Search

We use the implementation science framework RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) to describe outcomes of In Our DNA SC, a population-wide genomic screening (PWGS) program. In Our DNA SC involves participation through clinical appointments, community events, or at home collection. Participants provide a saliva sample that is sequenced by Helix, and those with a pathogenic variant or likely pathogenic variant for CDC Tier 1 conditions are offered free genetic counseling. We assessed key outcomes among the first cohort of individuals recruited. Over 14 months, 20,478 participants enrolled, and 14,053 samples were collected. The majority selected at-home sample collection followed by clinical sample collection and collection at community events. Participants were predominately female, White (self-identified), non-Hispanic, and between the ages of 40–49. Participants enrolled through community events were the most racially diverse and the youngest. Half of those enrolled completed the program. We identified 137 individuals with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants for CDC Tier 1 conditions. The majority (77.4%) agreed to genetic counseling, and of those that agreed, 80.2% completed counseling. Twelve clinics participated, and we conducted 108 collection events. Participants enrolled at home were most likely to return their sample for sequencing. Through this evaluation, we identified facilitators and barriers to implementation of our state-wide PWGS program. Standardized reporting using implementation science frameworks can help generalize strategies and improve the impact of PWGS. We evaluated In Our DNA SC, a population-wide genomic screening program, through the RE-AIM framework. In 14 months, over 20,000 individuals enrolled, providing 14,053 samples. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants for a CDC Tier 1 condition were found in 137 individuals, with the majority of individuals agreeing to genetic counseling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Disparities in pregnancy outcomes among women with SLE remain understudied, with few available racially diverse datasets. We sought to identify disparities between Black and White women in pregnancy outcomes within academic institutions in the United States. Methods Using the Common Data Model electronic medical record (EMR)-based datasets within the Carolinas Collaborative, we identified women with pregnancy delivery data (2014–2019) and ≥1 SLE International Classification of Diseases 9 or 10 code (ICD9/10) code. From this dataset, we identified four cohorts of SLE pregnancies, three based on EMR-based algorithms and one confirmed with chart review. We compared the pregnancy outcomes identified in each of these cohorts for Black and White women. Results Of 172 pregnancies in women with ≥1 SLE ICD9/10 code, 49% had confirmed SLE. Adverse pregnancy outcomes occurred in 40% of pregnancies in women with ≥1 ICD9/10 SLE code and 52% of pregnancies with confirmed SLE. SLE was frequently over-diagnosed in women who were White, resulting in 40–75% lower rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes in EMR-derived vs confirmed SLE cohorts. Over-diagnosis was less common for Black women with pregnancy outcomes 12–20% lower in EMR-derived vs confirmed SLE cohorts. Black women had higher rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White women in the EMR-derived, but not the confirmed cohorts. Conclusion EMR-derived cohorts of pregnancies in women who are Black, but not White, provided accurate estimations of pregnancy outcomes. The data from the confirmed SLE pregnancies suggest that all women with SLE, regardless of race, referred to academic centres remain at very high risk for adverse pregnancy outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]