Search

Background: Alcohol‐associated liver disease (ALD) is a leading indication for liver transplant (LT) in the United States. Rates of early liver transplant (ELT) with less than 6 months of sobriety have increased substantially. Patients who receive ELT commonly have alcohol‐associated hepatitis (AH) and are often too ill to complete an intensive outpatient program (IOP) for alcohol use disorder (AUD) prior to LT. ELT recipients feel alienated from traditional IOPs. Methods: We implemented Total Recovery‐LT, a tailored virtual outpatient IOP specific for patients under evaluation or waitlisted for LT who were too ill to attend community‐based alcohol treatment programs. The 12‐week program consisted of weekly group and individual counseling delivered by a master's level Certified Addiction Counselor trained in the basics of LT. Treatment consisted of 12‐Step Facilitation, Motivational Interviewing, and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. We report on program design, implementation, feasibility and early outcomes. Results: From March 2021 to September 2022, 42 patients (36% female, 23 in LT evaluation, 19 post‐transplant) enrolled across five cohorts with 76% (32/42) completing the program. Alcohol relapse was more common among noncompleters versus those who completed the program (8/10, 80% vs. 7/32, 22%, p = 0.002). History of trauma or post‐traumatic stress symptoms were associated with lower likelihood of completion. Patients' desire for continued engagement after completion led to the creation of a monthly alumni group. Conclusions: Our integrated IOP model for patients with high‐risk AUD in LT evaluation or post‐transplant is well‐received by patients and could be considered a model for LT programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intensive outpatient (IOP) psychiatric treatment is increasingly deployed to meet the needs of psychiatrically high-risk youth; however, documentation of treatment disposition for in-person and/or telehealth modalities following treatment referral is largely unknown. The current study examined psychiatrically high-risk youth baseline treatment disposition patterns and explored variations according to treatment modality (telehealth vs. in-person). Using archival records of 744 adolescents (M age = 14.91, SD = 1.60) admitted to a psychiatric IOP, multinomial logistic regressions revealed that commercially insured youth fared better than non-commercially insured youth with respect to treatment completion. When treatment modality was accounted for, youth treated on telehealth were no more likely to be psychiatrically hospitalized compared to youth treated with in-person services. However, youth treated on telehealth dropped out due to excessive absences or withdrawal/refusal to a greater extent than those treated in person. Future studies should examine clinical outcomes in addition to treatment disposition patterns to further understand youth's course of treatment at intermediate level of care settings (e.g., IOP). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The COVID‐19 pandemic resulted in a shift from traditional, in‐person treatment to virtual treatment for eating disorders (EDs), with little knowledge about the relative efficacy of virtual formats. Method: In the current study, we examined baseline symptomatology and treatment outcomes of young adults in our virtual partial hospitalization and intensive outpatient program (PHP/IOP) for EDs, implemented shortly after the onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic. We investigated outcomes on body mass index, ED symptoms, anxiety, ED‐related clinical impairment, and emotion regulation. Results: We found significant differences in ED symptomatology, ED‐related clinical impairment, and difficulties with emotion regulation at admission between participants in the virtual and in‐person versions of our PHP/IOP. Despite these differences, the results demonstrated that the degree of change from admission to discharge on these measures was comparable for both conditions. Discussion: These findings suggest that PHPs and IOPs are relatively effective in a virtual format. Providing effective virtual options across various levels of care will improve access to specialized treatment for EDs. Public Significance: (i) Participants in the virtual program reported less severe symptomatology at baseline, (ii) Participants in the virtual and in‐person programs experienced similar improvements, (iii) Virtual programs may be an effective option for young adults with eating disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The effectiveness of remotely delivered group interventions and treatments for individuals with more complex psychiatric presentations is understudied. Nevertheless, the emergence of the COVID‐19 pandemic shifted such treatments from in‐person to remote service delivery without the establishment of comparable effectiveness between in‐person and remote delivery. The current study presents the results of a private practice's transition from in‐person treatment delivery to a videoconference‐delivered Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT)‐based intensive outpatient program (IOP) for individuals with comorbid mental health and substance use disorder diagnoses in response to the pandemic. Methods: Change in symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress following completion of the IOP was compared between the in‐person and videoconference groups. Results: Large reductions in symptoms were found following completion of the IOP for both the in‐person and videoconference groups. Furthermore, no significant differences in symptom reduction were found between the groups. Conclusion: Although large‐scale replication is needed, these results suggest that IOPs and other intensive group therapies delivered via videoconference may be as effective as in‐person therapies, even among individuals with more complex psychiatric presentations. Providers who have transitioned group therapies to videoconference formats or are considering creating remote groups can be more confident that they are not sacrificing treatment efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The goal of this study was to evaluate changes in knowledge, attitudes, and other key suicide prevention issues for substance use disorder (SUD) counselors trained to administer the Preventing Addiction Related Suicide (PARS) module as part of a large-scale clinical trial. PARS is a 3-hour, PowerPoint based intervention designed with and for community SUD agencies for their Intensive Outpatient (IOP) group therapy programs. A previous randomized study of 906 patients from 15 community SUD sites showed positive changes in patients' suicide prevention knowledge, attitudes, and help seeking. Counselor participants completed measures of knowledge and attitudes about suicide and their confidence treating suicidal patients at each step of a large, stepped wedge cluster randomized trial of PARS, including after the final step. Data analysis compared scores in steps prior to counselors' training in PARS with scores in the steps following counselors' PARS training. A total of 126 counselors participated in the study (89 % of those approached; 89–92 % retention across follow-up). Evaluation of both PARS efficacy and the PARS training by SUD counselors was highly rated. Counselor scores after receiving PARS training (vs. scores prior to PARS training) showed greater suicide knowledge, less maladaptive attitudes about suicide, and greater confidence in working with suicidal patients. Based on this rigorous test of PARS training for SUD counselors working in community SUD intensive outpatient programs, PARS training, as well as doing the PARS intervention, was rated as highly effective and acceptable. PARS offers an integrated, brief, engaging, and effective training method to improve suicide care for both SUD counselors and SUD clients. • Counselors are not confident in their ability to help clients experiencing suicide. • Preventing Addiction Related Suicide (PARS) training is experiential. • Training increased counselor's suicide knowledge, attitudes, and confidence. • Counselors found the PARS training effective and fit well into their workload. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Perinatal Intensive Outpatient Programs (IOPs) address severe perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs) and mother-infant relationship concerns. Given the impact of PMADs on mothers and infants, rapid transitions to virtual services (telehealth) amid COVID-19, and service expansions to populations in need, it is critical to evaluate how effectively virtual and in-person perinatal IOP services treat PMADs and mother-infant bonding.This quality-improvement record review examined patient records (n = 361) for a perinatal IOP from May 2016 to July 2023, amid multiple transitions between in-person and virtual services related to COVID-19, influenza, and respiratory syncytial virus. Patients in the completed measures sample (n = 115) completed depression (EPDS), anxiety (GAD-7, PASS), and mother-infant bonding (PBQ) measures over the first 3 weeks of treatment. Patients also anonymously provided program satisfaction ratings and qualitative feedback.While anxiety and depression symptoms improved similarly across service settings, mother-baby bonding only significantly improved with in-person treatment. Patient symptom outcomes also differed by public/private insurance, race, and number of children. Patients reported high service ratings and overall satisfaction, and available feedback indicates some preference for in-person services.As perinatal mental health services and IOPs continue to expand, virtual services can similarly address anxiety and depression symptoms and help to reach in-need populations. However, for perinatal IOPs, the core treatment target of mother-infant bonding may be uniquely addressed via in-person services.Methods: Perinatal Intensive Outpatient Programs (IOPs) address severe perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs) and mother-infant relationship concerns. Given the impact of PMADs on mothers and infants, rapid transitions to virtual services (telehealth) amid COVID-19, and service expansions to populations in need, it is critical to evaluate how effectively virtual and in-person perinatal IOP services treat PMADs and mother-infant bonding.This quality-improvement record review examined patient records (n = 361) for a perinatal IOP from May 2016 to July 2023, amid multiple transitions between in-person and virtual services related to COVID-19, influenza, and respiratory syncytial virus. Patients in the completed measures sample (n = 115) completed depression (EPDS), anxiety (GAD-7, PASS), and mother-infant bonding (PBQ) measures over the first 3 weeks of treatment. Patients also anonymously provided program satisfaction ratings and qualitative feedback.While anxiety and depression symptoms improved similarly across service settings, mother-baby bonding only significantly improved with in-person treatment. Patient symptom outcomes also differed by public/private insurance, race, and number of children. Patients reported high service ratings and overall satisfaction, and available feedback indicates some preference for in-person services.As perinatal mental health services and IOPs continue to expand, virtual services can similarly address anxiety and depression symptoms and help to reach in-need populations. However, for perinatal IOPs, the core treatment target of mother-infant bonding may be uniquely addressed via in-person services.Results: Perinatal Intensive Outpatient Programs (IOPs) address severe perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs) and mother-infant relationship concerns. Given the impact of PMADs on mothers and infants, rapid transitions to virtual services (telehealth) amid COVID-19, and service expansions to populations in need, it is critical to evaluate how effectively virtual and in-person perinatal IOP services treat PMADs and mother-infant bonding.This quality-improvement record review examined patient records (n = 361) for a perinatal IOP from May 2016 to July 2023, amid multiple transitions between in-person and virtual services related to COVID-19, influenza, and respiratory syncytial virus. Patients in the completed measures sample (n = 115) completed depression (EPDS), anxiety (GAD-7, PASS), and mother-infant bonding (PBQ) measures over the first 3 weeks of treatment. Patients also anonymously provided program satisfaction ratings and qualitative feedback.While anxiety and depression symptoms improved similarly across service settings, mother-baby bonding only significantly improved with in-person treatment. Patient symptom outcomes also differed by public/private insurance, race, and number of children. Patients reported high service ratings and overall satisfaction, and available feedback indicates some preference for in-person services.As perinatal mental health services and IOPs continue to expand, virtual services can similarly address anxiety and depression symptoms and help to reach in-need populations. However, for perinatal IOPs, the core treatment target of mother-infant bonding may be uniquely addressed via in-person services.Conclusion: Perinatal Intensive Outpatient Programs (IOPs) address severe perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs) and mother-infant relationship concerns. Given the impact of PMADs on mothers and infants, rapid transitions to virtual services (telehealth) amid COVID-19, and service expansions to populations in need, it is critical to evaluate how effectively virtual and in-person perinatal IOP services treat PMADs and mother-infant bonding.This quality-improvement record review examined patient records (n = 361) for a perinatal IOP from May 2016 to July 2023, amid multiple transitions between in-person and virtual services related to COVID-19, influenza, and respiratory syncytial virus. Patients in the completed measures sample (n = 115) completed depression (EPDS), anxiety (GAD-7, PASS), and mother-infant bonding (PBQ) measures over the first 3 weeks of treatment. Patients also anonymously provided program satisfaction ratings and qualitative feedback.While anxiety and depression symptoms improved similarly across service settings, mother-baby bonding only significantly improved with in-person treatment. Patient symptom outcomes also differed by public/private insurance, race, and number of children. Patients reported high service ratings and overall satisfaction, and available feedback indicates some preference for in-person services.As perinatal mental health services and IOPs continue to expand, virtual services can similarly address anxiety and depression symptoms and help to reach in-need populations. However, for perinatal IOPs, the core treatment target of mother-infant bonding may be uniquely addressed via in-person services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pica, the developmentally and culturally-inappropriate eating of non-nutritive and non-food substances, is most often documented in people with developmental disabilities and children, frequently in institutional and residential settings. To date, there are no randomized clinical trials on pica-specific treatments, and very little literature is available regarding the characteristics or treatment of pica in adults with no intellectual or social deficits, and co-morbid disorders. This case study addresses this gap, and involves a highly educated 30 year-old American woman with foam rubber pica and burned match consumption (cautopyreiophagia) behaviors, along with co-morbid depressive, anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms, who received treatment in a general intensive outpatient program for adults in a large urban community psychiatry setting. The case study describes how the Biosocial Theory and Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior Change were used to conceptualize this woman's symptoms and guide a treatment team of clinicians who did not specialize in pica. Providers in non-specialty clinic settings would benefit from reflecting on ways to adapt evidence-based techniques to the treatment of uncommon symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Americans experiencing substance use disorder (SUD) carry a significant chronic disease burden, yet only half use primary care. Patients in treatment for SUD who are connected with primary care typically have better overall health outcomes. Local problem: The identified intensive outpatient program (IOP) had no protocol in place to engage patients with primary care. Methods: This project piloted the development and implementation of an original, evidence-based primary care integration program. It consisted of a psychoeducation group, a referral by case management, and establishment of an internal referral process to affiliated primary care providers (PCPs). Interventions: Following the psychoeducation group, pre and posttests of patient-reported knowledge and attitudes regarding primary care were compared. Participants were contacted to collect further data after IOP discharge. An education and feedback session was held with affiliated PCPs, and an internal referral process was devised by leadership. Results: Mean scores measuring patient knowledge and attitudes regarding primary care increased after participation in the structured psychoeducation group. By time of IOP discharge, 100% (n = 12) of participants had either a referral or scheduled appointment with a PCP in place. At time of follow-up, 90% (n = 9) reported that they had attended or planned to attend their scheduled PCP appointment. Conclusions: A comprehensive integration program in the IOP setting can improve patient engagement with primary care. Quality improvement implementation will require consideration of challenges faced during the pilot involving scheduling, staff buy-in, changes in patient acuity, the electronic medical record, and insurance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Evidence-based treatments (EBTs) have been well studied in outpatient and research settings to address a myriad of mental health concerns. Research studies have found benefits and challenges when implementing these interventions. However, less is known about the implementation of EBTs in acute and intensive treatment settings such as inpatient psychiatric hospitalization (IPH) units, partial hospitalization programs (PHPs), or intensive outpatient programs (IOPs). As a result, the specific benefits and challenges of providing EBTs in these settings are less clear. For example, challenges of implementing EBTs in IPHs, PHPs, and IOPs can include working within a multi-disciplinary team setting and sustaining trained staff. The current article provides an overview of implementing EBTs in IPHs PHPs, and IOPs. Current PHP, IOP, and IPH models of implementing evidence-based interventions along with strategies for engaging stakeholders, program development and implementation, and measurement are reviewed. Further considerations for sustainability and practice consideration are also provided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is the most common psychological health condition in military service members and veterans who have deployed to the combat theater since September 11, 2001. One of the highest research priorities for the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs is to develop and evaluate the most efficient and efficacious treatments possible for combat-related PTSD. However, the treatment of combat-related PTSD in military service members and veterans has been significantly more challenging than the treatment of PTSD in civilians. Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated large posttreatment effect sizes for PTSD in civilian populations. However, recent randomized clinical trials of service members and veterans have achieved lesser reductions in PTSD symptoms. These results suggest that combat-related PTSD is unique. Innovative approaches are needed to augment established evidence-based treatments with targeted interventions that address the distinctive elements of combat-related traumas. This paper describes the design, methodology, and protocol of a randomized clinical trial to compare two intensive prolonged exposure therapy treatments for combat-related PTSD in active duty military service members and veterans and that can be administered in an acceptable, efficient manner in this population. Both interventions include intensive daily treatment over a 3-week period and a number of treatment enhancements hypothesized to result in greater reductions in combat-related PTSD symptoms. The study is designed to advance the delivery of care for combat-related PTSD by developing and evaluating the most potent treatments possible to reduce PTSD symptomatology and improve psychological, social, and occupational functioning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Substance use disorder is often a chronic condition, and its treatment requires patient access to a continuum of care, including inpatient, residential, partial hospitalization, intensive outpatient, and outpatient programs. Ideally, patients complete treatment at the most suitable level for their immediate individual needs, then transition to the next appropriate level. In practice, however, attrition rates are high, as many patients discharge before successfully completing a treatment program or struggle to transition to follow-up care after program discharge. Previous studies analyzed up to two programs at a time in single-center datasets, meaning no studies have assessed patient attrition and follow-up behavior across all five levels of substance use treatment programs in parallel. To address this major gap, this retrospective study collected patient demographics, enrollment, discharge, and outcomes data across five substance use treatment levels at a large Midwestern psychiatric hospital from 2017 to 2019. Data analyses used descriptive statistics and regression analyses. Analyses found several differences in treatment engagement based on patient-level variables. Inpatients were more likely to identify as Black or female compared to lower-acuity programs. Patients were less likely to step down in care if they were younger, Black, had Medicare coverage were discharging from inpatient treatment, or had specific behavioral health diagnoses. Patients were more likely to relapse if they were male or did not engage in follow-up SUD treatment. Future studies should assess mechanisms by which these variables influence treatment access, develop programmatic interventions that encourage appropriate transitions between programs, and determine best practices for increasing access to treatment. • SUD treatment programs had high levels of attrition and few care step-downs. • Patients were less likely to relapse if they stepped down in care within 14 days. • Patient-level variables predicted odds of stepping down in care after discharge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Compulsive hoarding patients have been found in previous studies to have substantial disability and functional impairment. However, no prior study has examined subjective and objective quality of life (QOL) in patients with compulsive hoarding. This present study compared compulsive hoarders and non-hoarding OCD patients across a variety of QOL domains. Subjects were 171 consecutive adult patients (34 compulsive hoarders, 137 non-hoarding patients with DSM-IV OCD) treated openly between 1998 and 2004 in the UCLA OCD Partial Hospitalization Program (OCD PHP), a specialized, intensive, multi-modal treatment program for treatment-refractory patients. Scores on the Quality of Life Scale and other symptom severity measures on admission were compared between compulsive hoarders and non-hoarding OCD patients. Compulsive hoarders were older and had lower global functioning than non-hoarding OCD patients. Both groups had low overall QOL scores across multiple domains. Compulsive hoarders had significantly lower levels of satisfaction with their safety than non-hoarding OCD patients, were more often the victims of both violent and non-violent crime, felt less safe in their neighborhoods, and felt less protected against attack. Compulsive hoarders were also much less satisfied with their living arrangements than non-hoarding OCD patients. No differences were found on financial variables, but the vast majority of patients in both groups were unemployed. Compulsive hoarders have lower QOL than non-hoarding OCD patients in the domains of safety and living situation. Psychosocial rehabilitation that focuses on problems with victimization, safety, employment, and financial areas may be a beneficial augmentation to treatment for compulsive hoarding. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: There is a growing consensus that there is a need to test the real world effectiveness of eating disorder therapies that show promise in efficacy research. This article provides a narrative account of an NIMH-funded study that attempted to apply efficacy findings from CBT research to an Intensive Outpatient Program (IOP) at the largest communitybased eating disorder program in the United States. Method: We describe the study as originally envisioned as well as the various challenges that the researchers and the IOP staff encountered in implementing this study. Results: The different training, assumptions, and ‘‘ways of knowing’’ of the research team and the treatment staff in regard to the nature of eating disorders and their treatment created multiple challenges for both groups during the study period. We describe valuable lessons learned about how to-and how not to-implement effectiveness designs in clinical settings that are relatively unfamiliar with empirically-based research findings. Discussion: It is hoped that our experience in attempting to apply efficacy based research findings on eating disorders treatment in a community-based clinical setting will prove helpful to other researchers and service providers engaging in such translational research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]