Search

With the emphasis on laparoscopic skills training outside of the operating room (OR), simulators are constantly being developed and improved. Virtual reality (VR) trainers have been looking for solutions to compensate their lack of haptic feedback. A possible solution is the addition of kinematic interaction between laparoscopic instruments and objects. The aim of the study was to determine whether this interaction can replace haptic feedback that is naturally present in box trainers. Novices (n == 50) were randomly assigned to training in a conventional VR setup (VR-I), a VR environment with additional kinematic interaction (VR-II), a box trainer equivalent of these setups (Box-I or Box-II), or to a control group. An identical cylinder task was performed in all four training setups. The effect was established by comparing the performance before and after training during a tissue handling task, using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. The controls did not improve significantly. The VR-I group improved in time, whereas VR-II and both box trainer groups improved in time, path length and motion in depth. With respect to haptic feedback, box training models are superior to VR systems. However, additional kinematic interaction between instruments and objects can be a promising surrogate for haptic feedback in VR systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: It is frequently suggested that minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is harder to acquire than conventional surgery. To test this hypothesis, residents' learning curves of both surgical skills are compared. Methods: Residents had to be assessed using a general global rating scale of the OSATS (Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills) for every procedure they performed as primary surgeon during a 3-month clinical rotation in gynecological surgery. Results: Nine postgraduate-year-4 residents collected a total of 319 OSATS during the 2 years and 3 months investigation period. These assessments concerned 129 MIS (laparoscopic and hysteroscopic) and 190 conventional (open abdominal and vaginal) procedures. Learning curves (in this study defined as OSATS score plotted against procedure-specific caseload) for MIS and conventional surgery were compared using a linear mixed model. The MIS curve revealed to be steeper than the conventional curve (1.77 vs. 0.75 OSATS points per assessed procedure; 95% CI 1.19-2.35 vs. 0.15-1.35, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Basic MIS procedures do not seem harder to acquire during residency than conventional surgical procedures. This may have resulted from the incorporation of structured MIS training programs in residency. Hopefully, this will lead to a more successful implementation of the advanced MIS procedures. Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Concerns about the achievement of surgical proficiency during residency are increasing. To objectify surgical skills, the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) was developed and proven valid, feasible and reliable for use in laboratory settings. This study aimed to evaluate the value of this tool for intraoperative use. Methods: Residents were assessed with an OSATS after every procedure they performed as the primary surgeon during a 3-month clinical rotation in gynecological surgery. We mapped individual learning curves (OSATS scores plotted against experience) and established the average procedure-specific learning curve. We used linear mixed models to assess the relation between performance and experience. Results: Nine residents were recruited and 319 OSATS analyzed. Individual learning curves revealed progression beyond 24 of 30 OSATS points for 7 residents. Performance on the average procedure improved with experience, and the OSATS score increased by an average of 1.10 points per assessed procedure (p = 0.008, 95% confidence interval 0.44-1.77). Median OSATS scores ranged from 18 to 30 among the 21 assessors. Conclusion: Intraoperative implementation of OSATS seems to offer important advantages: structured feedback is facilitated, and learning curves enable insight into individual progression. However, doubts have been raised about the objectivity of the tool. Therefore, caution is warranted in using it for graduation and certification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. A case series is presented to illustrate the dilemma in management of women with Chronic Pelvic Pain (CPP) additional to a tubal sterilization. Methods. Between January 1999 and June 2007, five women consulted the Department of Gynecology for CPP additional to tubal sterilization with Filshie Clips (FCs). A biopsychosocial approach of the complaint was offered and laparoscopic removal of the clips was performed in all cases. The effectiveness of this management was assessed by a personal interview and a retrospective chart review. Results. Two of the five patients refused an exploration of psychosocial factors possibly contributing to or maintaining the pain. During laparoscopic removal of the Filshie Clips no additional pathology was noted. At follow-up four women declared to have benefited from the removal procedure. Conclusion. If women present with CPP additional to sterilization with FCs in the absence of obvious pathology, gynecologists have to pay attention to the possibility of underlying psychosocial factors to this complaint. However, this attention can be in conflict with the woman's conviction that only removal of the clips will alleviate her pain. In that case, laparoscopic removal might be a component of the management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Various steerable instruments with flexible distal tip have been developed for laparoscopic surgery. The problem of steering such instruments, however, remains a challenge, because no study investigated which control method is the most suitable. This study was designed to examine whether thumb (joystick) or wrist control method is designated for prototypes of steerable instruments by means of motion analysis. Methods: Five experts and 12 novices participated. Each participant performed a needle-driving task in three directions (right → left, up → down, and down → up) with two prototypes (wrist and thumb) and a conventional instrument. Novices performed the tasks in three sessions, whereas experts performed one session only. The order of performing the tasks was determined by Latin squares design. Assessment of performance was done by means of five motion analysis parameters, a newly developed matrix for assigning penalty points, and a questionnaire. Results: The thumb-controlled prototype outperformed the wrist-controlled prototype. Comparison of the results obtained in each task showed that regarding penalty points, the up → down task was the most difficult to perform. Conclusions: The thumb control is more suitable for steerable instruments than the wrist control. To avoid uncontrolled movements and difficulties with applying forces to the tissue while keeping the tip of the instrument at the constant angle, adding a 'locking' feature is necessary. It is advisable not to perform the needle driving task in the up → down direction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Various steerable instruments with flexible distal tip have been developed for laparoscopic surgery. The problem of steering such instruments, however, remains a challenge, because no study investigated which control method is the most suitable. This study was designed to examine whether thumb (joystick) or wrist control method is designated for prototypes of steerable instruments by means of motion analysis.Methods: Five experts and 12 novices participated. Each participant performed a needle-driving task in three directions (right → left, up → down, and down → up) with two prototypes (wrist and thumb) and a conventional instrument. Novices performed the tasks in three sessions, whereas experts performed one session only. The order of performing the tasks was determined by Latin squares design. Assessment of performance was done by means of five motion analysis parameters, a newly developed matrix for assigning penalty points, and a questionnaire.Results: The thumb-controlled prototype outperformed the wrist-controlled prototype. Comparison of the results obtained in each task showed that regarding penalty points, the up → down task was the most difficult to perform.Conclusions: The thumb control is more suitable for steerable instruments than the wrist control. To avoid uncontrolled movements and difficulties with applying forces to the tissue while keeping the tip of the instrument at the constant angle, adding a "locking" feature is necessary. It is advisable not to perform the needle driving task in the up → down direction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]