Search

OBJECTIVE: Anti-RNA polymerase I/III (anti-RNAP I/III) antibodies are clinically useful markers of scleroderma, and their presence is associated with diffuse skin disease and an increased risk of cardiac and kidney involvement. Although RNAP I antibodies localize to the nucleolus, nucleolar staining by many anti-RNAP antibody-positive sera is not always observed. Nucleolar staining by anti-RNAP antibody-positive sera was examined by double staining with antifibrillarin antibodies to evaluate whether nucleolar staining can be used as a screening test for anti-RNAP I/III antibodies. In addition, the relationships between nucleolar staining and levels of anti-RNAP III antibodies were examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunoprecipitation (IP) assay. METHODS: Sera were tested using immunofluorescent antinuclear antibodies on HEp-2 cell slides, by anti-RNAP III ELISA, and by IP assay using (35)S-labeled K562 cell extract. Nucleolar staining by anti-RNAP antibody IP-positive sera was confirmed by double staining using antifibrillarin monoclonal antibodies. The levels of anti-RNAP III antibodies were quantitated by ELISA and by IP assay using a serially diluted reference serum as a standard, and their relationship was analyzed. RESULTS: All 18 anti-RNAP I/III antibody-positive sera showed nuclear speckled patterns, but nucleolar staining was readily noticeable in only 44% of the sera. A positive correlation was found between ELISA and IP units for anti-RNAP III antibodies. The levels of anti-RNAP III antibodies and anti-RNAP I antibodies correlated well, with the exception of a few sera. Levels of anti-RNAP III antibodies were low in sera with nucleolar staining, whereas several sera with high levels of anti-RNAP I antibodies clearly showed nucleolar staining. CONCLUSION: Although some sera positive for anti-RNAP I/III antibodies clearly stain nucleoli, nucleolar staining is inconsistent and cannot be used to screen for anti-RNAP I/III antibodies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Role of OX40 blockade was investigated in islet xenograft model in chemically diabetic C57B1/6 and spontaneously diabetic NOD mice. The effect of OX40/OX40L blockade on effector function of diabetogenic T cells was studied in an adoptive transfer model. 2000 IEQ of porcine islets were transplanted under the kidney capsule of diabetic C57B1/6 or NOD mice and were treated i.p. with control Ig, anti-OX40L, or CTLA4Ig. Graft survival was assessed using blood glucose (BG) measurement. Cells from diabetic NOD spleens and pancreatic lymphnodes were injected i.v. into NOD.scid mice. Recipients were treated i.p. with anti-OX40L, CTLA4Ig alone, or in combination; control mice received Ig. Diabetes incidence was assessed using BG measurement. Anti-OX40L treatment delayed xenoislet rejection significantly in chemically diabetic animals, although CTLA4Ig delayed rejection even further. Neither treatment completely prevented rejection. In spontaneously diabetic NOD mice, rejection of xenoislet graft was delayed by anti-OX40L treatment but not by CTLA4Ig. Anti-OX40L alone and in combination with CTLA4Ig significantly delayed diabetes transfer by activated diabetogenic T cells, compared with control and CTLA4Ig treatment. Preliminary mechanistic studies suggest that anti-OX40L treatment preserves Treg numbers, unlike CTLA4Ig that diminishes Tregs. Our studies show that OX40 blockade offers better xenoislet graft survival than CTLA4Ig in spontaneous autoimmune NOD model, suggesting that preactivated T cells use alternate costimulatory pathways, independent of CD28. Results from adoptive transfer studies further support the role of OX40 signaling in effector function of diabetogenic T cells. These data suggest that OX40/OX40L may offer novel therapeutic target for xenoislet graft protection in type 1 diabetic patients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]