Search

In seismic hazard assessment, subsurface geophysical surveying has gained popularity in recent years towards fault mapping and determining seismic deformation parameters such as fault offset, recurrence, and depth of fault, locating proper trench sites based on the subsurface information. In the present study, electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) was used to (1) locate the trace of the southern segment of the Ulsan fault, (2) to test the applicability of ERT techniques for active fault mapping in a close to the highly urbanized and complex geological environment with a slow tectonic activity. We have applied the ERT technique at five sites. At one place, we used the Wenner array, Schlumberger array, Dipole-Dipole array, and Seismic-profiling techniques to know which method provides a better result in complex geological conditions like Korea. Out of these methods, the Dipole-Dipole array provided high-resolution results and was used for the other two sites. The ERT result shows high and low resistivity zones interpreted as bedrock (mainly Tertiary and Cretaceous formations) and coarse fluvial sediment layer, respectively. The maximum vertical displacement recorded along the fault varies from 6 m to 12 m. Based on the ERT results, two trenches were excavated to directly investigate the deformation pattern associated with the southern segment of the Ulsan fault. The ERT and trench survey results support that the southern Ulsan fault has slipped multiple times since Quaternary. Using this multi-approach, ~5 km long active fault map was prepared for the southern Ulsan Fault. It is found from this study that the integrated approach is highly beneficial where contrasting sub-lithological units exist in terms of their physical properties, even though human activity or the ongoing urbanization process has modified the surface morphology. This study argues for judicious use of ERT techniques to delineate the shallow subsurface geology across various active faults in the Korean peninsula and similar tectonic settings. • Different Geophysical techniques were applied to trace the southern Ulsan fault which pass through the highly urbanized area. • Dipole-Dipole technique was useful to locate the fault and finding the trench sites. • Paleoseismic investigations suggests that the southern Ulsan fault shows evidences of Holocene earthquakes. • 5 km active fault map were prepared using ERT, Paleoseismic evidences. • The detailed fault map can be used for the seismic hazard estimation for the nearby urban area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The macroseismic intensity of the February 6, 2018, Mw 6.4, Hualien earthquake, which caused extensive damage around the Hualien area of eastern Taiwan is reassessed using the Environmental Seismic Intensity (ESI-07) scale. We compiled data on earthquake environmental effects (EEEs) caused by the 2018 Hualien earthquake, which includes surface ruptures, ground cracks, liquefaction, and occasional landslides, and estimated the epicentral intensity (I 0) as well as site-specific intensities. We found that the ESI-07 epicentral intensity of the Hualien quake in 2018 is IX. We note that the epicentral area of the 2018 Hualien earthquake was the mesoseismal area of the October 22, 1951, (M w 6.6) Hualien earthquake, as reported in primary contemporary sources and historical earthquake catalogs. The 1951 Hualien earthquakes also caused prominent surface ruptures, liquefaction, and ground cracks. Consequently, we reassess the macroseismic intensities of this historical seismic event and compare it to the Hualien earthquake in 2018. The comparison suggests similar epicentral intensities for the two earthquakes (IX and X ESI-07). Moreover, we conducted a systematic comparison between intensity obtained using different scales which revealed the differences of two to three degrees between the ESI-07 and traditional intensity scales. This result reconfirms the significance of documentation and recording of earthquake environmental effects to make intensity assessments for modern seismic events consistent with the historical earthquake records. Moreover, a re-evaluation of historical earthquake intensity in eastern Taiwan could be performed in order to update the seismic hazard map. Application of the ESI-07 intensity scale of recent and historical earthquakes will be helpful in post-earthquake recovery efforts for a future earthquake. The prepared ShakeMaps from the ESI-07 values suggests completely different shapes to the previously generated ShakeMaps considering the peak ground acceleration or peak ground velocity. It suggests that the ShakeMaps prepared from the earthquake environmental effects can be complemented with the instrumental based intensity map to have a better seismic hazard prediction and future land use planning for the region. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

On 26th January 2001, an earthquake of magnitude Mw 7.7 occurred near Bhuj, in northwestern India, resulting in severe environmental effects. No unequivocal primary surface rupture was observed for the earthquake, but it caused widespread liquefaction and lateral spreading in the Rann of Kachchh and Little Rann. After the earthquake, several researchers collected field evidence of secondary surface rupture, rockfall, dry craters, and surface manifestations of liquefaction, including the formation of mud volcanoes and lateral spreads, in the meizoseismal area. Analysis of pre- and post-earthquake satellite images suggests that several "dry" streams in the Rann of Kachchh began to flow due to extensive liquefaction induced by the earthquake. In this present study, the macroseismic intensity of the Bhuj earthquake is evaluated by considering these environmental effects and applying the ESI-07 intensity scale to the affected area. As an outcome, the epicentral intensity of the 2001 Bhuj earthquake was determined to be XI. According to historical records and seismic catalogs, 16th June 1819 Allah Bund earthquake caused prominent surface rupture which was not so clear in the case of 2001 Bhuj earthquake, but the secondary effects were similar for both earthquakes. Considering the environmental effects caused by the 1819 Allah Bund earthquake, an intensity of XI was estimated for the epicentral area. For both earthquakes, the ESI scale yields a significant difference of one to two degrees with the traditional intensity scales. The 2001 Bhuj earthquake and 1819 Allah Bund earthquake shows similar ESI-07 intensity of XI despite of different epicentral locations. This implies the reliability of ESI-07 scale application for different earthquakes of similar dimensions in the same geological setting. This study contributes to the application of ESI-07 scale for Indian earthquakes, especially reverse faulting events, and to the future improvement of the ESI scale with emphasis on its applicability to historical earthquakes on the Indian subcontinent. Also, this study may help in future land use planning in the meizoseismal area of 1919 Allah Bund and 2001 Bhuj earthquakes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The 28th September 2018 Sulawesi Supershear earthquake (M W 7.5) was one of the deadliest earthquakes in the recent history of Indonesia causing ∼4000 causalities. The earthquake caused a ∼ 177 km long surface rupture along the Palu-Karo fault. Apart from surface rupture, the earthquake caused extensive earthquake environmental effects (EEEs) around the Palu-Donggala area of Central Sulawesi, Indonesia, which includes tsunami, coastal landslide, liquefaction, ground cracks and more than 7300 landslides in hilly areas. Initial post-event analysis and reports assigned a Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) of VII to VIII in Palu City and the surrounding area. Building damage and ground effects caused by the earthquake suggested that seismic intensity was understated. Here we applied the EEEs information from field survey data, published reports, and remote sensing tools to determine macroseismic intensity using the Environmental Seismic Intensity (ESI-07) Scale. The ESI-07 intensity derived from the ground effects suggests the maximum intensity of X-XI, which is 3–4° higher than the traditional intensity estimated by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) and the Indonesian Agency for Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysics (BMKG). ShakeMaps were generated considering the ESI-07 values. The ShakeMap was compared with the instrumentally derived ShakeMap for the Palu earthquake, which proves that the ShakeMap prepared from the instrumental data or structural damage data is underrated. We argue that proper documentation of the EEEs is necessary for such damaging earthquakes for future earthquake hazard mapping and planning in the study area and other earthquakes in Indonesia. In addition, this will help in defining the on-fault and off-fault damage zone towards reducing the seismic risk of the Palu Donggala area. • Detailed Earthquake Environmental Effects (EEEs) caused by the 28/09/2018 Sulawesi earthquake (M w 7.5) were collected. • The epicentral ESI-07 intensity as well as the site specific intensity were estimated. • The ESI-07 intensity were compared with Skala Intensitas Gempabhumi (SIG), BMKG. • ESI-07 ShakeMap were generated using the Surface Rupture data and ESI-07 values. • The maps can be used to guide efficient and strategic seismic hazard assessment and land use planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]