Search

Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis is a neurological, autoimmune disorder tightly conceptualized only as recently as the mid-2000s. It presents itself in a combination of psychiatric, neurological, and autonomic features. We observe a unique case with probable earlier episode (prior to the mid-2000s conceptualization of the disease) and a later relapse, accompanying a comprehensive neuropsychological profile tracked after the relapse and subsequent improvement. Neurocognitive findings revealed residual frontal deficits with mood changes even in the state after plasmapheresis. This case is the first to describe posttreatment cognition in anti-NMDAR encephalitis after probable serial autoimmune episodes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Primary care integration of Down syndrome (DS)-specific dementia screening is strongly advised. The current study employed principal components analysis (PCA) and classification and regression tree (CART) analyses to identify an abbreviated battery for dementia classification. Scale- and subscale-level scores from 141 participants (no dementia n = 68; probable Alzheimer's disease n = 73), for the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB), Dementia Scale for People with Learning Disabilities (DLD), and Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales—Second Edition (Vineland-II) were analyzed. Two principle components (PC1, PC2) were identified with the odds of a probable dementia diagnosis increasing 2.54 times per PC1 unit increase and by 3.73 times per PC2 unit increase. CART analysis identified that the DLD sum of cognitive scores (SCS < 35 raw) and Vineland-II community subdomain (<36 raw) scores best classified dementia. No significant difference in the PCA versus CART area under the curve (AUC) was noted (D(65.196) = −0.57683; p = 0.57; PCA AUC = 0.87; CART AUC = 0.91). The PCA sensitivity was 80% and specificity was 70%; CART was 100% and specificity was 81%. These results support an abbreviated dementia screening battery to identify at-risk individuals with DS in primary care settings to guide specialized diagnostic referral. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Informant ratings of adaptive functioning are a valuable source of information that can support diagnosis and treatment planning and monitor change. The Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (ABAS-II) and Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS-II) are well-known adaptive functioning questionnaires used in clinical practice. This study assessed the correspondence between ABAS-II and VABS-II composite scales in adults with Down Syndrome (DS). Method: Participants were selected from a cohort of 110 adults with DS involved in a longitudinal study examining Alzheimer's risk. Participants were selected if they had informant ratings on both the ABAS-II and VABS-II at the same measurement wave (n = 85; M = 41.9 years-old, SD = 10.8; 55.3% female; 96.5% White). Due to non-normality, non-parametric correlations examined convergent validity of the ABAS-II and VABS-II standard scores. Results: The composite scores of similar constructs from each measure correlated significantly (ps < 0.001) with large effect sizes: ABAS-II Conceptual with VABS-II Communication (rho = 0.53), ABAS-II Social with VABS-II Socialization (rho = 0.83), ABAS-II Practical with VABS-II Daily Living Skills (rho = 0.84), and ABAS-II Global Adaptive Composite (GAC) with VABS-II Adaptive Behavior Composite (ABC) (rho = 0.88). There was 85.2% correspondence between ABAS-II and VABS-II ratings of low adaptive functioning (SS < 70 on the GAC or ABC, respectively), with just 14.8% of participants (n = 12) categorized as low on VABS-II but not ABAS-II. Conclusion(s): The ABAS-II and VABS-II composites were strongly correlated, capturing similar adaptive domains. However, there was a greater chance of being rated as low functioning on the VABS-II compared to the ABAS-II, which may have diagnostic implications for clinical and research work in DS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mild cognitive changes, including executive dysfunction, are seen in Parkinson's Disease (PD). Approximately 30% of individuals with PD develop Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD). Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) has been identified as a transitional state between normal cognition and dementia. Although PD-MCI and its cognitive correlates have been increasingly studied as a risk indicator for development of PDD, investigations into the PD-MCI construct have yielded heterogeneous findings. Thus, a typical PD-MCI cognitive profile remains undefined. The present meta-analysis examined published cross-sectional studies of PD-MCI and cognitively normal PD (PD-CN) groups to provide aggregated effect sizes of group test performance by cognitive domain. Subsequently, longitudinal studies examining PD-MCI to PDD progression were meta-analyzed. Ninety-two cross-sectional articles of PD-MCI vs. PD-CN were included; 5 longitudinal studies of PD-MCI conversion to PDD were included. Random effects meta-analytic models were constructed resulting in effect sizes (Hedges' g) for cognitive domains. Overall performance across all measures produced a large effect size (g = 0.83, 95% CI [0.79, 0.86], t2 = 0.18) in cross-sectional analyses, with cognitive screeners producing the largest effect (g = 1.09, 95% CI [1.00, 1.17], t2 = 0.19). Longitudinally, overall measures produced a moderate effect (g = 0.47, 95% CI [0.40, 0.53], t2 = 0.01), with measures of executive functioning exhibiting the largest effect (g = 0.70, 95% CI [0.51, 0.89], t2 = 0.01). Longitudinal effects were made more robust by low heterogeneity. This report provides the first comprehensive meta-analysis of PD-MCI cognitive outcomes and predictors in PD-MCI conversion to PDD. Limitations include heterogeneity of cross-sectional effect sizes and the potential impact of small-study effects. Areas for continued research include visuospatial skills and visual memory in PD-MCI and longitudinal examination of executive dysfunction in PD-MCI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Adults with Down syndrome are at an ultra-high risk of Alzheimer's disease, but diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in this population is challenging. We aimed to validate the clinical utility of plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) for the diagnosis of symptomatic Alzheimer's disease in Down syndrome, assess its prognostic value, and establish longitudinal changes in adults with Down syndrome.Methods: We did a multicentre cohort study, including adults with Down syndrome (≥18 years), recruited from six hospitals and university medical centres in France, Germany, Spain, the UK, and the USA, who had been assessed, followed up, and provided at least two plasma samples. Participants were classified by local clinicians, who were masked to biomarker data, as asymptomatic (ie, no clinical suspicion of Alzheimer's disease), prodromal Alzheimer's disease, or Alzheimer's disease dementia. We classified individuals who progressed along the Alzheimer's disease continuum during follow-up as progressors. Plasma samples were analysed retrospectively; NfL concentrations were measured centrally using commercial kits for biomarker detection. We used ANOVA to evaluate differences in baseline NfL concentrations, Cox regression to study their prognostic value, and linear mixed models to estimate longitudinal changes. To account for potential confounders, we included age, sex, and intellectual disability as covariates in the analyses.Findings: Between Aug 2, 2010, and July 16, 2019, we analysed 608 samples from 236 people with Down syndrome: 165 (70%) were asymptomatic, 32 (14%) had prodromal Alzheimer's disease, and 29 (12%) had Alzheimer's disease dementia; ten [4%] participants were excluded because their classification was uncertain. Mean follow-up was 3·6 years (SD 1·6, range 0·6-9·2). Baseline plasma NfL concentrations showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0·83 (95% CI 0·76-0·91) in the prodromal group and 0·94 (0·90-0·97) in the dementia group for differentiating from participants who were asymptomatic. An increase of 1 pg/mL in baseline NfL concentrations was associated with a 1·04-fold risk of clinical progression (95% CI 1·01-1·07; p=0·0034). Plasma NfL concentrations showed an annual increase of 3·0% (95% CI 0·4-5·8) per year in the asymptomatic non-progressors group, 11·5% (4·9-18·5) per year in the asymptomatic progressors group, and 16·0% (8·4-24·0) per year in the prodromal Alzheimer's disease progressors group. In participants with Alzheimer's disease dementia, NfL concentrations increased by a mean of 24·3% (15·3-34·1).Interpretation: Plasma NfL concentrations have excellent diagnostic and prognostic performance for symptomatic Alzheimer's disease in Down syndrome. The longitudinal trajectory of plasma NfL supports its use as a theragnostic marker in clinical trials.Funding: AC Immune, La Caixa Foundation, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, National Institute on Aging, Wellcome Trust, Jérôme Lejeune Foundation, Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research, EU Joint Programme-Neurodegenerative Disease Research, Alzheimer's society, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Stiftung für die Erforschung von Verhaltens und Umwelteinflüssen auf die menschliche Gesundheit, and NHS National Institute of Health Research Applied Research Collaborations East of England, UK. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment (CICI), 'chemo-brain,' involves concentration and executive functioning difficulty and slowed processing speed and memory. Although cognitive changes in CICI can be subtle and difficult to quantify, CICI affects up to 75% of cancer survivors and impacts quality of life. The objective of our study was to add to the definition of CICI by quantifying changes in specific cognitive domains before and after administration of platinum/taxane-based chemotherapy in gynecologic cancer patients using a tailored battery of neurocognitive tests. Following institutional review board approval, chemotherapy-naïve gynecologic cancer patients scheduled to receive six cycles of intravenous platinum/taxane-based chemotherapy were identified. Baseline demographic, social, and clinical characteristics were obtained. Eleven neurocognitive assessments measured cognitive domains of interest (Table 1), including a brief cognitive screen, evaluation of fine motor skills, verbal fluency, working memory, information processing speed, visuospatial learning and memory, attention, mental flexibility, and abstract problem-solving skills. The European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 and Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire assessed emotional functioning. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Cognitive Function assessed self-perceived cognitive functioning. Testing was performed prior to the first and three to four weeks after the last cycle of chemotherapy. Descriptive statistics identified trends in individual indices of cognitive dysfunction and quality of life. Fourteen patients enrolled and nine were eligible for complete analyses. The mean age was 60.6 years. The mean full scale intelligence quotient prior to therapy was 103.5. Most patients were White (8/9, 89%), had obtained at least a Bachelor's degree (5/9, 55.6%), and were diagnosed with high grade (6/9, 66.7%) stage III or IV disease (5/9, 55.6%). The majority of patients declined on cognitive screening performance (5/9, 55.6%) as well as worse scores on indices of attention (7/9, 77.8%), mental flexibility (5/8, 62.5%) verbal learning (5/9, 55.6%), and fine motor skills (5/9, 55.6%) after completion of chemotherapy. Most patients improved on indices of verbal memory (7/9, 77.8%), visuospatial learning (6/8, 75%), and verbal fluency (5/9, 55.6%). Despite changes in indices of cognitive function, most patients' perceived quality of life improved (5/9, 55.6%) after chemotherapy. [Display omitted] Although gynecologic cancer patients complain of CICI, there is discrepancy regarding its incidence and affected cognitive domains. This pilot study highlights attention and mental flexibility as indices of cognitive dysfunction that may be at risk following receipt of chemotherapy in gynecologic cancer patients. Future research may focus on targeted assessment strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]