychiatric SLE. Data on the efficacy and safety of the placebo-treated patients were collected in a pre-established data retrieval form. Descriptive statistics were used. Results A total of 24 RCTs (n  = 11128 in total) were included. Placebo-treated patients (n  = 3899) were mostly females (93.5%), Caucasians (60.2%), of mean age 39.7 years, and having a mean disease duration of 7.4 years. Their mean initial SLEDAI 2000 was 10.4, whereas 60.5% had positive anti-dsDNA antibodies, 41.9% low C3 and 35.6% low C4 at randomization. Standard-of-care treatment included glucocorticosteroids in 85.9%, antimalarials in 72.8% and immunosuppressives in 48.5%. The response to placebo was 36.2% for the primary end point (as defined in each study), 39.8% for the SLE Responder Index-4 (SRI-4), 29.2% for SRI-5, 28.4% for SRI-6 and 30.9% for BILAG-based Combined Lupus Assessment response. Regarding safety, there were serious adverse events in 16.3% of patients, serious infections in 5.5% and malignancies in 0.3%, and death occurred in 0.56% of patients. Conclusion More than one-third of the placebo-treated patients achieved their respective primary end points in RCTs with biologics in non-renal, non-neuropsychiatric SLE. The response rate was higher for certain end points, such as the SRI-4, while it decreased with more stringent end points. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a complex inflammatory musculoskeletal and skin disease. The treatment of PsA has changed substantially over the past 10 years. Clinical practice guidelines are developed to help busy clinicians rapidly integrate evolving knowledge of therapeutic management into practice. In this review, we compare PsA treatment recommendations or guidelines developed by one national organization [ACR and National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) in 2018], one regional organization (EULAR in 2015), and one international organization (the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis in 2015). We examine the development of guidelines in PsA more broadly and examine similarities and differences in the three sets of recommendations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an immune‐mediated inflammatory arthritis, associated with psoriasis, that significantly increases morbidity and mortality risk. We currently lack the means of predicting which patients with psoriasis will develop PsA, and a large number of patients remain undiagnosed. Regulation of gene expression through DNA methylation can potentially trigger and maintain PsA pathophysiological processes. We aimed to identify DNA methylation markers that can predict which patients with psoriasis will develop PsA prior to the onset of musculoskeletal symptoms. Methods: Genome‐wide DNA methylation was assessed in blood samples from patients with psoriasis who went on to develop arthritis (converters) and patients with psoriasis who did not (biologic naive, matched for age, sex, psoriasis duration, and duration of follow‐up). Methylation differences between converters and nonconverters were identified by a multivariate linear regression model including clinical covariates (age, sex, body mass index, smoking). Predictive performance of methylation markers was assessed by developing support vector machine classification models with and without the addition of clinical variables. Results: We identified a set of 36 highly relevant methylation markers (false discovery rate: adjusted P < 0.05 and a minimum change in methylation of 0.05) across 15 genes and several intergenic regions. A classification model relying on these markers identified converters and nonconverters with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.9644. Conclusion: This study shows that DNA methylation patterns at an early stage of psoriatic disease can distinguish between patients who will develop PsA from those who will not during the same follow‐up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The goals of this study were to assess the associations of severe nonadherence to hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), objectively assessed by HCQ serum levels, and risks of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) flares, damage, and mortality rates over five years of follow‐up. Methods: The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) Inception Cohort is an international multicenter initiative (33 centers throughout 11 countries). The serum of patients prescribed HCQ for at least three months at enrollment were analyzed. Severe nonadherence was defined by a serum HCQ level <106 ng/mL or <53 ng/mL for HCQ doses of 400 or 200 mg/day, respectively. Associations with the risk of a flare (defined as a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 increase ≥4 points, initiation of prednisone or immunosuppressive drugs, or new renal involvement) were studied with logistic regression, and associations with damage (first SLICC/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index [SDI] increase ≥1 point) and mortality with separate Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Of the 1,849 cohort participants, 660 patients (88% women) were included. Median (interquartile range) serum HCQ was 388 ng/mL (244–566); 48 patients (7.3%) had severe HCQ nonadherence. No covariates were clearly associated with severe nonadherence, which was, however, independently associated with both flare (odds ratio 3.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.80–6.42) and an increase in the SDI within each of the first three years (hazard ratio [HR] 1.92 at three years; 95% CI 1.05–3.50). Eleven patients died within five years, including 3 with severe nonadherence (crude HR 5.41; 95% CI 1.43–20.39). Conclusion: Severe nonadherence was independently associated with the risks of an SLE flare in the following year, early damage, and five‐year mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses a study which investigated the association between obesity and increased risk of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The authors used Cox regression analysis and the study setting was dermatology clinics at the University of Utah School of Medicine. The setting of the study was dermatology clinics at the University of Utah School of Medicine and involved volunteer sample of patients with dermatologist-diagnosed psoriasis. Study findings suggested an association between obesity at age 18 years and increased risk of developing PsA.

The author comments on the linked randomised trial conducted by researchers W. Sterry and colleagues which compared the effectiveness of two different etanercept regimens in treating the skin manifestations of psoriasis in people with psoriatic arthritis for 12 weeks. He presents an overview of psoriatic arthritis and etanercept. He claims that the trial showed that the higher dose of etanercept had no additional benefit effect on treating arthritis. He also notes that the study showed the effectiveness of etanercept for treating psoriatic arthritis.

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors are an effective treatment for psoriatic arthritis, but no single agent is effective in all patients. Novel therapies that target other cytokines have now been tested, with encouraging results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A letter to the editor in response to an editorial on the diagnosis of patients with psoriatic arthritis in the previous issue is presented.

In a recent meta-analysis of the risks and benefits of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TN F) therapies in patients with psoriatic arthritis, Saad et al. found that adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab were all significantly more effective than placebo for all outcome measures analyzed. There were no differences between these anti-TNF inhibitors in achieving the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20) response for joint disease. A difference in the efficacy of the anti-TNF agents for treatment of skin manifestations was reported; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance. Analysis of other disease manifestations would have been interesting, as there is a clinical perception of a better response to treatment with anti-TNF antibodies (i.e. adalimumab and infliximab) versus the TNF receptor (i.e. etanercept). When comparing the anti-TNF agents with placebo in terms of safety, the only significant difference was an increased incidence of injection-site reactions associated with etanercept therapy. As all three drugs were shown to be equally effective in the management of psoriatic arthritis, patients should be allowed to make treatment choices based on whether they prefer the flexibility of self injection or whether they find repeated injections unacceptable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Genetics plays an important role in SLE risk, as well as osteonecrosis (ON), a significant and often debilitating complication of SLE. We aimed to identify genetic risk loci for ON in people with childhood-onset (cSLE) and adult-onset (aSLE) SLE. Methods We enrolled participants from two tertiary care centres who met classification criteria for SLE. Participants had prospectively collected clinical data and were genotyped on a multiethnic array. Un-genotyped single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were imputed, and ancestry was inferred using principal components (PCs). Our outcome was symptomatic ON confirmed by imaging. We completed time-to-ON and logistic regression of ON genome-wide association studies (GWASs) with covariates for sex, age of SLE diagnosis, five PCs for ancestry, corticosteroid use and selected SLE manifestations. We conducted separate analyses for cSLE and aSLE and meta-analysed results using inverse-variance weighting. Genome-wide significance was P  < 5 × 10−8. Results The study included 940 participants with SLE, 87% female and 56% with cSLE. ON was present in 7.6% (n  = 71). Median age of SLE diagnosis was 16.9 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 13.5, 29.3), with median follow-up of 8.0 years (IQR: 4.2, 15.7). Meta-GWAS of cSLE and aSLE time-to-ON of 4 431 911 SNPs identified a significant Chr.2 SNP, rs34118383 (minor allele frequency = 0.18), intronic to WIPF1 (hazard ratio = 3.2 [95% CI: 2.2, 4.8]; P  = 1.0 × 10−8). Conclusion We identified an intronic WIPF1 variant associated with a 3.2 times increased hazard for ON (95% CI: 2.2, 4.8; P   =  1.0 × 10−8) during SLE follow-up, independent of corticosteroid exposure. The effect of the SNP on time-to-ON was similar in cSLE and aSLE. This novel discovery represents a potential ON risk locus. Our results warrant replication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Methods Results Conclusions A simple, scalable tool that identifies psoriasis patients at high risk for developing psoriatic arthritis (PsA) could improve early diagnosis. We aimed to develop a risk prediction model for the development of PsA and to assess its performance among patients with psoriasis.We analyzed data from a prospective cohort of psoriasis patients without PsA at enrollment. Participants were assessed annually by a rheumatologist for the development of PsA. Information about their demographics, psoriasis characteristics, comorbidities, medications, and musculoskeletal symptoms was used to develop prediction models for PsA. Penalized binary regression models were used for variable selection while adjusting for psoriasis duration. Risks of developing PsA over 1‐ and 5‐year time periods were estimated. Model performance was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) and calibration plots.Among 635 psoriasis patients, 51 and 71 developed PsA during the 1‐year and 5‐year follow‐up periods, respectively. The risk of developing PsA within 1 year was associated with younger age, male sex, family history of psoriasis, back stiffness, nail pitting, joint stiffness, use of biologic medications, patient global health, and pain severity (AUC 72.3). The risk of developing PsA within 5 years was associated with morning stiffness, psoriatic nail lesion, psoriasis severity, fatigue, pain, and use of systemic nonbiologic medication or phototherapy (AUC 74.9). Calibration plots showed reasonable agreement between predicted and observed probabilities.The development of PsA within clinically meaningful time frames can be predicted with reasonable accuracy for psoriasis patients using readily available clinical variables. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the epidemiology, clinical features and pathophysical characteristics of psoriasis arthritis, the most prevalent coexisting condition of the skin disease psoriasis. Psoriasis arthritis has shared genetic and clinical features with other forms of spondyloarthritis disorders which can begin during childhood. The clinical subtypes of the disease including oligoarticular psoriatic arthritis, polyarticular and arthritis mutilans are mentioned.

Psoriasis is an inflammatory disease of the skin that is sometimes accompanied by an auto-inflammatory arthritis called psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Psoriasis and PsA are multifactorial diseases that result from complex interactions of environmental and genetic risk factors. Epigenetic marks, which are labile chemical marks with diverse functions, form a layer of biological information that sits at the interface of genetics and the environment. Aberrant epigenetic regulation has been previously implicated in other rheumatological disorders. The purpose of this review is to summarize and critically evaluate the nascent literature on epigenetics in psoriasis and PsA. A systematic review yielded 52 primary articles after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted using a standardized template and study quality assessed using a methodological quality checklist. Studies reflect a broad range of epigenetic sub-disciplines, the most common being DNA methylation, followed by the parent of origin effect or genomic imprinting, expression or activity of epigenetic modifying enzymes, and histone modifications. Epidemiological studies demonstrating excessive paternal transmission provided the earliest evidence of epigenetic deregulation in psoriatic disease, however few studies have examined its molecular mechanisms. Methylation studies evolved rapidly from low resolution global to targeted analyses of known psoriatic disease susceptibility loci such as HLA-C*0602 . The recent explosion of epigenome-wide association studies has provided us with novel insights into psoriasis pathogenesis, and the mechanism of action of UVB, methotrexate, and anti-TNF therapies, as well as molecular signatures of psoriasis that may have clinical relevance. Finally, recent studies of pharmacological inhibitors of epigenetic modifier enzymes demonstrate their potential applicability as novel treatment modalities for psoriasis. Challenges of epigenetics research in psoriasis and PsA were identified and future perspectives are discussed herein. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bimekizumab is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-17F and IL-17A. This study compared the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab with placebo over 16 weeks in patients with active psoriatic arthritis and previous inadequate response or intolerance to tumour necrosis factor-α (TNFα) inhibitors. BE COMPLETE was a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted across 92 sites (including hospitals, clinics, and research centres) in 11 countries (Australia, Canada, Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Poland, Russia, the UK, and the USA). Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with adult-onset psoriatic arthritis (meeting the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis for at least 6 months before screening) with a history of inadequate response or intolerance to treatment with one or two TNFα inhibitors for either psoriatic arthritis or psoriasis. We stratified patients with active psoriatic arthritis by region and previous TNFα inhibitor use. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive subcutaneous bimekizumab 160 mg every 4 weeks or placebo by an interactive-voice and web-response system on the basis of a predetermined randomisation schedule. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with 50% or greater improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR50) at week 16 (non-responder imputation). Efficacy analyses were done in the randomised population. The safety analysis set comprised patients who received one or more doses of study treatment. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03896581 , and is completed. Between March 28, 2019, and Feb 14, 2022, 556 patients were screened and 400 patients were randomly assigned to bimekizumab 160 mg every 4 weeks (n=267) or placebo (n=133). The primary and all hierarchical secondary endpoints were met at week 16. 116 (43%) of 267 patients receiving bimekizumab reached ACR50, compared with nine (7%) of 133 patients receiving placebo (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 11·1 [95% CI 5·4–23·0], p<0·0001). 121 (69%) of 176 patients with psoriasis affecting at least 3% body surface area at baseline who received bimekizumab reached 90% or greater improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI90), compared with six (7%) of 88 patients who received placebo (adjusted OR 30·2 [12·4–73·9], p<0·0001). Treatment-emergent adverse events up to week 16 were reported in 108 (40%) of 267 patients receiving bimekizumab and 44 (33%) of 132 patients receiving placebo. There were no new safety signals and no deaths. Bimekizumab treatment led to superior improvements in joint and skin efficacy outcomes at week 16 compared with placebo in patients with psoriatic arthritis and inadequate response or intolerance to TNFα inhibitors. The safety profile of bimekizumab was consistent with previous phase 3 studies in patients with plaque psoriasis, and studies of IL-17A inhibitors. UCB Pharma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]